Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 15 Jan 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Philip Mann

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Philip Mann

  • Postcode verified

    CM23 3NH

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+61Positivemore positive than 59% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisewell-designedcleareffectivelyeffectiveclearlyimprovingsecure
Criticismyet to

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
536
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 37, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mrs K Perez Headteacher Thorley Hill Primary School Park Lane Bishop's Stortford CM23 3NH

p.1

Education act 2005 to Thorley Hill Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 18 December 2012, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Education act 2005 to Thorley Hill Primary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in October 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with the headteacher, other senior leaders, members of the Governing Body and a representative of the local authority. The school improvement plan was evaluated alongside a range of other self-evaluation and monitoring documents.

p.1

Context

There have been no changes to the staffing since the previous inspection. There are currently three vacancies on the governing body.

p.1

Main findings

A well-designed action plan provides a clear structure for school improvement. Actions have been prioritised effectively to address all the areas for improvement identified at the last inspection. Responsibilities are clearly identified within specific timescales to facilitate rapid improvement. However, these actions are yet to be fully reflected in classroom practice throughout the school to ensure that all pupils Serco Inspections Cedar House 21 William Street Edgbaston Birmingham B15 1LH T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0121 683 3291 Direct email :tim.ogbourn@serco.com achieve well and especially in their writing. Although appropriate targets are set within the action plan they are not high enough to ensure all pupils make good or better progress in English and mathematics.

p.1

Main findings

Discussions with school leaders and those with specific responsibility for leading the teaching of English and mathematics confirm that there is a sharper focus on improving the quality of teaching and the achievement of pupils in all classes. All staff with a leadership responsibility undertake observations of lessons and play a greater role in monitoring pupil progress and teacher performance.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The Governing Body has implemented clear strategies to monitor the progress of the action plan and its impact on pupil progress. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommend that further action is taken to:

p.2

Main findings

 ensure that targets within the action plan are sufficiently challenging to raise standards further in English and mathematics  that HMI undertake a further monitoring visit alongside school leaders to review the quality of teaching and learning across Key Stage 2.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The local authority provides appropriate levels of support and guidance to staff and governors including specific training for teachers. Local authority improvement officers maintain a close overview of the school to ensure that it quickly tackles the key issues from the inspection to secure the necessary improvements in pupils’ outcomes.

p.2

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Hertfordshire.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion