Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by My Choice Children’s Homes Limited in West Sussex
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
10 Jan 2013
- Inspectors verified
Kevin Whatley
- URN verified
SC029865
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 870
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 39, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC029865 Inspection date 10/01/2013 Inspector Kevin Whatley Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 02/08/2012 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Brief description of the service
The home caters for up to three young people who have emotional and behavioural difficulties. The home is privately owned.
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress .
p.3
Progress
At the last inspection, carried out in August 2012, the home was judged as adequate. Three recommendations were made on that occasion, these related to the management of bullying, supervision of staff and the availability of drivers. Subsequent to the full inspection an investigation visit took place in October 2012 following a number of concerning notifications received from the home. This visit resulted in two requirements being made regarding care planning and the management of bullying type behaviours. All of the requirements have now been met while the recommendations have been addressed.
p.3
Progress
The organisation has taken a rigorous approach in addressing the shortfalls identified at the last inspection and investigation visit. This has included the appointment of a new manager and a thorough review of care practices, care planning procedures and risk management processes.
p.3
Progress
Young people have their challenging and risk-taking behaviours comprehensively addressed leading to vastly improved outcomes. Detailed care planning is in place with agreed strategies in place to manage and reduce the vulnerabilities of young people and the risks they pose to themselves or others. Staff are consistent in implementing intervention programmes. High levels of staff supervision greatly reduces the opportunities for incidents, such as bullying, to take place. Young people have been assisted to talk together to resolve their differences with staff facilitating reparation meetings leading to a much calmer environment.
p.3
Progress
Staff are trained in dealing with situations that include violence and aggression and only use restraint as a last resort. Levels of restraint have reduced considerably with de-escalation techniques a guiding principle of practice. The approach towards behaviour management in general is much improved and is assisting young people to keep themselves safer.
p.4
Progress
Young people say they have made, 'massive improvements' in their behaviour since the last inspection and state that bullying does not occur. Young people who had been exhibiting aggressive behaviours towards each other, including actions that were deemed bullying, have significantly reduced the occasions these occur. Young people say staff have helped them to learn about their anger management and how they deal with the tensions of living together. Young people noted that, 'staff are great' and, 'really understand them.'
p.4
Progress
The atmosphere of the home was vibrant and despite some challenging and vociferous behaviour, staff provided firm, consistent and appropriate boundaries. It was clear that open and honest communication between young people and staff is a cornerstone of practice with meaningful relationships having developed as a result. Staff have a very good understanding of the specific needs of the young people in their care and are mindful of the group living dynamics. This ensures young people are enabled to learn about themselves and each other and to consider notions of mutual respect and understanding.
p.4
Progress
Young people have easy access to education with plans put in place to meet their learning needs. The organisation employ peripatetic teaching staff who can provide on-site education to those young people not in mainstream schooling. Despite a programme being in place some young people were reluctant to engage with the teacher during the inspection. Young people acknowledged that they should be attending education but that they were choosing not to on this occasion.
p.4
Progress
Staff receive a good level of training which they say matches the needs of young people being looked after. Records confirmed that formal supervision takes place regularly with staff noting they receive 'excellent' guidance and support. Records confirmed that at least one member of staff, who can drive the homes vehicle, is working every day; no young person raised this as a concern.
p.4
Progress
Since the last inspection a new acting manager has been appointed. The acting manager has worked in a senior role in the organisation for many years and was previously registered as manager for the home. She has a wealth of experience and displays a drive and commitment to achieving the best possible outcomes for young people. Her application to be registered as manager for the home has been submitted and is currently being processed.
p.4
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.5
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion