Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Nottinghamshire Training Group

Inspected 13 Dec 2012 · published 22 Jan 2013 · URN 54810

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Cliff Rose

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    13 Dec 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Cliff Rose

  • Name on report verified

    The Bassetlaw Training Agency Limited

  • URN verified

    54810

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+14Mostly positivemore positive than 32% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyskilfullyhigh expectationsimprovedclearvery highgood progresswell-planned
Criticismnot outstandingnot yetrequires improvementnot sufficientlylowinsufficientlygapslimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings255w−15
  • What needs to improve1760w+34

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,966
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 30, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 10%What needs to improve 72%About the inspection 18%

Full report text

Learning and Skills inspection report Date published: 22 January 2013 Inspection Number: 408407 URN: 54810

p.1

Summary of key findings for learners

 A wide and comprehensive range of quality work placements meets the needs and interests of learners. Learners are very positive about their work placement experiences and receive good support from employers to gain confidence and develop skills which enhance their employment prospects.  The curriculum successfully prepares learners for progression into work place learning by offering individual programmes and qualifications to support employability skills. Initial assessment is thorough and accurately identifies learners’ needs. Well managed regular reviews of learners’ progress are used very effectively to track and sustain learning in the workplace. Reviews are responsive to learners’ needs, timely, systematic and well-structured to support progression.  The provider and workplace supervisors have high expectations for the majority of learners. They set challenging targets with clear deadlines for completion and are well supported by both

p.1

Summary of key findings for learners

 Outcomes are mainly good but not yet outstanding. In particular, the proportion of learners progressing onto other training or into employment requires improvement.  Teaching, learning and assessment are mainly good and are not yet outstanding.  The recording and assessment of non-accredited learning is underdeveloped and not sufficiently well structured to monitor progress over time and provide a reliable measure of progress from the learners’ starting points.  Leadership and management are mainly good but are not yet outstanding. It is too early to judge the full impact of some recent initiatives and both the accuracy and use of management information require improvement.

p.1

This inspection: Good-2

Previous inspection: Satisfactory-3 Outcomes for learners Good-2 Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good-2 Effectiveness of leadership and management Good-2

p.1

What does the provider need to do to improve further?

 Further improve learners’ rate of progression into employment or further education by working with other local providers and agencies to overcome barriers posed by family or community pressures.  Increase the amount of good teaching, learning and assessment by further developing the planning of learning to specifically identify opportunities that relate to functional skills improvement. Make stronger links with vocational learning placements to identify naturally occurring situations at work to reinforce English and mathematical skills.  Further develop the recording of progression of learning goals declared by learners at the initial self-assessment stage. Systematically track development at reviews, provide clear feedback on the development of non-accredited learning and relate this to work place learning.  Give detailed feedback to learners on how their work can be further improved by focusing on

p.2

What does the provider need to do to improve further?

specific areas of development, in addition to the correction of spelling and grammar.  Develop workplace learning records in partnership with employers to support reflective learning identifying social skills, personal organisational learning, problem solving and progress made relative to starting points and learning goals.  Use data as a management tool to evaluate fully the impact of the achievement and progression of all learners and to identify any achievement gaps. Evaluate current strategies to engage and promote wider participation of male learners. Evaluate learners’ knowledge of equality and diversity in more depth at reviews.

p.2

Inspection judgements

 The proportion of learners that progress to further education, apprenticeships or employment is satisfactory and improving. At the start of the Foundation Learning programme retention was very low but has improved year on year since then. The progression rate for those retained is high.  A high proportion of learners who are interested in child care progress either directly into employment or onto higher level training in this sector.  The achievement of vocational qualifications in child care is high. For some qualifications such as health and safety and manual handling the achievement rate is very high. Most current learners working toward vocational qualifications are making good progress. There are no identified differences in the achievements of different groups of learners.  Learners make satisfactory progress in functional skills. Most start from a very low level, develop their skills in mathematics, English and information and communication technology and are

p.2

Inspection judgements

entered for accreditation at the level most appropriate for them, where pass rates are high. Some become so enthused that they continue to attend classes even after they have left the programme.  Learners develop good employability skills. They gain in self-confidence and the ability to communicate effectively. They recognise the value of functional skills in supporting their progression. They also learn the importance of regular attendance and punctuality. The quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

p.2

Inspection judgements

 Teaching, learning and assessment are good and are reflected in improving achievement and progression rates. Tutors structure and sequence learning carefully to meet individual needs, reinforce key objectives and acknowledge prior learning. Learners draw on their own practical experiences to support their development of knowledge concepts and attitudes. For example, in a customer services session equality and diversity were related skilfully to the learners’ current workplace. Frequent and specific references are made to work-related situations supporting links from theory to practice. Good associations are made to relevant work placements to reinforce key objectives. Learners receive regular praise and feedback in sessions.  The provider uses an extensive range of employers across a wide spectrum of vocational activity to provide learners with valuable work experience. Learners are carefully matched to

p.3

Inspection judgements

appropriate placements to meet their individual needs and interests, develop confidence and employability skills. Placements are arranged quickly after the initial assessment. Work placements are used to break down barriers to learning, change perceptions about learning and raise expectations of achievement. Employers comment on the good communication and prompt support given to sustain learners in placements.  Employers are highly supportive of learners and value their contributions in their work place. Further training and learning routinely goes beyond the statutory requirements of the employer. Learners are prepared well to undertake job roles and are fully integrated into the workforce. Reviews of progress towards the achievement of qualifications are regular and thorough, challenging targets are set and systematically monitored to keep learners on track. However the monitoring of more general employability skills is underdeveloped and requires improvement to

p.3

Inspection judgements

fully measure progress against staring points.  Staff use their expertise well in planning to meet individual needs. Expectations of learners are high and good behaviour is encouraged. Attendance is closely monitored and particular attention is given to safeguarding vulnerable individuals. Independent learning is encouraged and transport to work is supported where appropriate.  Assessment of learning is detailed with clear guidance given to learners. Progress through the programme is carefully monitored. However although assessment includes corrections of spelling and grammar, the marking of written formative assessments is insufficiently detailed to provide feedback and encouragement to consolidate learning.  Initial assessment is comprehensive and systematic. Effective guidance leads to learners being placed with appropriate employers who are sensitive to the learners’ needs. Support is timely,

p.3

Inspection judgements

breaks down barriers to learning and improves self- confidence. Individual learning plans are well structured; challenging targets are set and links are made from assessment outcomes to plan learning for qualifications and workplace achievements.  Learners value highly the regular reviews and the close monitoring of their progress. They show ambition to improve and change their circumstances often against a family and community culture of benefit dependency. Tutors skilfully break down barriers to attainment and work responsively with partners to provide services to support mental health and counselling needs.  The development of functional skills is satisfactory. Learners start their programmes with low levels of academic attainment in mathematics and English and appreciate the value that these subjects have in support of their progression to other levels of learning. Teaching and learning plans include functional skills at a general level in vocational areas but do not make specific

p.3

Inspection judgements

reference to learning sessions or workplace activity.  Advice and guidance appropriately places learners on suitable programmes. The need to attract learners from under-represented groups is recognised. Female learners out number male learners. Strategies to attract male learners remain largely unsuccessful.  Equality and diversity are well promoted. The understanding and advancement of equality and diversity are taught well and skilfully contextualised to the work place. However reviews do not sufficiently reinforce this learning through detailed questioning to test knowledge.

p.3

Inspection judgements

The effectiveness of leadership and management Good

p.4

Inspection judgements

 Directors demonstrate good strategic planning. They recently sought out other small work- based learning providers and founded a consortium in order to minimise the loss of income that would have otherwise occurred had their apprenticeship contracts been moved to other larger providers. Managers also restructured The Bassetlaw Training Agency Limited (BTA) and internally reinforced the links between apprenticeship and foundation learning programmes.  BTA’s quality manager works closely with those from other providers in the new apprenticeship consortium to produce common quality improvement arrangements such as policies, procedures and audits, drawing on the best practices they identify. BTA staff then apply these arrangements to the Foundation Learning programme. Consequently new policies and documented procedures are comprehensive and up to date; however it is too early to judge the full impact of these

p.4

Inspection judgements

changes.  The new observation of teaching and learning arrangements, which form part of the quality improvement arrangements above, include a greater focus on learning, joint observations and regular moderation between organisations to standardise grading judgments and post- observation action planning.  Curriculum management is good. The well-planned curriculum focuses on extensive work experience with appropriate attention to functional skills and opportunities to pursue vocational qualifications as well as overcoming barriers to progression. The provider maintains links with over 500 local employers to ensure that learners can benefit from work experience placements best suited to their stage of development.  Staff engage effectively in the well-established self-assessment process. Each department monitors and modifies its quality improvement plan throughout the year before using it to produce its self-assessment report, which senior managers incorporate into an overall report.

p.4

Inspection judgements

The report produced immediately before inspection was written against the new common inspection framework and was largely accurate.  Managers do not make sufficient use of data to monitor performance of the Foundation Learning programme, set targets for the programme or to identify differences in achievement between groups of learners. BTA’s management information system was designed for apprenticeship programmes and does not readily produce data in the most useful format for the management of the Foundation Learning programme.  The promotion of equality and diversity is good. Policies are comprehensive and up to date and implemented well. BTA’s Foundation Learning programme caters for young people from an area of high deprivation, many of whom have previously low levels of academic achievement and multiple barriers to learning. Staff help learners to combat harassment and bullying. They challenge stereotyping and encourage learners to consider careers which they might otherwise

p.4

Inspection judgements

have dismissed as inappropriate to their gender.  The provider meets its statutory requirements for safeguarding learners. Policies and procedures are comprehensive with an appropriate particular emphasis on child protection. Staff have a good awareness and knowledge of reporting procedures.

p.4

on a provider’s performance:

1: Outstanding 2: Good 3: Requires improvement 4: Inadequate

p.5

Overall

14-16 Learning programmes 16-18 Learning programmes 19+ Learning programmes Apprenticeships Other work- based learning Employability Foundation Learning Community learning

p.5

Overall

The quality of teaching, learning and assessment 2 2

p.5

Overall

The effectiveness of leadership and management 2 2

p.5

The Bassetlaw Training Limited

Type of provider Independent learning provider

p.6

full contract year

Principal/CEO Mrs Sylvia Lilley Date of previous inspection July 2010 Website address www.btadirect.co.uk

p.6

programme level

Level 1 or below Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 and above

p.6

(excluding apprenticeships)

Full-time 32 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Part-time 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

p.6

Apprenticeship level and age

Intermediate Advanced Higher 16-18 19+ 16-18 19+ 16-18 19+ N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

p.6

Apprenticeship level and age

Number of learners aged 14-16 N/A Number of community learners N/A Number of employability learners N/A Funding received from Education Funding Agency (EFA)

p.6

Additional socio-economic information

The Bassetlaw Training Agency Ltd operates from its premises, a former primary school and Headteacher’s house in Worksop. The firm also owns and operates a childcare establishment in the area. Until recently it had a direct contract funded by the Skills Funding Agency to offer apprenticeships in business administration, customer service and childcare which it now offers under subcontract with a consortium of which it is a member. The immediate area is one of the most deprived in the country with high youth unemployment and low levels of qualification among the population.

p.7

Information about this inspection

One of Her Majesty’s Inspectors (HMI) and one additional inspector, assisted by the Foundation Learning Programme Coordinator as nominee, carried out the inspection with short notice. Inspectors took account of the provider’s most recent self-assessment report and development plans, and the previous inspection report. Inspectors also used data on learners’ achievements over the last three years to help them make judgements. Inspectors used group and individual interviews, and online questionnaires to gather the views of learners and employers; these views are reflected throughout the report. They observed learning sessions, assessments and progress reviews. The inspection took into account all of the directly funded provision at the provider. Inspectors looked at the quality of teaching, learning and assessment across the provision and graded the sector subject area listed in the report above.

p.7

Grade Judgement

Detailed grade characteristics can be viewed in the Handbook for the inspection of further education and skills 2012, Part 2:

p.8

Grade Judgement

http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/resources/handbook-for-inspection-of-further-education-and-skills- september-2012

p.8

Grade Judgement

guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

Grade Judgement

Learner View is a new website where learners can tell Ofsted what they think about their college or provider. They can also see what other learners think about them too.

p.8

Grade Judgement

To find out more go to www.learnerview.ofsted.gov.uk or if you have any questions about Learner View please email Ofsted at: achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

Grade Judgement

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and provider inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.9

Grade Judgement

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion