Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Steve Isherwood
- Postcode verified
WN8 9TG
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Staff development2
“No training or planned action has taken place as yet.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 606
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566932 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: hcarnall@cfbt.com
p.1
Mr Anthony Hadfield Headteacher Overleigh St Mary's CE Primary School Old Wrexham Road Handbridge Chester Cheshire CH4 7HS
p.1
Education act 2005 to Overleigh St Mary's CE Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 17 January 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Education act 2005 to Overleigh St Mary's CE Primary School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with the headteacher, subject leaders, governors, a group of pupils and a representative of the local authority (LA). The inspector evaluated a range of documentation including: the school improvement plan, monitoring reports and action plans. In addition, the headteacher and deputy headteacher took the HMI on a tour of the school to look briefly at teaching and learning and the changes made to provision since the last inspection.
p.1
Context
There have been no significant changes to staff or the school’s organisation since the inspection.
p.1
Main findings
Senior leaders and governors accept that the areas for improvement from the recent inspection are the right ones for the school. As a group, they have responded positively to the school’s priorities and have taken immediate action to : establish a more rigorous system for monitoring the quality of provision improve the quality of teaching and accelerate pupils’ progress develop the quality of pupils’ learning strengthen the roles of middle leaders increase teachers’ understanding of pupil progress data.
p.1
Main findings
The school improvement plan has been realigned and is suitably underpinned by separate action plans that identify completed tasks, evidence of impact and next steps. However, some of the planned actions within the plan do not have clear milestones or success criteria against which progress can be measured. This means it is not always clear how senior leaders and governors will ensure that the school’s actions are making a difference to pupils’ learning and their progress.
p.2
Main findings
Members of the governing body know why the school is not yet good. As a group, they understand what is being done to improve provision and are increasingly aware of the links between pupils’ progress and the quality of teaching. There is scope to increase their confidence to act as a critical friend and hold senior leaders to account.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommend that further action is taken to:
p.2
Main findings
fine-tune the school improvement plan to identify more precisely how the school will measure its success
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The LA recognises that its support for the school has been slow to emerge since the inspection in November. No training or planned action has taken place as yet. However, the newly appointed school improvement partner has clear plans in mind to better support the school in the months ahead. This includes training for governors and support for senior leaders and teachers.
p.2
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children's Services for Cheshire West and Chester.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion