Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 18 Feb 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Christine Inkster

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Christine Inkster

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+23Mostly positivemore positive than 36% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseenthusiasticsupportivestrengthseffectiveclear
Criticismweaknessesnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
701
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566855 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: gail.hill@cfbt.com

p.1

Mr Christopher Horn Headteacher King Street Primary School High Grange Road Spennymoor County Durham DL16 6RA

p.1

Education act 2005 to King Street Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 28 January 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Education act 2005 to King Street Primary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with the headteacher, other senior leaders, two groups of pupils, members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority. The school improvement plan was evaluated. A range of documents were scrutinised including pupils’ work, information on pupils’ progress, minutes of governing body meetings and reports from the local authority.

p.1

Context

Since the November 2012 inspection, a new Chair and Vice-Chair of Governors and two other governors have been appointed. Two part-time teachers and one teaching assistant have been appointed to provide additional support for pupils.

p.1

Main findings

The headteacher, deputy headteacher and governors show determination in making essential improvements to the work of the school and in tackling underachievement. The school improvement plan has been revised to focus on the areas for improvement identified in the recent inspection. The improvement plan contains well-focused objectives, actions and success criteria. However, specific milestones are not detailed enough for all groups of pupils so that progress can easily be measured.

p.2

Main findings

Subject and other leaders are enthusiastic and have worked hard to implement a range of new systems, procedures and initiatives. However, leaders need to sharpen their focus on the areas which require most improvement and make sure they have explicit evidence of impact and improvement for individuals and groups of pupils. There are not enough opportunities for leaders to check the work in their subjects or areas, particularly through lesson observations, although they have each undertaken a ‘learning walk’ and scrutiny of pupils’ work.

p.2

Main findings

Members of the governing body are supportive of the work of the school and are developing their skills in holding the school to account. The Chair of Governors has a clear understanding of the strengths and weaknesses in the school. However, the governing body as a whole does not yet have a structured approach to ensuring there are regular checks on the impact of the work of the school, particularly in relation to challenging the amount of progress made by pupils.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders and governors have begun to take effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommend that further action is taken to:

p.2

Main findings

 ensure the school improvement plan contains milestones which are specific to all groups of pupils so that progress can easily be measured  ensure all leaders have a sharper focus on the most important areas which require improvement and make sure that they can provide explicit evidence of the impact of their work for individuals and groups of pupils  improve the leadership skills of middle leaders by ensuring they have more opportunities to check the quality of teaching and learning in the areas for which they are responsible  review the governance procedures to ensure that governors more rigorously challenge the work of the school.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The headteacher has welcomed and benefited from support provided by the local authority, particularly from the Education Development Partner and the headteacher of a partner school who is a local leader of education. Support has also been provided for staff by Early Years consultants and the School Improvement Adviser. I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children's Services for Durham.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion