Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
David Townsend
- Postcode verified
TR19 6HD
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 618
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 42, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr G Sweet Acting Headteacher St Levan Community Primary School The Bottoms Penzance Cornwall TR19 6HD
p.1
Education Act 2005 to St Levan Community Primary School
Following my visit to your school on Wednesday 23 January 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Education Act 2005 to St Levan Community Primary School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with the acting headteacher, representatives of the governing body, a class teacher and a representative of the local authority. The school’s action plans were evaluated. Records of monitoring activities were also examined.
p.1
Context
Since the inspection, there has been one staff appointment, to a teaching assistant post. The school is part of the Penwith Education Trust, a partnership of local schools. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5307 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Direct email : Emma.Thomson@ tribalgroup.com
p.1
Main findings
The acting headteacher and staff have responded positively to the judgements of the November inspection and are determined to improve the school’s performance to good. The school’s action plans have been revised to address the areas that need improvement. There is a clear focus on improving teaching by working to refine assessment and planning, including in mathematics, although strategies for developing pupils’ number calculation skills are at an early stage. The quality of teaching is closely monitored through ‘drop-in’ visits to lessons, checks made on teachers’ planning and pupils’ books, and through discussions with pupils about their learning. However, teachers do not receive detailed advice on how to improve their practice, including through regular lesson observations. Teachers are not held properly to account for the achievement of pupils in their classes.
p.2
Main findings
Governors are aware of the strengths and weaknesses in school and are active in planning to stabilise the long-term leadership of the school. They are keen to improve their skills and are welcoming of further support. Nevertheless, governors are not yet fully involved in evaluating the school’s improvement work. Whilst action plans do include criteria for governors to judge success, these are not closely linked to intended improvements in pupils’ achievement.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders and governors have begun to take effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommend that further action is taken to:
p.2
Main findings
develop effective approaches for developing pupils’ number calculation skills in mathematics ensure that teachers receive regular feedback on how to further improve their teaching and are held to account for the achievement of their pupils sharpen action planning by including numerical targets that help governors judge whether actions have been successful in raising pupils’ attainment clearly identify how governors will play an effective role in monitoring and evaluating the impact of the school’s actions review, with HMI, the impact of the school’s improvement work.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The local authority has provided clear support over time in establishing interim arrangements for the school’s leadership and consultancy advice to the acting headteacher. The local authority has also actively brokered effective links with other schools and provided consultancy advice in regards to early years provision.
p.2
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Cornwall. Yours sincerely
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion