Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Adrian Guy
- Postcode verified
WN8 9TG
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 676
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 42, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
PROTECT-INSPECTION
CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566855 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: gail.hill@cfbt.com
p.1
PROTECT-INSPECTION
Mrs Stacey and Mr MacDonald Interim Headteachers Norman Pannell School Brownbill Bank Liverpool Merseyside L27 7AE
p.1
Education act 2005 to Norman Pannell School on 24 January 2013
Following my visit to your school on 24 January, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Education act 2005 to Norman Pannell School on 24 January 2013
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
The inspector held meetings with the two interim headteachers, three substantive leaders, with three members of the governing body and with a representative of the local authority. During the visit, Her Majesty’s Inspector evaluated the school’s improvement plans, looked at documents relating to teachers’ appraisal and the monitoring of teaching and learning and was taken on a tour of the school.
p.1
Context
Since the inspection, the headteacher has been on extended sickness absence. Two interim headteachers from a local school are currently overseeing this role. A newly qualified teacher took up post in January and another class is also being taught by a newly qualified teacher who is covering a maternity leave.
p.1
Main findings
The interim headteachers have acted promptly to draw up plans which identify clear actions for the required improvements in teaching and learning, leadership and improving pupils’ progress. These have clear criteria for success and identify the need to raise teachers’ expectations of what pupils can achieve. However, for longer term improvements the current plan does not have the necessary interim milestones for improvement which will help senior leaders and the governing body monitor the school’s progress.
p.1
Main findings
Leaders, governors and the local authority all agree that the priorities for improvement and the judgements reached by the inspection were the correct ones. The governing body has reinstated a challenge board in partnership with the local authority. The role of the monitoring group has been refocused to enable members to hold senior leaders to account for pupils’ progress and the improvements required by the action plan.
p.2
Main findings
The interim headteachers have not yet observed teaching in all of the classes in the school. This means, a detailed evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses in teaching, and of individual teachers, is not in place. Consequently those aspects requiring improvement are not clearly identified or closely linked to teachers’ performance management objectives.
p.2
Main findings
Substantive leaders are positive about the future of the school. However, this enthusiasm is not yet clearly focused on the ambition to drive improvement more rapidly. While they have undertaken monitoring activities these are not focused sharply enough on pupils learning and progress. The interim headteachers agree that a greater emphasis on the impact actions are having on the quality of pupils’ learning is needed.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders and governors have begun to take effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommend that he visits the school again and that further action is taken to:
p.2
Main findings
revise the school’s action plan to include measurable milestones, so that governors and senior leaders are able to easily measure the progress being made each term. develop the role of leaders so they have the skills to be key drivers of improvement and ensure their monitoring activities focus clearly on bringing about improvement in pupil’s learning and progress. ensure there is a clear overview of the strengths and weaknesses of teaching so that all teachers are clear about what they need to do to improve their teaching.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The local authority has acted swiftly to secure interim arrangements for the school’s leadership which has proved to be effective in developing plans to address the priorities for improvement. The local authority has put together a programme of support for subject leaders and will be monitoring improvements through the challenge board.
p.2
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Merseyside.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion