Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 18 Jan 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jane Melbourne

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jane Melbourne

  • Postcode verified

    CV22 6LB

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+73Very positivemore positive than 72% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiserapid progressambitioushigh qualityrigorousclearsecureeffectiveeffectively
Criticisminconsistencies

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
775
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Andrew Edwards Headteacher Bilton CofE Junior School Plantagenet Drive Bilton Rugby CV22 6LB

p.1

Education act 2005 to Bilton CofE Junior School

Following my visit to your school on 10 January 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Education act 2005 to Bilton CofE Junior School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with the headteacher, other senior leaders, five members of the Governing Body including the Chair of Governors and a learning improvement officer from the local authority. The school learning improvement plan was evaluated. A tour of the school was undertaken with the headteacher and deputy headteacher and pupils’ work in books was sampled across all year groups. The management of the performance of staff in raising progress and achievement was discussed.

p.1

Context

There have been no significant contextual changes within the school since the section 5 inspection which judged the school to require improvement. The acting deputy headteacher has been permanently appointed to the post and is non- Serco Inspections Cedar House 21 William Street Edgbaston Birmingham B15 1LH T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk classroom based from this term. Pupils are no longer placed in sets linked to ability for literacy or numeracy following the last inspection.

p.1

Main findings

Work undertaken to improve the school is ambitious and appropriately prioritised. Staff and members of the Governing Body have worked well as a team. They are determined to strengthen the school and ensure the education which each pupil receives is as good as it can be. School leaders are supporting staff well and are working hard to develop a more consistent approach to teaching, including planning, and the marking of pupils’ work.

p.2

Main findings

School leaders and governors have worked well together to set rigorous performance targets for teachers and leaders. There are specific checks in place to determine whether the staff are on course to achieve the personal and school targets which have been set. Governors are clear about the school’s priorities for improvement and where standards must improve. There is a good understanding of their responsibilities and of the need to make secure and rapid progress. Their monitoring activities are closely aligned to points for improvement raised at the last inspection. Governors have been involved in school improvement planning, which is manageable and details how governors will check on the school’s progress. The school recognises that documentation does not specifically identify the work it has begun and is still to do to develop the links with pupils’ parents and carers, including the role of the newly appointed family liaison ambassador. There are inconsistencies

p.2

Main findings

in the presentation of pupils’ work, in the quality of their writing, and in teachers’ marking.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders and governors have begun to take effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommends that further action is taken to:

p.2

Main findings

 develop high quality marking in mathematics, giving clear instructions and allowing pupils more time to respond to teachers’ comments, checking their learning is secure before moving on  ensure there is greater consistency in expectations for pupils’ presentation of work, particularly in mathematics books, and ensure that pupils undertake sufficient independent work during each lesson  check that expectations for the quality of pupils’ writing established in literacy lessons are maintained when pupils are writing in other subject lessons  update the school improvement plan to include strategies designed to strengthen links with parents and carers in all of the aspects of its work  schedule another visit to the school by HMI to monitor progress

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The school is drawing effectively on a range of external support. Staff are working well with improvement resources provided through the Diocese. This is helping those with special responsibilities lead aspects of the schools work strongly and confidently. The local authority has provided useful support in reviewing school improvement documentation and action plans. The school has brokered their own external consultants and teachers with advanced skills who have begun to have a positive impact on teaching and learning across the school.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Diocese and the Director of Children’s Services for Warwickshire.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion