Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 7 Feb 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Joan Hewitt

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Joan Hewitt

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+82Very positivemore positive than 84% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingeffectivehigh expectationsimprovedmake good progresssuccessfullyeffectivelypositively
Criticismbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
784
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566862 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: rcowley@cfbt.com

p.1

Miss Linda Wallsgrove Headteacher University Academy Keighley Green Head Lane Utley Keighey BD20 6EB

p.1

Education act 2005 to University Academy Keighley

Following my visit to your academy on 17 January 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Education act 2005 to University Academy Keighley

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with the Associate Principal, the Executive Principal and Vice Principal, the Chair of the Governing Body and a representative of the sponsor. The school improvement plans were evaluated. The inspector toured the academy with the Associate Principal and spoke informally to students at lunchtime. Written feedback given to teachers following internal lesson observations was evaluated. The inspector also evaluated the academy’s information about students’ progress and the minutes from the meetings held by the governing body and the executive board.

p.1

Context

Since the time of the previous inspection the academy has appointed a new data manager. There have been no other significant appointments or changes in the academy’s context.

p.1

Main findings

The Associate Principal has successfully maintained the academy’s focus on improving the quality of teaching. Supported by the Executive Principal and senior leaders she is effectively setting high expectations. Most teachers are responding positively to their expectations but this is not true of everybody.

p.2

Main findings

The information teachers get about the progress students are making has been improved. Teachers now know exactly which individuals and groups of students are not doing as well as they should. Consequently, it is easier for them to plan work to meet the needs of individual students. Middle leaders are using this progress information to help them in holding teachers accountable for students’ progress.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders have established an intensive programme of support where teaching is less than good. This includes bespoke coaching and regular opportunities to see good and outstanding practice in other schools. The academy has sound plans for every teacher to visit a good or outstanding school. Leaders know that while teaching has got better the momentum of improvement must be sustained so that all groups of students routinely make good progress.

p.2

Main findings

The academy’s improvement planning is clear and focused on the appropriate priorities. The timings and the ways in which success will be measured are crisply outlined. It provides an effective foundation for improvement. The work on developing students’ reading, writing and speaking and listening skills is appropriate but it is not being embedded rapidly enough to improve students’ skills quickly.

p.2

Main findings

Members of the governing body and executive board have established links with different subject areas. By asking more searching questions and checking carefully, they are helping to ensure improvements are being sustained. They are developing ways of collecting more first-hand knowledge in regular visits to the academy during the school day.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders and governors and the sponsor are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommend that further action is taken to:

p.2

Main findings

 accelerate the improvements in teaching by making sure teachers are consistent in the way they use the new progress information to meet the needs of individual students  make sure students’ reading writing and speaking skills improve quickly across all subjects.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The academy continues to make effective use of the support offered by the sponsor and the Bradford Partnership. Leaders particularly value the partnerships it has brokered with other schools. For example, the Bradford Partnership has secured places for leaders in mathematics and English to attend extra training which has improved their skills in evaluating teaching. I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and as below.

p.2

Her Majesty's Inspector

The letter should be copied to the following:

p.3

Her Majesty's Inspector

 Appropriate authority - Chair of the Governing Body/Interim Executive Board  Local authority  the academy chain where relevant  Diocese - for voluntary aided and voluntary controlled schools  The Education Funding Agency (EFA) if the school has a sixth form  The person or body responsible for appointing foundation governors if the school has a foundation  The lead inspector.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion