Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 13 Feb 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Anne Duffy

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Anne Duffy

  • Postcode verified

    RH17 6EN

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+11Mostly positivemore positive than 30% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveclearclearlystrengthsimprovingconsistentlytimely
Criticismweaknessesnot consistentlylacknot yetabsence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
650
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 50, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mrs P Kennedy Headteacher St Mark's CofE Primary School Brantridge Lane Haywards Heath RH17 6EN

p.1

Education act 2005 to St Mark's CofE Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 21 January 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Education act 2005 to St Mark's CofE Primary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in October 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with the headteacher and the acting assistant headteacher, members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority. The school action plan was evaluated. Documentation about teachers’ performance management and the use of the government additional funding, known as pupil premium, was discussed. The inspector joined the headteacher on a tour of the school to meet teachers and pupils.

p.1

Context

Following a period of staff absence, the senior leadership team of the school has been reorganised and now consists of the headteacher and an acting assistant headteacher. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 3115319 Direct F 0117 3150430 Direct email :matthew.parker@tribalgroup.com

p.1

Main findings

The headteacher has taken a clear lead in tackling areas for improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school’s action plan deals clearly with the areas identified for improvement. It contains challenging but achievable goals and is supported by a ‘timeline’ which is shared with staff. This is used by the headteacher to check that planned actions are being achieved on time. However, key dates on the timeline are not consistently recorded on the master action plan.

p.2

Main findings

The headteacher is ably supported by the governing body. Members have a very clear idea of the school’s strengths and weaknesses and are actively involved in visiting and reporting on the school’s progress. Governors are now recording progress and identified next steps on the action plan but these observations are currently undated. This, and the lack of key dates from the timeline, makes it difficult for governors to keep an overview of how quickly the school is improving.

p.2

Main findings

Comprehensive systems to set targets and monitor the progress of pupils in Key Stage 1 and 2 have been established. Targets for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage have not yet been included. The school is now more able to identity which individuals or classes are making the best progress and which may need additional support. Regular observations and reviews of teachers’ performance are being used well to help teachers understand more clearly what is expected of them. Senior leaders are aware that improving the quality of teaching remains a priority for the school.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders and governors are beginning to take effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommend that further action is taken to:

p.2

Main findings

 help the governing body to maintain an overview of progress by making sure that key steps and evaluations are consistently dated and recorded on the master action plan  include targets for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage within the whole school monitoring process.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The school is making good use of the support available from the local authority. This has been both timely and effective so far. Training is taking place for staff in school. Teachers are also visiting other schools to see different ways of working.

p.2

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for West Sussex. Yours sincerely

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion