Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 8 Feb 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Peter Sanderson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Peter Sanderson

  • Postcode verified

    BS14 9LS

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+86Very positivemore positive than 89% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisepositiveeffectivehigh expectationsrapid progresspositivelyknowledgeableimprovingclear
Criticismnot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
833
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Basia McLaughlin Headteacher St Bernadette Catholic Secondary School Fossedale Avenue Whitchurch Bristol BS14 9LS

p.1

Education act 2005 to St Bernadette Catholic Secondary School

Following my visit to your school on Thursday 24 January, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Education act 2005 to St Bernadette Catholic Secondary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with the headteacher and other senior leaders, four leaders of learning, the Chair of the Governing Body and three other governors. A telephone conversation was also held with a representative of the local authority. The school improvement plan was evaluated and the inspector also looked at documents used by leaders to monitor and evaluate the school’s work. The inspector also accompanied the headteacher on a walk around the school visiting six classrooms.

p.1

Context

One member of the senior leadership team has left the school since the previous inspection. Three middle leaders have recently been promoted to become associate members of the senior leadership team. The governing body has advanced plans for the school to become an academy by the start of the next academic year. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5307 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Direct email :matthew.parker@tribalgroup.com

p.1

Main findings

Leaders have reacted positively and quickly to the previous inspection report. The senior leadership team has been strengthened by the addition of three new associate members. Their brief is to support the drive to quickly address the areas for improvement identified at the last inspection. There is a positive climate within the school and all senior and middle leaders spoken to were committed to working towards the school being judged good as quickly as possible.

p.2

Main findings

The headteacher and other senior leaders have been pro-active in establishing a firm foundation to improve the quality of teaching. Good systems are in place to monitor teaching and appropriate levels of challenge and support are in place to improve teachers’ practice. Greater emphasis is being placed on planning work that is matched to students with different abilities and the effective management of behaviour. Good practice is being shared within the school and links are beginning to be established with other schools to improve practice. Tracking data provided by the school indicates that improving practice is beginning to have a positive impact on students’ achievement, particularly in mathematics.

p.2

Main findings

Systems to hold middle leaders to account for students’ progress have been reviewed and developed since the previous inspection. An audit of middle leaders’ skills has been undertaken and as a result, each middle leader has an agreed action plan to improve their performance. Systems to share good practice between middle leaders in the school have been established and links with middle leaders in other schools is being developed.

p.2

Main findings

Governors are knowledgeable about the school’s work. They have high expectations and ask suitably challenging questions to both middle and senior leaders. The previous plan for improvement has been reviewed and a new post Ofsted action plan has been developed. The plan addresses all aspects that were judged to require improvement and actions are appropriate and well-targeted. However, the success criteria are not always sufficiently measurable and linked to specific time scales so that the governing body can systematically evaluate the impact of the school’s work and ensure that it is making rapid progress to becoming a good school.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommend that further action is taken to:

p.2

Main findings

 Strengthen the school’s post Ofsted action plan by including more measurable success criteria against which the impact of actions can be more readily evaluated. It should be clear when these success criteria are expected to be achieved so that the governing body can more easily monitor the progress of the school to becoming good. Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection. I recommend that a further monitoring inspection is carried out at the start of the next academic year to access how well placed the school is to undergo its next inspection.

p.2

External support

Leaders have been proactive in seeking support from external partners and this is beginning to make a positive contribution to the school’s improvement. The local authority has provided some effective support which is assisting school improvement. For example, helpful support has been provided for the school’s leadership and for teaching in modern foreign languages.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Bristol.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion