Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Joanna Beckford-Hall
- Postcode verified
LU7 0NY
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This is reflected well in the high quality work completed so far to review comments on lesson observation forms, train observers in giving precise and developmental feedback, and a revised, more robust appraisal system. p.2
- The headteacher is using his links with two outstanding schools to support the improvement plans for Cottesloe. p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The headteacher, senior leaders and governors are stating clearly and firmly that standards must rise and there must be greater accountability at every level of leadership. p.1
- Both school improvement advisers recognise an urgent need to offer additional support to make certain that the school development plan is quickly securing improvement. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 895
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 39, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Andy McBurnie The Cottesloe School Aylesbury Road Wing Leighton Buzzard LU7 0NY
p.1
Education Act 2005 to The Cottesloe School
Following my visit to your school on 25 January 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Education Act 2005 to The Cottesloe School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in October 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with the headteacher and senior leaders, members of the governing body and two representatives from the local authority. The new school improvement plan was evaluated and documentation about the performance management and professional development of staff was scrutinised. The headteacher also took the inspector on a tour of the school to discuss developments to improve teaching and learning.
p.1
Context
Since the section 5 inspection the acting headteacher has been appointed as the new headteacher of Cottesloe School.
p.1
Main findings
The headteacher has communicated effectively and with great passion a vision for rapidly driving improvement, with much higher expectations for students’ progress Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5373 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Direct email : jo-anne.harwood @tribalgroup.com and staff performance. The headteacher is using his links with two outstanding schools to support the improvement plans for Cottesloe. The headteacher, senior leaders and governors are stating clearly and firmly that standards must rise and there must be greater accountability at every level of leadership. A new, energetic pace of change is emerging. This is already being recognised by parents who are expressing their appreciation about the new headteacher’s appointment and his swift communication with them about raising expectations.
p.1
Main findings
The headteacher and senior leaders have responded quickly to the areas requiring improvement. They have devised a new school improvement plan to help leaders and other staff understand the strategic priorities for the school. The plan has precise targets for each area for improvement and clear success criteria to measure impact. It identifies clearly how leaders are taking more responsibility for improving teaching. Despite this, a few of the dates for checking impact are too far ahead. More regular and systematic review points are needed.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders are starting to overhaul teaching and develop a positive climate for developing best practice. This is reflected well in the high quality work completed so far to review comments on lesson observation forms, train observers in giving precise and developmental feedback, and a revised, more robust appraisal system.
p.2
Main findings
The governing body is forthright in its vision for how the new headteacher has to enable Cottesloe to become a good school within the next two years and how, in the new performance management system, all leaders will be similarly held to account. Senior leaders and governors are undertaking a full review of allowances within the teaching and learning responsibility structure. The governing body is planning to include more frequent reports from middle leaders at governor meetings. Governors are currently developing a better understanding of nationally expected progress data to test the impact of teaching against students’ progress.
p.2
Main findings
An external review of governance has not yet been undertaken. However, governors have begun to audit their skills to determine their training needs. The Chair of the Governing Body has made connections with national leaders for governance and is planning additional training for governors.
p.2
Main findings
With clear direction from the new headteacher, the senior leadership team and governors have begun to take effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection.
p.2
Main findings
Following the visit to the school, HMI recommend that further action is taken to:
p.2
Main findings
set more frequent check points in the school improvement plan to test out how well actions are securing improvement broker an external review of governance to support the governing body’s own skills audit ensure that the governing body use the Ofsted survey report, School governance: Learning from the best to develop how governors hold all leaders to account for improvement.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.3
External support
The local authority has recently started to work with the school to address the specific areas requiring improvement from the recent inspection. There has been limited work with the governing body to complete an external review of governance either with the local authority, by brokering support with a partner school, or by a Local Leader in Education. Both school improvement advisers recognise an urgent need to offer additional support to make certain that the school development plan is quickly securing improvement. A summary of four issues has been drawn up indicating how eight days of support by the local authority will be used. This document lacks sufficient detail about raising achievement and lacks specific time- bound targets for the local authority to evaluate whether the school is improving quickly enough. There is much greater scope for the local authority to audit governors’ skills and plan training for the governing body.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Buckinghamshire.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion