Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Stoke-on-Trent City Council in Stoke-on-Trent

Inspected 10 Jan 2013 · published 22 Feb 2013 · URN SC408369

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Michelle Spruce

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    10 Jan 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Michelle Spruce

  • URN verified

    SC408369

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−1Mixedmore positive than 32% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandinggood progresspositiveeffectivelyhappylovesettled
Criticisminadequatefailednot metdeclined

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings575w−1
  • What needs to improve47w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
619
shorter than usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 50
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
1
typical 4
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 80%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 14%

Full report text

Unique reference number SC408369 Inspection date 10/01/2013 Inspector Michelle Spruce Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home

p.1

Date of last inspection 17/07/2012 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Brief description of the service

This is a children's home run by a local authority. It provides care and accommodation for two young people between 10 and 18 who may have emotional and/or behavioural difficulties.

p.3

The inspection judgements and what they mean

Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.

p.3

Progress

Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making satisfactory progress .

p.3

Progress

At the previous full inspection in July 2012, the overall effectiveness of the service was outstanding. No requirements or recommendations were made.

p.3

Progress

There have been some significant changes within the home since the last inspection. A new manager was recruited in September 2012 and is currently in the process of applying to become the Registered Manager. Although this is taking a significant amount of time, there has been no impact to the quality of care or outcomes for young people. The management structure has strengthened because there is now an assistant manager who provides support to the leadership and management of the home, which maintains positive outcomes. The home continues to be managed effectively and efficiently.

p.3

Progress

The manager confirms there has been a focus on helping young people gain qualifications by other means where they have struggled. This is outlined in the home development plan and staff support and assist to maximise learning potential. This helps young people to continue to achieve recognition for their learning. Young people new to the home have settled well and say they are happy and love it. However, young people have not been given the young people’s guide or had this explained to them. This means young people may not understand the expectations or rules of the home.

p.3

Progress

Young people that have been resident at the home for some time show improvement in accessing education and now benefit from an extended timetable. Other young people that expressed a wish to return home have left as result of consultation and advocating.

p.4

Progress

Young people are encouraged to give their view and opinions through attendance and participation in residents meetings, 1:1 discussions and attendance of the Children in Care Council. Staff find that young people have made visible progression in confidence and self-esteem as a direct result of their involvement in consultation. Young people say, ‘I now attend my appointments on my own.’

p.4

Progress

Staff improve practice by gaining advice from external professionals that they invite to attend team meetings. This provides a forum to share good practice on a ‘need to know’ basis that helps to improve outcomes for young people’s emotional and physical health.

p.4

Recommendations

To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):

p.4

Recommendations

 ensure children receive the children's guide at the point of placement and that the contents are explained to the child in a way that is accessible. (NMS 13.4)

p.4

About this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.

p.5

About this inspection

The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion