Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
James Sage
- Postcode verified
BA11 2HQ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- All of the changes are rooted in the need to raise students’ achievement by improving the quality of teaching. p.2
- The governing body is clear about what needs to be done to improve the school. p.2
- Interventions and support are targeted on ensuring students make good progress, while not losing sight of the need to provide ‘wrap-around care’ for those with particular needs. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 649
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Gavin Ball Frome Community College Bath Road Frome Somerset BA11 2HQ
p.1
College
Following my visit to your school on 22 January 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the outcome and inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
College
The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses in October 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During this inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher, senior leaders and middle leaders, the Chair and three other members of the Governing Body, and a representative from the local authority. The local authority’s statement of action and the school’s improvement plans were evaluated.
p.1
Context
The school has started the process to become a sponsored academy in September 2013. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5373 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Direct email : Emma.Thomson@ tribalgroup.com
p.1
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The headteacher took up post in September 2012 and introduced a very wide range of changes; he has a clear vision for improving the school. At the time of the inspection in October that judged that the school had serious weaknesses, many of these changes had not yet had sufficient time to have the intended impact. At the time of this monitoring visit, it is clear that the changes introduced by the headteacher are making a significant difference. All of the changes are rooted in the need to raise students’ achievement by improving the quality of teaching. Senior leadership team roles have been clarified to ensure a tight focus on improving teaching and raising achievement. The monitoring of students’ progress is rigorous and there are close checks to make sure that this information is reliable and accurate. There are close checks on the progress of all groups of students, including those supported by the pupil
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
premium. Interventions and support are targeted on ensuring students make good progress, while not losing sight of the need to provide ‘wrap-around care’ for those with particular needs. There is much greater clarity about what good, and better, teaching looks like and when it is not good enough. The professional development of teachers is focused relentlessly on the key factors that will lead to improving weaker teaching and making more teaching consistently good or outstanding. The impact of this is monitored systematically. Procedures for the performance management of teachers are much more robustly applied and more closely aligned with students’ progress. Where teaching requires significant improvement, these teachers are given clear targets and individual action plans and they are provided with the support they need; however, the school makes full use of capability procedures where necessary.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The school has reviewed the curriculum and has good plans for the next school year. The headteacher has been particularly successful in negotiating with the two partner middle schools to ensure accountability and the provision of good quality baseline information for students entering the school in Year 9. The governing body is clear about what needs to be done to improve the school. They are better informed to hold the headteacher and the school’s senior and middle leaders to account. Governors have undertaken a skills audit, but this has not yet been fully analysed or acted upon to ensure that the governing body has the full range of skills necessary for them to carry out their role. This has been put on hold because of discussions about the change to become an academy.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made:
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The school’s improvement plans are fit for purpose.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The local authority’s statement of action is fit for purpose. I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Somerset. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion