Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Bristol City Council in Bristol

Inspected 18 Dec 2012 · published 29 Jan 2013 · URN SC034211

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Peter Harrell

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    18 Dec 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Peter Harrell

  • URN verified

    SC034211

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−17Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisegood progresspositivelyenthusiasticpositivenurturingindependentclearlyimproving
Criticisminadequatefailednot metdeclinedconcern

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings640w−13
  • What needs to improve102w−33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
739
shorter than usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 50
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
1
typical 4
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 76%What needs to improve 12%About the inspection 12%

Full report text

Unique reference number SC034211 Inspection date 18/12/2012 Inspector Peter Harrell Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home

p.1

Date of last inspection 23/07/2012 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Brief description of the service

This home is one of a number of children's homes operated by a city council. It provides care and accommodation for up to five young people who have emotional and/or behaviour difficulties. The home is an admissions unit where the intention is to move young people on to more suitable care and accommodation, such as a return to their parental home, identified foster placement, preparation for independent living, or a long-term children's home.

p.3

The inspection judgements and what they mean

Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.

p.3

Progress

Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making satisfactory progress .

p.3

Progress

The overall effectiveness of the service was judged as providing an adequate level of care for young people, at the last inspection on 23rd July 2012. The service has addressed all the requirements, and five out of the six recommendations that were raised at this inspection.

p.3

Progress

As a consequence of this interim inspection, there is one requirement raised which is related to a previous recommendation and one new, good practice recommendation.

p.3

Progress

Since the last inspection, there are improvements in the physical conditions of the home. All fire escapes are now clearly labelled and accessible; regular fire drills take place in the daytime and at night. In addition, the fire risk assessment has been updated and young people have also been instructed on what to do in case of fire. The home has re-introduced a visitors book which is used regularly; staff receive appropriate support and supervision to helps them to meet the needs of young people; Information regarding smoking cessation is on display at the home and 'quit packs' are available to young people. The practice where medicines intended for staff, were kept in the same cabinet with young people’s medication, has ceased.

p.3

Progress

Five months since the last inspection, systems are now in place to monitor the performance of the home at regular intervals. The regulation 33 visits take place and reports for these visits were available in the home. However, they have not all been submitted to the HMCI at Ofsted.

p.4

Progress

Young people speak positively about the care they receive. Consultation is sought with young people through the recent use of questionnaires and key worker sessions. Young people confirmed that they are helped to raise any matters which concern them. Although policies and procedures are in place to deal with any complaints, which are accessible and contained in the young person's guide, English is not the first language for several of the young people currently living the home; they would be better equipped upon arrival, if the children's guide was translated into their home language.

p.4

Progress

The Registered Manager is enthusiastic about improving young people's outcomes and the quality of care of the service, together with keeping young people safe. There remains a stable staff team at the home who provide positive role models and nurturing relationships with young people.

p.4

Statutory Requirements

This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children's Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The registered person(s) must comply with the given timescales.

p.4

Reg. Requirement Due date

(2001) ensure copies of records of visits which are undertaken by the registered provider are supplied to HMCI. (Regulation 33(5a)) 31/01/2013

p.4

Recommendations

To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):

p.4

Recommendations

 ensure where the child requires it, the children's guide is available through suitable methods of communication, specifically translation into another language. (NMS 13.6)

p.4

About this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.

p.5

About this inspection

The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion