Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Mid Somerset Consortium

Inspected 17 Jan 2013 · published 19 Feb 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Joanna Beckford-Hall

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    17 Jan 2013

  • Inspectors AI-checked

    Joanna Beckford-Hall

  • Name on report verified

    Mid Somerset Consortium

Page 1 of 13
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+87Very positivemore positive than 90% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingexcellenthigh qualityhigh expectationsvery wellextremelysuccessfullyrapid progress
Criticisminadequaterequires improvementweakernot yetnot successfulnot confidentvariation

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings2173w+84
  • Leadership774w+89
  • What needs to improve37w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
13
Words of findings
2,946
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 35, typical 45
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 62%Leadership 22%What needs to improve 1%About the inspection 15%

Full report text

January 2013 This inspection was carried out by two of Her Majesty’s Inspectors in accordance with the Handbook for inspecting initial teacher education from September 2012 .

p.1

The inspection draws upon evidence from within the ITE partnership to make judgements against all parts of the evaluation schedule. Inspectors focused on the overall effectiveness of the ITE partnership in securing high-quality outcomes for trainees.

p.1

Inspection judgements

Key to judgements: Grade 1 is outstanding; grade 2 is good; grade 3 is requires improvement; grade 4 is inadequate

p.1

based routes

Overall effectiveness How well does the partnership secure consistently high quality outcomes for trainees? The outcomes for trainees 1

p.1

based routes

The quality of training across the partnership 1

p.1

based routes

The quality of leadership and management across the partnership Mid Somerset Consortium

p.1

based routes

Initial Teacher Education inspection report Inspection Dates: 14–17 January 2013 January 2013 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It rates council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.1

based routes

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. www.ofsted.gov.uk Reference no. 080190 January 2013

p.2

Information about the employment-based partnership

1. Mid Somerset Consortium provides employment-based initial teacher training for graduate trainees. The consortium is located at the lead school, Crispin School, and works as a partnership of six key partner schools and over 30 associate maintained and independent schools. Mid Somerset Consortium has applied to the Teaching Agency to change its status to become an accredited provider of school-centred initial teacher training (SCITT) from September 2013.

p.3

Information about the employment-based partnership

2. At the time of the inspection, there were 40 trainees studying the full- time graduate teacher course. The training covers the 11 to 16 age range across a range of secondary subjects. Subjects offered this year are English, mathematics, science including chemistry, physics and biology, music, physical education, dance, drama, modern languages, history and religious education.

p.3

Information about the employment-based ITE inspection

3. Inspectors watched six lessons taught by trainees, two by recently qualified teachers (RQTs within their first and second year of teaching once qualified) and six by newly qualified teachers (NQTs, who are in their first year of teaching), across six partnership schools. In addition, inspectors observed trainers giving feedback to trainees and scrutinised trainers’ lesson observations records and reports, trainees’ teaching files and evidence for the Teachers’ Standards, and documents relating to trainees’ professional and subject knowledge enhancement.

p.3

Information about the employment-based ITE inspection

4. The lead inspector met with members of the partnership’s Strategic Management Group and checked all compliance requirements with the partnership manager. On school visits, inspectors held meetings with trainees, NQTs, RQTs, mentors and initial teacher training coordinators (ITTCs). Inspectors scrutinised centrally held monitoring reports from quality assurance visits, external assessor reports and evaluations from trainees, former trainees and mentors.

p.3

Information about the employment-based ITE inspection

5. One inspector observed a professional training session in a special school as part of the professional studies training in learning to teach disabled students and those with special educational needs.

p.3

Information about the employment-based ITE inspection

6. Inspectors also took account of the responses to the online questionnaire, completed by 39 trainees. January 2013

p.3

Inspection Team

Joanna Beckford-Hall HMI: Lead Inspector Peter Sanderson HMI: Assistant Lead Inspector

p.4

The key strengths of the employment-based partnership are:

 Consistently high outcomes for trainees who continue to excel when they join the teaching profession, both as NQTs and in progressing to leadership roles in partner schools.  High employment rates that exceed those typically found nationally and successfully support local recruitment and teacher retention in partner schools.  Outstanding coherence of the training course, challenging trainees to stretch themselves to attain consistently high quality teaching skills by the end of the course.  Trainees’ outstanding subject knowledge, their ability to teach disabled students and those with special educational needs and their high level of skill in promoting and reinforcing appropriate behaviour for learning.  Complementary school placements that provide fertile training environments for trainees, helping them effectively plan and teach students with differing learning needs.  Outstanding use of expertise in partnership schools to provide trainees

p.4

The key strengths of the employment-based partnership are:

and NQTs with high quality mentoring to support rapid and sustained progress, guiding trainees to become astute, highly reflective practitioners.  Excellent recruitment procedures used to select high calibre trainees who want to join, and remain in, the teaching profession.  Outstanding leadership of the partnership that combines high quality training in schools with a shared trust and a deeply embedded commitment to excellence in initial teacher training.

p.4

The partnership should:

 Ensure that all leaders and managers in partner schools have greater strategic responsibility for, and ownership of, driving course January 2013 improvements across the whole partnership and formally assess the impact of training in their schools.

p.4

The outcomes for trainees are outstanding

7. Since the last inspection, Mid Somerset Consortium has sustained high employment rates above those typically found nationally. The proportion of newly qualified teachers (NQTs) securing employment in partner schools is frequently above that of other employment-based providers. The provider effectively supports local recruitment needs and the high employment rates affirm the Mid Somerset Consortium brand of NQTs; highly competent, committed and enthusiastic teachers, able to teach at least consistently good and often outstanding lessons, and who progress well in their teaching careers.

p.5

The outcomes for trainees are outstanding

8. Mentors, ITTCs and senior leaders confirm that the calibre of NQTs trained through the Consortium continues to be high. Many graduates successfully complete their NQT year and go on to become mentors in their schools, always wanting ‘to give something back to the partnership’. Excellent professional development programmes in partnership schools provide NQTs and RQTs with training that enhances their teaching expertise and raises students’ achievement. Rapid promotion to middle and senior leadership roles is testimony to the quality of those trained by the Consortium. Capturing, analysing and celebrating the destinations and successes of alumni, by the partnership manager and her team, is increasingly robust.

p.5

The outcomes for trainees are outstanding

9. During the inspection, NQTs and trainees taught good and outstanding lessons. Training coordinators and mentors confirm the typicality of high quality teaching, in particular reporting how well trainees were working with students they had just met at the start of their second school placements. In one atypical instance, a lesson in an NQT’s second subject resulted in a less successful performance than expected. The NQT’s confidence, based on previously good teaching, was sustained by leaders’ quick actions to provide additional support.

p.5

The outcomes for trainees are outstanding

10. Trainees and NQTs plan lessons with good attention to levelling work for students’ differing needs. They know how to access and use information about students’ progress and targets to help them to improve. A key strength in their work is planning work for, and teaching, disabled students and those with special educational needs. This, coupled with trainees’ excellent skills in managing behaviour, ensures they establish high expectations for all students in their classes. Trainees’ subject knowledge is assessed comprehensively at the start of the course. January 2013 11. Support from knowledgeable subject tutors and mentors help trainees quickly address areas of weaker subject knowledge through subject development workshops and school-based research. As a result, trainees’ subject knowledge is strong. Trainees plan a range of stimulating activities to sustain students’ interest.

p.5

The outcomes for trainees are outstanding

12. Leaders strive to recruit the highest calibre of trainees and, as a result, sustain high completion rates. Very few trainees withdraw and when this does happen, it is mainly for personal reasons as opposed to course- related issues. The high percentage of mature trainees who join the course use their expertise from industry and their experience as learning support assistants, technicians or sports coaches to establish purposeful working relationships with colleagues and students. They are adept at managing their time to good effect. All trainees, including those who have much less previous experience in school settings, respond very well to guidance about how to improve their planning and teaching. Trainees become very reflective, thoughtful practitioners who seek out opportunities to develop their knowledge and experience in schools. Most NQTs and trainees can quickly analyse what they learn by shadowing students in lessons, seeing their behaviour in a range of

p.6

The outcomes for trainees are outstanding

classroom-based and practical subjects, and observing teaching in other subject departments. Trainees develop very good skills in planning and working with teaching assistants.

p.6

The outcomes for trainees are outstanding

13. The percentage of trainees attaining at an outstanding level by the end of the course has risen since the last inspection, reaching 64% in 2012. There is no discernible difference in the attainment of different groups of trainees, for example by gender, ethnicity or by trainees with a disability. Notable success has been achieved through increased subject- specific training sessions for chemists, biologists and physicists, helping to raise the provider’s outstanding profile and giving trainees greater confidence in teaching their non-specialist subject strand. Attainment in all other subjects continues to rise. Any slight variation in percentage by subject is attributable to often very small numbers as opposed to difference in the quality of training by subjects.

p.6

The outcomes for trainees are outstanding

The quality of training across the partnership is outstanding.

p.6

The outcomes for trainees are outstanding

14. The overall quality of the training is outstanding, enabling trainees to exceed the expectations of the Teachers’ Standards by the end of the training. Trainees leave the course equipped with the knowledge and competences required for a successful NQT year. Outstanding training successfully combines school-based training with an excellent range of complementary professional studies workshops and subject knowledge ‘upgrade’ sessions, all designed to prepare trainees for their teaching and wider professional role in schools. January 2013 15. Trainees and NQTs who met with inspectors reported very high levels of satisfaction with each aspect of their training. They spoke very positively about how the coherence and depth of the course impact on the quality of their teaching and their ability to reflect on and subsequently improve their practice. Such high quality is also is confirmed in very positive results to the Teaching Agency’s NQT surveys over the last three years

p.6

The outcomes for trainees are outstanding

16. Written assignments link directly to topical educational issues, requiring trainees to draw on published research, their observations and reflections in schools, and then apply what they have learnt to their teaching. This deepens their understanding of theory and practice and helps most trainees question why certain approaches may work in some settings but not in others. The use of topic-based conferences, such as those for learning how to teach disabled students and those with special educational needs, provides trainees with highly relevant understanding of legislation and very good training in planning for differing needs. Through a visit to a special school, trainees see first-hand how rigorous planning and teaching raise aspirations for, and expectations of, students with special educational needs, and many comment on how much this raises their expectations in their placement schools.

p.7

The outcomes for trainees are outstanding

17. The two-day conference for learning to teach students who speak English as an additional language (EAL) gives trainees experience of a range of teaching methods used in an inner city diverse school setting. This complements their training in two contrasting school settings. Compared to trainees’ ability to teach students with special educational needs, not all trainees are confident in working with students for whom English is an additional language. This aspect of the training is continually reviewed by trainers and leaders to find innovative ways of deepening trainees’ work with such students and in ethnically diverse settings beyond their placements in schools with mainly White British student populations. Trainees working in the independent schools in the partnership achieve very well when working with learners for whom English is an additional language.

p.7

The outcomes for trainees are outstanding

18. Trainees achieve extremely well in managing students’ behaviour. Highly competent trainees and NQTs sustain high expectations, helping their students make at least good progress in lessons. Professional studies sessions for behaviour management are of high quality and students report that these are very enjoyable. Trainees debate different approaches and use case studies to discuss how to meet the needs of students they teach who present particularly challenging behaviour. Contrasting school placements give trainees good opportunity to work with students who have behavioural, emotional and social difficulties. Trainees and NQTs have an excellent understanding of the critical January 2013 relationship between behaviour and students’ achievement in lessons and over time.

p.7

The outcomes for trainees are outstanding

19. The partnership draws on its own expertise to deliver many of the taught workshops, using advanced skills teachers as well as middle and senior leaders who bring contemporary issues to the forefront of the training. Trainees develop good understanding of bullying issues, particularly in relation to social media, as well as a secure understanding of child protection. Trainees evaluate the quality of each session, and the partnership manager, along with the ITTCs, annually reviews the content and sequencing of sessions to best accommodate ideas from trainees. Leaders quality assure a sample of these sessions each year, helping presenters develop their practice in teaching graduate trainees. Feedback given to presenters by leaders is extremely positive about content and delivery.

p.8

The outcomes for trainees are outstanding

20. Within school-based training and through the professional studies workshops, trainees develop a good understanding of teaching literacy and numeracy in their subject and understand how to use whole-school policies for literacy and numeracy. In a Year 9 physics lesson exploring static electricity, students used speaking and listening activities to give careful consideration to the correct use of scientific terminology. Students had many opportunities to work together to practise and further develop their understanding of these terms.

p.8

The outcomes for trainees are outstanding

21. Trainees and NQTs are overwhelmingly positive about the high quality of training in schools. Through individualised training plans, regular lesson observations and weekly mentor meetings, trainees receive oral and written feedback about strengths and areas for development in their teaching, referenced to the Teachers’ Standards. In weekly review meetings, mentors guide trainees to reflect on their progress and targets are set collaboratively. Feedback on the lesson observation forms is occasionally too dense because mentors try to include too much about each of the Teachers’ Standards as opposed to pinpointing key foci for lesson observations. Nevertheless, the analysis of strengths and areas for development in the oral feedback gives trainees clear guidance about how to improve their teaching. Leaders carefully track trainees’ progress through the range of assessment points, feedback from mentors and

p.8

The outcomes for trainees are outstanding

ITTCs in schools and through visits by externally appointed tutors.

p.8

The outcomes for trainees are outstanding

22. Trainees make rapid progress over the course, but the good and outstanding progress of trainees in the autumn term falters slightly for some trainees at the start of the second school placement. This is because not all trainees quickly receive incisive targets to know how to continue to improve their teaching in the contrasting school setting. January 2013 23. Assessment of trainees is accurate. The quality of training for mentors and ITTCs is good. This helps all school-based trainers review how to give feedback to trainees to sustain their progress and assess the quality of evidence against each of the Teachers’ Standards. The provider has introduced two new assessment points, ‘Progress Points 1 and 2’, which culminate in a final assessment and successfully help trainees exemplify how they refine evidence for the Teachers' Standards over time. Trainees find the moderation process by mentors, ITTCs and external

p.8

The outcomes for trainees are outstanding

assessors very useful in benchmarking their performance against criteria in the detailed course handbook. A few mentors and ITTCs rightly suggest that there is even more scope for developing models of best practice in the partnership by bringing trainers together more often in schools and developing further their role in strategic course improvement.

p.9

The quality of leadership and management across the partnership is

24. Described as inspiring, passionate and expecting the very best of trainees, the partnership manager leads the Mid Somerset Consortium with an energy and focus that helps everyone involved to support trainees to achieve extremely well. The vision for excellence is effectively communicated to trainees and all training partners; schools want to work with the Consortium and be part of a vibrant, well- regarded training partnership, which ensures high calibre NQTs join the teaching profession.

p.9

The quality of leadership and management across the partnership is

25. Leaders have sustained high quality outcomes since the last inspection and made further improvements to ensure that training is now outstanding. There is a clear trend of improvement in the proportion of trainees attaining at an outstanding level by the end of the course. Employment rates remain well above those found nationally and the high quality pastoral support and outstanding training help retain trainees on the course. The provider is fully compliant with all requirements for ITT.

p.9

The quality of leadership and management across the partnership is

26. The partnership’s Strategic Management Group regularly reviews how to improve the training course and the key priorities for improvement are derived from insightful self-evaluation. Feedback from ITTCs and current and former trainees helps leaders make decisions about the content and sequencing of workshops for the professional studies programme, making certain that trainees learn about new educational initiatives designed to help raise student achievement. Chaired by a deputy headteacher from one of the partner schools, the Strategic Management Group monitors and evaluates the quality of training across the partnership, using robust evidence from quality assurance visits by visiting tutors and external assessors. January 2013 27. The frequent well-focused visits by external assessors, combined with excellent work by ITTCs in schools, means that NQTs, trainees, and mentors receive high quality feedback to improve their work. Mentors

p.9

The quality of leadership and management across the partnership is

and ITTCs rightly praise the work of the external assessors and visiting tutors. Through joint observations of training, lesson observations and scrutiny of documents, assessors guide mentors’ and ITTCs’ professional skills in coaching NQTs and trainees to achieve very well. This builds successfully on good quality mentor training which supports mentors’ understanding of the new tracking system for trainees’ progress and the new lesson observation form. Leaders target their support to the needs of new and experienced mentors and quickly respond to feedback from ITTCs.

p.10

The quality of leadership and management across the partnership is

28. Members of the Strategic Management Group recognise that there is scope for the rich findings from many quality assurance visits annually and over time to be used to develop models of the very best training throughout the entire partnership. There is also potential for leaders and managers in partner schools to have greater strategic responsibility for, and ownership of, driving course improvements across the whole partnership.

p.10

The quality of leadership and management across the partnership is

29. Self-evaluation is accurate. It draws together quantitative and qualitative data giving leaders a sharp view of the strengths and areas for improvement. Leaders use measurable success criteria linked to outcomes for trainees more rigorously than at the time of the last inspection. Training partners understand their respective roles in driving improvement in weekly training and are held to account through quality assurance visits. The Strategic Management Group has not yet fully embedded a detailed understanding of key strategic priorities within every school, or asked schools themselves to review and report on the impact of their training as part of annual self-assessment.

p.10

The quality of leadership and management across the partnership is

30. The robust and demanding two-stage recruitment and selection process, highlighted as a key strength at the last inspection, remains. The provider continues to use senior leaders for interviews and ensures all prospective candidates are observed working with young people. This helps test candidates’ aptitude for teaching. The combination of two interviews, visits to schools to work with students, testing of literacy and numeracy skills, and candidates’ own self-assessment of their subject knowledge gives leaders a well-rounded picture which they use diligently in offering places to selected candidates.

p.10

The quality of leadership and management across the partnership is

31. Trainees comment favourably on the challenging recruitment process, setting the tone for the year ahead. Trainees confirm that high expectations are set at interviews so that they join the course under no illusion about demands on their time and the emotional resilience and January 2013 commitment needed if they are to become good or better teachers. Trainees rise to this challenge because good support for upgrading their subject knowledge, combined with detailed guidance for planning lessons, helps them make rapid progress in their teaching.

p.10

The quality of leadership and management across the partnership is

32. The small nature of the partnership, together with the strong collegiality of school leaders and the partnership manager, provides a secure, forward-looking team who keep abreast of changes in initial teacher education. Together they continue to remodel the consortium to serve the needs of trainees and schools locally. The partnership demonstrates outstanding capacity for further improvement. January 2013

p.11

The following schools were visited to observe teaching:

Crispin School The Castle School Huish Episcopi Academy Chilton Trinity School King’s School, Bruton Bridgwater Academy Haygrove Academy, Bridgwater January 2013

p.12

ITE partnership details

Unique reference number Inspection number Inspection dates Lead inspector Type of ITE partnership Phases provided Date of previous inspection Previous inspection report

p.13

ITE partnership details

Provider address 14–17 January 2013 Joanna Beckford-Hall HMI EBITT GTP 27 April – 1 May 2009 http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/inspection- reports/find-inspection- report/provider/ELS/70231 Mid Somerset Consortium Crispin School Church Road Street Somerset BA16 0AD

p.13

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion