Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 22 Jan 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Philip Mann

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Philip Mann

  • Postcode verified

    LU7 3LZ

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+28Mostly positivemore positive than 39% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveclearlyimprovingclearsecure
Criticismnot effectivelylowerabsence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
559
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 33, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mrs F Godfrey Headteacher Leedon Lower School Highfield Road Leighton Buzzard LU7 3LZ

p.1

Education act 2005 to Leedon Lower School

Following my visit to your school on 11 January 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Education act 2005 to Leedon Lower School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in 14 November 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with the headteacher, other senior and middle leaders, representatives from the governing body, a representative of the local authority and a commissioned school improvement professional. The school improvement plan was evaluated alongside a range of other self-evaluation and monitoring documents.

p.1

Context

There have been no changes to the staffing since the previous inspection. There are currently two vacancies on the governing body.

p.1

Main findings

A detailed action plan provides an appropriate framework for school improvement. Responsibilities are clearly identified within specific timescales to facilitate school Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0121 679 9160 Direct email :antony.grace@serco.com improvement. However, the absence of specific targets linked to pupil performance means that the school cannot effectively measure its success.

p.1

Main findings

Discussions with senior and middle leaders confirm a much sharper focus on improving the quality of teaching and the achievement of pupils in all classes. The effective identification of those pupils who are currently underperforming provides a baseline to target specific resources and tailor teaching more closely to their individual needs. All staff with a leadership role participate in the monitoring of learning activity within their areas of responsibility. Future training is planned to give all middle leaders the skills to observe lessons in order that they may play a greater role in monitoring pupil progress and teacher performance. A National Leadership governor has worked closely with the governing body to provide a specific training programme for all governors in the use of data and monitoring the work of the school.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders and governors have begun to take effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommend that further action is taken to:

p.2

Main findings

 ensure that targets within the action plan are sufficiently challenging to raise standards further in English and mathematics

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection. HMI recommends that a further monitoring visit takes place alongside school leaders to review the quality of teaching and learning across the school.

p.2

Main findings

The local authority provides appropriate levels of support and guidance to staff and governors including specific training for teachers and governors through a clear statement of action. Local authority improvement officers and a commissioned school improvement professional maintain a close overview of the school to ensure that it quickly tackles the key issues from the inspection to secure the necessary improvements in pupils’ outcomes.

p.2

Main findings

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Central Bedfordshire.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion