Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 18 Feb 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

James Sage

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    James Sage

  • Postcode verified

    BA11 2HQ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+8Mostly positivemore positive than 29% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseclearimprovingoutstandingmake good progressrigorousconsistentlysuccessfulaccurate
Criticismseriousweaknessesnot yetnot good enoughweaker

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings167w0
  • Leadership491w+8

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
649
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 24%Leadership 71%About the inspection 4%

Full report text

Mr Gavin Ball Frome Community College Bath Road Frome Somerset BA11 2HQ

p.1

College

Following my visit to your school on 22 January 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the outcome and inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

College

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses in October 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher, senior leaders and middle leaders, the Chair and three other members of the Governing Body, and a representative from the local authority. The local authority’s statement of action and the school’s improvement plans were evaluated.

p.1

Context

The school has started the process to become a sponsored academy in September 2013. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5373 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Direct email : Emma.Thomson@ tribalgroup.com

p.1

The quality of leadership and management at the school

 The headteacher took up post in September 2012 and introduced a very wide range of changes; he has a clear vision for improving the school. At the time of the inspection in October that judged that the school had serious weaknesses, many of these changes had not yet had sufficient time to have the intended impact.  At the time of this monitoring visit, it is clear that the changes introduced by the headteacher are making a significant difference. All of the changes are rooted in the need to raise students’ achievement by improving the quality of teaching.  Senior leadership team roles have been clarified to ensure a tight focus on improving teaching and raising achievement.  The monitoring of students’ progress is rigorous and there are close checks to make sure that this information is reliable and accurate. There are close checks on the progress of all groups of students, including those supported by the pupil

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

premium. Interventions and support are targeted on ensuring students make good progress, while not losing sight of the need to provide ‘wrap-around care’ for those with particular needs.  There is much greater clarity about what good, and better, teaching looks like and when it is not good enough. The professional development of teachers is focused relentlessly on the key factors that will lead to improving weaker teaching and making more teaching consistently good or outstanding. The impact of this is monitored systematically.  Procedures for the performance management of teachers are much more robustly applied and more closely aligned with students’ progress. Where teaching requires significant improvement, these teachers are given clear targets and individual action plans and they are provided with the support they need; however, the school makes full use of capability procedures where necessary. 

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school has reviewed the curriculum and has good plans for the next school year. The headteacher has been particularly successful in negotiating with the two partner middle schools to ensure accountability and the provision of good quality baseline information for students entering the school in Year 9.  The governing body is clear about what needs to be done to improve the school. They are better informed to hold the headteacher and the school’s senior and middle leaders to account. Governors have undertaken a skills audit, but this has not yet been fully analysed or acted upon to ensure that the governing body has the full range of skills necessary for them to carry out their role. This has been put on hold because of discussions about the change to become an academy.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made:

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school’s improvement plans are fit for purpose.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The local authority’s statement of action is fit for purpose. I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Somerset. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion