Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 8 Feb 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Joanne Olsson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Joanne Olsson

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+19Mostly positivemore positive than 34% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentstrengthsimprovingeffectiveprecisely
Criticismweaknessesshortcomings

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
628
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566 937 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: jsimmons@cfbt.com

p.1

Mrs S Taylor Victoria Road Primary School Victoria Road Runcorn Cheshire WA7 5BN

p.1

Education act 2005 to Victoria Road Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 18 January 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Education act 2005 to Victoria Road Primary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with senior leaders, three members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority. The school improvement plan was evaluated and the school’s monitoring records were considered. The inspector was taken on a tour of the school to meet staff and pupils.

p.1

Context

There have been no significant changes to staff or the school’s organisation since the inspection.

p.1

Main findings

The school is addressing the issues identified at the recent inspection with gusto. There is no complacency which means the determination to become a good school pervades the whole building. The pace of change is brisk but measured which has captured the commitment of staff. The drive for improvement is underpinned by thorough planning, which is helping the school tackle shortcomings vigorously. Although there are relevant actions in place for improving governance, these do not match the precision and detail evident in the rest of the plan.

p.1

Main findings

Raising pupils’ achievement and improving teaching are top priority. Teachers’ skills are being refreshed because training is well matched to need and appropriate support is in place to help teachers who need extra help to improve. Aspirations have been raised so many teachers are being encouraged to improve their practice so it is better than good. Lessons are frequently observed and teachers benefit from expert feedback which identifies what they need to do next to become even better.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders have the support and commitment of the governing body. Governors have a greater insight into the work of the school because of the good quality information they receive and the clarity of the school development plan which is helping them to keep track of the school’s progress. Governors agree they would benefit from an external review of their effectiveness to help identify their strengths and weaknesses so future training is precisely matched to their needs.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommends that further action is taken to:

p.2

Main findings

 review the school development plan to ensure the actions relating to the governing body match the excellent quality in the rest of the plan  use the support of the local authority to commission an external review of the governing body so governors can identify their strengths and weaknesses and plan training accordingly.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The local authority is continuing to provide extensive support to the school. It is offering guidance to teachers and leaders as well as providing financial assistance to help the school make the best of their resources. Good use is being made of an external consultant to develop the role of other leaders.

p.2

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Halton.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion