Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Aspris Care Central Limited in Norfolk
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
18 Dec 2012
- Inspectors verified
Elaine Cray
- URN verified
SC379357
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The interim managers have an excellent knowledge of the legal framework. p.3
- Young people thrive and develop in a structured yet nurturing environment that respects individuality. p.4
- Both these homes have received outstanding judgements and these managers’ experience and expertise has greatly impacted on the improvements for this service. p.3
- Robust and effective monitoring processes promote embedded improvements in the home. p.3
- Managers effectively assess staffing arrangements with improved rotas that now show the planned and actual staffing arrangements in the home. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection. p.3
- Leadership and management were inadequate at the last inspection. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance8
“Leadership and management were inadequate at the last inspection.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 843
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 38, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC379357 Inspection date 18/12/2012 Inspector Elaine Cray Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 02/05/2012 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Brief description of the service
This home is part of a large private children's care organisation and is registered to accommodate three young people with emotional and behavioural difficulties. The home offers short, long-term and emergency placements. The home has a school on site, and this is registered with the Department for Education.
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress .
p.3
Progress
At the last inspection in May 2012, the overall quality rating for the home was adequate. The majority of shortfalls related to the management and administration in the home. Leadership and management were inadequate at the last inspection. There were eight requirements and nine recommendations set because of shortfalls.
p.3
Progress
There are significant improvements in the home and shortfalls are fully addressed. The Registered Manager has been absent from the home for several weeks and is now no longer in post at the service. Interim management arrangements are in place and effective.
p.3
Progress
The deputy manager for the home is in charge with daily input from two Registered Managers from other homes in the company. Both these homes have received outstanding judgements and these managers’ experience and expertise has greatly impacted on the improvements for this service.
p.3
Progress
Robust and effective monitoring processes promote embedded improvements in the home. The interim managers have an excellent knowledge of the legal framework. They carry out regular management checks against this legal framework and benchmark outcomes against Ofsted’s evaluation schedule. There are also comprehensive monthly checks by an independent visitor. Internal and external monitoring now includes proactive consultation with young people. There is a strong emerging ethos to maintain and further improve the good standards in the home.
p.3
Progress
Staff now have a high level of satisfaction with the leadership and management in the home. Young people are safe and looked after because staff now have a clear understanding of their roles and responsibilities. Expectations of staff are clear and performance is now monitored with effective lines of accountability. Managers effectively assess staffing arrangements with improved rotas that now show the planned and actual staffing arrangements in the home.
p.4
Progress
The home is managed well because administration and recording procedures are now more organised and effective. Young people’s care planning and progress are now assessed using files that contain all required information. Records are accurate and contemporary. Young people understand and are a key part of the assessment and review of their written plans.
p.4
Progress
Improved management procedures positively affect outcomes for young people because staff have considerably more time to spend with them. Staff report improved levels in motivation. They are more enthusiastic about and focused on their roles and responsibilities. They feel more empowered because they receive good support and development and are fully involved in the running of the home.
p.4
Progress
Staff enthusiasm feeds directly into outcomes for young people. They also report high levels of satisfaction with their relationships with staff. While there have been changes in staffing, the young people say living in the home is good because the managers and staff listen to them.
p.4
Progress
Young people value the improvements they have made to their behaviour. They have developed good negotiation skills. Trust and personal responsibility are important concepts to the young people. Sanctions and physical interventions are very rarely used, and only as a very last resort. Young people are fully involved in their care planning and drawing up strategies to manage risks and improve safety. They feel empowered and valued, resulting in a significant reduction in risk taking behaviours.
p.4
Progress
Young people progress in education because they receive high levels of support, encouragement and reward. One young person now attends college in the community; another has a part-time job in addition to attending and doing well in school. Young people enjoy a range of activities. They grow in maturity and embrace opportunities to become more independent with positive plans for their future.
p.4
Progress
Young people thrive and develop in a structured yet nurturing environment that respects individuality. They have good opportunities to understand their backgrounds, develop emotional resilience and positively express their identities.
p.4
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.5
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion