Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 11 Feb 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Linda McGill

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Linda McGill

  • Postcode verified

    HR2 9PH

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+42Positivemore positive than 46% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingkeenenthusiasmpositiveeffectiveclearly
Criticismrequires improvementnot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
767
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 45
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mr Lee Batstone Madley Primary School Madley Hereford HR2 9PH

p.1

Education Act 2005 to Madley Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 01 February 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you, members of staff and the governing body made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Education Act 2005 to Madley Primary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection on 28 November 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I held meetings with the headteacher, deputy headteacher and subject leaders for English and mathematics, members of the Governing Body and a representative of the local authority. The school’s plan for improvement was evaluated and other documents were considered. Information about pupils’ current attainment and progress was examined.

p.1

Context

One new teacher joined the school at the start of this term. There have been no other changes to the school’s context since the inspection in November.

p.1

Main findings

A considerable amount of work has been done in a short space of time on all three of the areas for improvement. Staff and the governing body are keen that the school improves as quickly as possible and there is a sense of enthusiasm and a positive approach to change. Pupils’ progress is regularly checked; assessments of attainment and progress are now made every six weeks and the outcomes are analysed and discussed by the school’s leaders, the governing body and individual Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T :0121 679 9161 Direct email : ann.morris@serco.com members of staff. Next steps for groups and individual pupils are detailed in a raising attainment plan for each year group. Across the school, pupils’ progress is beginning to accelerate.

p.1

Main findings

The governing body has acted quickly to strengthen the ways in which it evaluates how well the school is doing and to increase the level of challenge; for example, a set of questions has been devised to guide their discussions about assessment information. Governors are working with subject leaders to evaluate aspects of provision. Training to deepen governors’ understanding of their role is planned.

p.2

Main findings

The school’s ambition is to be judged good by the time of its next inspection. The ‘requires improvement to good’ plan contains clearly quantifiable targets against which progress can be plotted. However, it is not clear that achieving these targets will mean that the school would be judged good at an inspection, and the timescale in which they are expected to be reached is not explicit, making it harder to judge progress towards them.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommend that further action is taken to:

p.2

Main findings

 strengthen the improvement plan by using the grade descriptions for good achievement in the inspection handbook to make sure that the targets in the plan match what is needed for achievement in English and mathematics to be judged good  review the timescale for ‘getting to good’ to make sure that it is achievable and include interim ‘milestones’ so that progress towards the targets can more readily be evaluated.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection. I will approach a school in another local authority with a view to sharing the ways assessment data is used to drive improvement. Please send me a copy of the data booklet after its Easter update. I will visit the school again during the summer term 2013 to work alongside subject and other leaders and to meet with members of the governing body.

p.2

External support

Senior and subject leaders have made productive links with good and outstanding schools both within Herefordshire and beyond, and are very keen to observe and learn from others’ practice.

p.2

External support

The local authority has provided a good deal of well-targeted support for teachers and the governing body and is keeping a close watch on progress. Monthly project group meetings are held to review progress. In the longer term, the level of support should reduce, so that the school’s leaders can demonstrate their ability to continue to evaluate progress and drive improvements themselves.

p.2

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Herefordshire.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion