Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Chris Wood
- Postcode verified
GU14 9BY
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 523
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Peter Collins Fernhill School & Language College Neville Duke Road Farnborough GU14 9BY
p.1
Special measures monitoring inspection of Fernhill School
Following my visit to your school on 10 January 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Special measures monitoring inspection of Fernhill School
The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures following the inspection which took place in September 2012.
p.1
Evidence
During this inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher, the senior leadership team, the Chair and Vice Chair of the Governing Body and a representative of the local authority. The local authority’s statement of action and the school’s improvement plan were evaluated.
p.1
Context
The roles and responsibilities of senior leaders and some middle leaders have been revised since the last inspection. An assistant headteacher now leads the English department. A new head of English has been appointed for June 2013. A seconded deputy headteacher has been supporting the school, on a part-time basis, to improve data and assessment systems. The governing body has been restructured and there are a number of new governors. The Chair of Governors was appointed in November 2012. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5319 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Direct email :matthew.parker@tribalgroup.com
p.1
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The headteacher has a clear vision for rapid and sustainable improvement. This is shared by senior leaders and members of the governing body. Together, they have already taken decisive action to bring about such improvements. A thoughtful restructuring of leadership roles and responsibilities has enabled leaders to focus more rigorously on the school’s priorities. Systems across the school are improving; stronger leadership of performance management and professional development is strengthening accountability and increasing teachers’ knowledge and skills. Leaders have involved staff in decision-making processes. This has resulted in a better understanding of, and commitment to, the important changes that are being made. For example, staff welcomed the recent changes to the timings of lessons and the full review of the timetable, intended to improve the quality of learning and levels of student engagement. Members of the governing body understand which aspects of
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
the school’s work need to improve most urgently and are now more fully involved in monitoring these areas. Leaders work closely with the local authority so that the development work with local authority advisers and external consultants is coherently managed and carefully evaluated. The local authority statement for action and the school’s improvement plan are fit for purpose. Minor changes to the published success criteria are needed. These will strengthen the monitoring of the area for improvement that relates to student engagement.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
Following the monitoring inspection, the following judgements were made:
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The local authority statement of action is fit for purpose.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The school’s improvement plan is fit for purpose.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The school may not appoint newly qualified teachers before the next monitoring inspection.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body, and the Director of Children’s Services for Hampshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion