Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Hyde High School
Summary
Helen Gaunt (lead), Fiona Burke-Jackson, Janet Pruchniewicz, Sheila Kaye
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
25 Jan 2013
- Inspectors verified
Fiona Burke-Jackson, Helen Gaunt, Janet Pruchniewicz, Sheila Kaye
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Satisfactory
- Postcode verified
SK14 4SP
- Name on report verified
Hyde Community College
- URN verified
106268
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2006.
- Leadership and managementGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.7
- Leaders have high expectations and adopt a rigorous approach to checking students’ progress and the quality of lessons. p.1
- Students enjoy school and they are proud of it. p.5
- This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. p.7
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. p.7
- learning was less effective due to the poor behaviour of a small number of students. p.5
- School records show that, over time, the number of incidences of poor behaviour has been reducing, as has the level of exclusions. p.5
- They have a clear understanding about what constitutes an unsafe situation and are aware of the potential risks of using the internet inappropriately. p.5
- Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. p.7
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- While standards at the end of Year 11 are broadly in line with those found nationally, too few students make good progress from their Year 7 starting points, particularly in mathematics. p.1
- The quality of teaching is inconsistent across the school. p.1
- Teachers’ planning does not always result in every student receiving work that is challenging enough to enable them to make good or better progress. p.1
- Teachers’ questioning does not always allow students to develop their thinking or help them to become confident speakers. p.1
- This is because teachers too readily provide the answer or are satisfied with a one-word response rather than an explanation. p.1
- Teacher’s marking and feedback to students does not always show them how they are expected to improve their learning. p.1
- Although the school met the government floor standards in 2011 and 2012, there was a below average proportion of students who made good progress overall from the start of Year 7 to the end of Year 11. p.4
- Achievement is not yet good because teaching does not always challenge students enough. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 2,264
- shorter than usual (typical 3031)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 50, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 3
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Hyde Community College Old Road, Hyde, Cheshire, SK14 4SP
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Requiring Improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requiring Improvement 3 Quality of teaching Requiring Improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2
p.1
This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because
While standards at the end of Year 11 are broadly in line with those found nationally, too few students make good progress from their Year 7 starting points, particularly in mathematics. The quality of teaching is inconsistent across the school. Teachers’ planning does not always result in every student receiving work that is challenging enough to enable them to make good or better progress. Teachers’ questioning does not always allow students to develop their thinking or help them to become confident speakers. This is because teachers too readily provide the answer or are satisfied with a one-word response rather than an explanation. Teacher’s marking and feedback to students does not always show them how they are expected to improve their learning.
p.1
The school has the following strengths
This is an improving school. Since the previous inspection, senior leaders and the governing body have improved students’ behaviour and their progress in English. Aspects of teaching have also improved. Leadership at all levels is good. Leaders have high expectations and adopt a rigorous approach to checking students’ progress and the quality of lessons. Leaders have an accurate understanding of the school’s performance and know what needs to be done to improve it further. In recent years, leaders have worked with families and external agencies to successfully increase students’ attendance, which is now above average. Teaching and progress in the sixth form is good. Pupils who are known to be eligible for the pupil premium funding make good progress. Students enjoy coming to school. They behave well and say they feel safe. They are proud of their school and involve themselves in decision making and in supporting the community.
p.1
The school has the following strengths
Students value the help they receive from teachers and support assistants. It is a harmonious community in which everyone is valued equally. The governing body is aware of the school’s strengths and areas for improvement. Members provide strong support for the school, yet hold the leadership to account with rigour.
p.1
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed 41 lessons and 41 different teachers, including three joint observations with senior leaders. In addition, the inspection team made a number of shorter visits to lessons and visited the Alpha Centre (which supports vulnerable students) to observe small group sessions and 1:1 support. Meetings were held with senior and middle leaders, school staff, and three groups of students, representatives of the governing body, including the Chair of Governors and a parent governor, and a representative of the local authority. Inspectors took account of the 8 responses to the online questionnaire Parent View, the responses to student and parent questionnaires held by the school, and responses to the Ofsted staff questionnaire. Inspectors looked at the school’s work and took account of a wide range of documents including the school’s assessment data on students’ progress over time, minutes of governing body
p.2
Information about this inspection
meetings, monitoring documentation and records related to behaviour and safeguarding, reports of external reviews of the school’s performance, and the school’s website.
p.2
Inspection team
Helen Gaunt, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Sheila Kaye Additional Inspector Fiona Burke-Jackson Additional Inspector Janet Pruchniewicz Additional Inspector
p.2
Information about this school
This is a smaller than average-sized secondary school. Until September 2012, it was an 11-16 school. In September 2012, 37 students were admitted into Year 12 of a newly opened sixth form. This number is set to increase to 100 in September 2013. The proportion of students known to be eligible for free school meals is almost double the national average. At this school, pupil premium is used to provide extra support to pupils known to be eligible for free school meals, and a small number of students who are in the care of the local authority. The proportion of students supported through school action is lower than average. The proportion supported through school action plus or with statements of special educational needs is higher than that seen in most other schools. The proportion of students from minority ethnic groups is very high, as is the proportion that speaks English as an additional language.
p.3
Information about this school
In order to extend the range of subjects on offer, some students in Key Stage 4 and in the sixth form are taught off-site under a formal partnership arrangement with Tameside College. The school meets current government floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for students’ attainment and progress. A Hearing Impaired Unit, run and staffed by local authority employees, is housed in the school building. It is not run by the school and is not, therefore, included in this inspection. The school moved into a new building in January 2012.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality and consistency of teaching so that it is all at least good by: reducing unnecessary teacher talk that does not assist learning developing teachers’ questioning skills so that it extends students’ thinking, prompts them to talk about their learning, and boosts their confidence in their abilities ensuring that all teachers’ marking provides clear feedback to students about how to improve their work and reach the next level raising expectations and providing suitably challenging work for all students, especially for the more-able.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Accelerate students’ progress further and thus raise attainment across all subjects, especially in mathematics by: making better use of information about students’ progress to plan lessons that build carefully on students’ current understanding providing students with opportunities to apply mathematical skills in a wide, and more challenging, range of situations in mathematics lessons and in other subjects.
p.3
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
Although the school met the government floor standards in 2011 and 2012, there was a below average proportion of students who made good progress overall from the start of Year 7 to the end of Year 11. Achievement is not yet good because teaching does not always challenge students enough. When students’ work does not demand enough from them, their progress is not fast enough. This is most evident in mathematics. Since the last inspection, achievement in some subjects has improved. In 2012, students’ progress in English was comparable to that seen nationally, and students’ attainment in a range of vocational courses contributed positively to the overall standards they achieved. The school uses its pupil premium funding to fund additional staff, including literacy and numeracy coordinators, and provides additional reading support. Many students known to be eligible for free school meals have low reading ages on entry to the school. This additional
p.4
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
reading support helps them to develop better literacy skills, thus enabling them to make good progress. As a result, the gap in the average point score attained by these students and others in the school is narrowing. Pupil premium money has also been used to provide additional support (both in school time and after school) for students in danger of underachieving in English and mathematics and also helps to stop them from falling behind. Students for whom English is an additional language have the support of a bilingual teaching assistant. They have equal access to all subjects and achieve in line with their peers. Disabled students and those who have special educational needs are helped by the cross-subject approach to literacy, and also by tutors, teaching assistants and small group support within the Alpha Centre. Where they have support, they make progress in line with their peers. Progress is
p.4
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
slower when work is not adapted to be at the right level of difficulty for them. The sixth form is in its infancy. The first group of Year 12 students entered in September 2012. However, early indications show that learning and progress in the sixth form are good because of the high level of challenge presented to students. Students have been entered early for GCSE examinations in some subjects, including English and mathematics. This has allowed reorganisation of groups so that focused support can be provided. Early entry has helped some students’ chances of improving their grades. The school is in the process of amending its early entry strategy to ensure that more-able students are challenged to achieve the highest grade of which they are capable, as this has not always been the case in the past. The achievement of students attending Tameside College is in line with their peers because they
p.4
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
are able to study the courses that are most suitable for them.
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
Since the previous inspection, senior and middle leaders have focused on improving the quality of teaching. Expectations have risen and teachers’ work is now checked more often. However, there is still too much teaching that requires improvement. Teaching is better in Key Stage 4 and the sixth form than it is in Key Stage 3. In the most effective lessons, teachers use the information they have about students’ past learning to plan lessons that challenge them at the correct level, ensuring they make progress from the very beginning of the lesson. However, this information about students’ attainment and progress is not always used effectively enough. This means that work set for some students, in some classes, is still too easy. Another reason that work does not always demand enough of students is that teachers’ questioning does not always give them enough opportunity to deepen their understanding.
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
Sometimes teachers talk for too long at the start of the lesson; this means that active learning is delayed and students are not fully engaged. At other times, as was seen in mathematics, students do not have enough chance to apply their skills in different situations. In the sixth form, classes are usually small and teachers make good use of questioning at every opportunity. Consequently, students are more involved in their learning. In the best assessment and marking seen, students are provided with detailed comments that guide them to improve their work and extend their learning. Leaders have identified where marking is too infrequent, or does not help students to improve their work. This is now being addressed. Examples of good teaching included a Year 11 science lesson in which students were actively engaged as soon as they entered the classroom. The teacher explained what they were going to
p.5
The quality of teaching requires improvement
learn and demonstrated energy waves using a rope as a visual aid, which helped students to understand the concept. Students then had to find the information they needed by moving to different places in the room, where resources had been prepared for the differing levels of ability of the students. In this lesson, students were also encouraged to consider the quality of their partners’ work. Parents say that their children are taught well at the school, and inspectors saw signs of improving teaching in many subjects. Relationships between students and teachers are positive. Teachers’ subject knowledge is strong and they are friendly and encouraging, so students respond readily and willingly.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
The school succeeds in encouraging students to behave well. Students enjoy school and they are proud of it. The school is very inclusive and provides a caring environment. Attendance is above average, having risen steadily over the past five years. Leaders have worked hard with parents and external agencies to bring about this improvement. School records show that, over time, the number of incidences of poor behaviour has been reducing, as has the level of exclusions. Students understand about all of the different forms of bullying. They say that bullying is rare and that, if it does occur, it is dealt with swiftly and effectively. Students say they feel safe in school and that there are no areas or situations where they do not feel safe. They have a clear understanding about what constitutes an unsafe situation and are aware of the potential risks of using the internet inappropriately. Behaviour in lessons and around the school is good although inspectors saw one lesson in which
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
learning was less effective due to the poor behaviour of a small number of students. Students’ attitudes to learning are usually good. Students speak positively about the new behaviour policy, launched in January 2012, which incorporates a system of rewards and sanctions. Students make valuable contributions to their school community. They are actively engaged in decision making through the Student Cabinet. Students support one another as Young Carers, Rainbow Readers and Hotshots, and are involved in a range of charity fundraising activities.
p.5
The leadership and management are good
Since the previous inspection the headteacher, ably supported by senior leaders and the governing body, has driven forward the improvement agenda while, at the same time, successfully managing the move to a new building. Leaders have tackled the areas for improvement that were highlighted at the previous inspection. There have been a number of changes to staffing as decisive action has been taken to tackle underperformance. Leadership at all levels has been strengthened. There have been considerable improvements in the systems for tracking students’ progress. This information is now being used to check and improve the quality of teaching and to plan extra support and intervention. This is having a positive impact on students’ progress. Senior staff regularly check the quality of teaching and the progress that students are making Staff are held to account for the quality of their work, as well as being fully supported. Pay and
p.5
The leadership and management are good
career progression is firmly linked to levels of responsibility and effectiveness. There is a comprehensive programme of training and development available to staff. Middle leaders contribute to developing the quality of teaching within their areas. Staff are encouraged to share the good practice that exists. Leadership of the sixth form is strong and there are already over 100 applications for Year 12 for September 2013. Areas for improvement highlighted at a religious education subject inspection in June 2011 are being addressed and steady progress is being made in respect of these. The curriculum is constantly evolving to meet the needs of all students and makes a significant contribution to students’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development, and promotes equality of opportunity. Appropriate guidance ensures that students are well matched to courses and are kept safe. A good choice of extra-curricular and enrichment opportunities help develop students personally,
p.6
The leadership and management are good
adds to their enjoyment of school and enables them to prepare well for their next steps. The number of students who do not progress to education or employment at the end of Year 11 is low. Child-protection and safeguarding policies and practice meet current requirements. The school receives good support from the local authority and partnerships have been formed between the English and mathematics departments and two local secondary schools. As a member of the Manchester Challenge, the school is provided with support which has helped it to gauge its performance accurately. The governance of the school: Members of the governing body keep up-to-date, and have an accurate understanding of the school’s current performance. Governors put the safety, care, and personal development, of students high on their list of priorities. Governors know about the quality of teaching and how it links with the progress students are making, and provide support and challenge to leaders.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
Governors monitor the effectiveness with which pupil premium money is spent and how this is helping students in receipt of free school meals to make faster progress.
p.6
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.7
School details
Unique reference number 106268 Local authority Tameside Inspection number 400837
p.8
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Type of school Secondary School category Community Age range of pupils 11–18 Gender of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils in the sixth form Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 848 Of which, number on roll in sixth form 37 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Mr C Daly Headteacher Mrs D Spence Date of previous school inspection 15 March 2010 Telephone number 0161 366 7533 Fax number 0161 366 2676 Email address admin@hydecc.tameside.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.9
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.9
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.9
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion