Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 7 Feb 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Steve Isherwood

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Steve Isherwood

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−3Mixedmore positive than 23% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositivelyrigorouseffectivepreciselyclear
Criticismnot alwaysnot yetslownot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
606
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566932 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: hcarnall@cfbt.com

p.1

Mr Anthony Hadfield Headteacher Overleigh St Mary's CE Primary School Old Wrexham Road Handbridge Chester Cheshire CH4 7HS

p.1

Education act 2005 to Overleigh St Mary's CE Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 17 January 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Education act 2005 to Overleigh St Mary's CE Primary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with the headteacher, subject leaders, governors, a group of pupils and a representative of the local authority (LA). The inspector evaluated a range of documentation including: the school improvement plan, monitoring reports and action plans. In addition, the headteacher and deputy headteacher took the HMI on a tour of the school to look briefly at teaching and learning and the changes made to provision since the last inspection.

p.1

Context

There have been no significant changes to staff or the school’s organisation since the inspection.

p.1

Main findings

Senior leaders and governors accept that the areas for improvement from the recent inspection are the right ones for the school. As a group, they have responded positively to the school’s priorities and have taken immediate action to :  establish a more rigorous system for monitoring the quality of provision  improve the quality of teaching and accelerate pupils’ progress  develop the quality of pupils’ learning  strengthen the roles of middle leaders  increase teachers’ understanding of pupil progress data.

p.1

Main findings

The school improvement plan has been realigned and is suitably underpinned by separate action plans that identify completed tasks, evidence of impact and next steps. However, some of the planned actions within the plan do not have clear milestones or success criteria against which progress can be measured. This means it is not always clear how senior leaders and governors will ensure that the school’s actions are making a difference to pupils’ learning and their progress.

p.2

Main findings

Members of the governing body know why the school is not yet good. As a group, they understand what is being done to improve provision and are increasingly aware of the links between pupils’ progress and the quality of teaching. There is scope to increase their confidence to act as a critical friend and hold senior leaders to account.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommend that further action is taken to:

p.2

Main findings

fine-tune the school improvement plan to identify more precisely how the school will measure its success

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The LA recognises that its support for the school has been slow to emerge since the inspection in November. No training or planned action has taken place as yet. However, the newly appointed school improvement partner has clear plans in mind to better support the school in the months ahead. This includes training for governors and support for senior leaders and teachers.

p.2

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children's Services for Cheshire West and Chester.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion