Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Jean Kendall
- Postcode verified
BB5 4HG
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 684
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 42, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs Jacqueline Williams Sacred Heart Roman Catholic Primary School, Bradshaw Row, Church, Accrington, Lancashire BB5 4HG
p.1
Education act 2005 to Sacred Heart Roman Catholic Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 12 December 2012, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Education act 2005 to Sacred Heart Roman Catholic Primary School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in October 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with the headteacher and senior leaders, the Chair and Vice-Chair of the governing body, representatives of the local authority and a group of pupils. The HMI was taken on a tour of the school and met briefly with all teachers and teaching assistants. The school improvement plans and records of the school’s monitoring were evaluated.
p.1
Context
There have been no changes to staffing or the school’s organisation since the inspection.
p.1
Main findings
With support from the local authority, school leaders have written a detailed action plan that addresses all the areas identified as requiring improvement in the recent CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566862 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email :rcowley@cfbt.com inspection. The plan includes precise timescales and appropriate success criteria. There are clear milestones by which the impact of actions can be measured relating to pupils’ progress and the quality of teaching. It would be helpful to add further measures to compare attainment at Sacred Heart and attainment nationally, and monitor whether the gap is closing. The plan is comprehensive and suitably supported by action plans to improve literacy and numeracy. However it does not always make clear the role that governors will have in monitoring and evaluating
p.1
Main findings
progress with actions and the impact they having.
p.2
Main findings
Since the inspection, the school has taken appropriate action to improve the quality of teaching and learning. The marking policy and expectations for the presentation of pupils’ written work have been revised and agreed with all staff. Professional development has focused on promoting independent learning and organising guided reading. The headteacher has taken appropriate action to develop the skills of subject leaders through coaching in lesson observation and scrutiny of planning and pupils’ work. Lesson observation records provide clear points for feedback but do not always refer to pupils’ progress.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders and governors have begun to take effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommends that further action is taken to:
p.2
Main findings
ensure all staff are held accountable for the implementation of revised whole school policies and the progress of the pupils they teach develop a brief action plan for governors outlining monitoring activities and how they will evaluate the impact of actions.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The local authority and Diocese have provided considerable support to the school. This has been effective in helping to strengthen governance and leadership. The local authority has provided a range of consultant and adviser support which is valued by teachers and is supporting improvements in teaching. Further external support is planned through establishing links with a National Leader of Education.
p.2
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Lancashire and as below.
p.2
Her Majesty’s Inspector
The letter should be copied to the following:
p.3
Her Majesty’s Inspector
Appropriate authority - Chair of the Governing Body/Interim Executive Board Local authority the academy chain where relevant Diocese – for voluntary aided and voluntary controlled schools The Education Funding Agency (EFA) if the school has a sixth form The person or body responsible for appointing foundation governors if the school has a foundation The lead inspector.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion