Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Norfolk County Council in Norfolk
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
8 Jan 2013
- Inspectors verified
Louisa Bayley
- URN verified
SC068076
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 724
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC068076 Inspection date 08/01/2013 Inspector Louisa Bayley Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 09/05/2012 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Brief description of the service
This children’s home provides short-term placements and is owned and run by the local authority. It is registered for two young people with emotional or behavioural difficulties.
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress .
p.3
Progress
This home was judged as outstanding at the full inspection in May 2012, with no requirements or recommendations raised. Since that time, the home has made good progress in continuing to develop, supporting improvement in outcomes for young people.
p.3
Progress
The manager uses consultation with families, professionals and young people to gain an understanding of their views of the care provided. The feedback from the consultation has been positive. Young people say that staff always listen to them and support them in all aspects of their care. They say staff seek their views, consider and act upon them. The manager has made a number of changes as a result of consultation. Examples include, changes to the physical environment, such as new flooring and furniture.
p.3
Progress
Young people’s feedback from the In Care Council has led to action taken to address identified shortfalls. Many young people in short-term placements do not benefit from a holiday. The manager has identified this as a target within the development plan, with a focus on providing a short break for those young people who have been living in the home for more than three months. This has taken place for a young person, who enjoyed a fishing weekend away from the home, with a member of staff. This helps young people to feel valued and treated equally to those in longer term placements.
p.3
Progress
The manager and staff work well with a range of professionals to support young people’s needs and promote their safety and well-being. Strong relationships with the local police ensure there is a consistent, agreed strategy in place in the event young people go missing from care. Creative working with mental health professionals has led to recognition that some young people will access services and support if it is available in the home. As a result, individuals who had previously refused specialist health support have been able to engage, meeting their health needs.
p.4
Progress
The manager has implemented improved systems to identify individual’s needs through placement planning and risk assessment. Local and environmental factors, such as the ethnic majority are considered, with a focus on the likely impact on the individual being placed in the home. Consequently, young people’s needs relating to their ethnicity and culture are given due thought, informing their care planning.
p.4
Progress
The development plan clearly identifies the areas for improvements. The manager and staff have already met a number of the targets, supporting improvements in outcomes for young people. An example is the access to training for staff to enable them to use a secure information sharing system. As a result, young people are likely to be further safeguarded as staff knowledge is increased.
p.4
Progress
An area identified for improvement is to ensure that sanctions for poor behaviour are clear and are understood by staff and young people, promoting the likelihood of the sanction being effective.
p.4
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):
p.4
Recommendations
ensure that sanctions and rewards for behaviour are clear, reasonable and fair and are understood by all staff and children. (NMS 3.8)
p.4
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.5
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion