Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Jean Kendall
- Postcode verified
LA8 8PU
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 690
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr M Foxwell Levens CofE Primary School Church Road Levens, Kendal Cumbria LA8 8PU
p.1
Education act 2005 to Levens CofE Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 11 December, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Education act 2005 to Levens CofE Primary School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in October 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with the headteacher and senior teacher, representatives of the governing body, a representative of the local authority and a group of pupils. A range of documentation, including the school improvement plan was evaluated. Performance management and NQT induction plans were discussed.
p.1
Context
Since the recent inspection, one new teaching assistant has been appointed. There have been no other significant changes to the school.
p.1
Main findings
School leaders have drawn up an action plan that is well organised and addresses fully all the areas for improvement identified at the inspection. The plan specifies appropriate actions together with a realistic timescale for review. However, some success criteria could be more precisely quantified so that review can be sharper. CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566932 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email :hcarnall@cfbt.com Monitoring the progress against the plan relies heavily on the headteacher’s reports to the governing body. Governors accept the need to develop their monitoring role further. They are taking the initiative to build their expertise in order to challenge and support school leaders more effectively. They have developed links between individual governors and members of staff and have arranged training in analysing
p.1
Main findings
the school’s data on pupils’ attainment and progress. The curriculum committee has been strengthened with a new chair to this committee.
p.2
Main findings
Since the October inspection, the school has rearranged phonics teaching to ensure that all pupils have access to the support they need. Pupils recognise a greater emphasis being placed on the presentation of their work and think that their writing has improved as a result. All staff have participated in training on the use of assessment information to plan more challenging activities.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders and governors have begun to take effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommends that further action is taken to:
p.2
Main findings
refine the action plan to include specific measurable success criteria and identify how progress towards them will be monitored develop a brief action plan for governors identifying their role in monitoring pupils’ progress and progress against the action plan.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The local authority has provided considerable support to the school during the last year and continues to do so. Local authority officers have advised on the action plan and led professional development for staff, which is helping to improve the quality of teaching. They have been instrumental in facilitating links with other local schools and a Local Leader of Education so that leaders and teachers can see successful practice elsewhere. They recognise the need to tailor future professional development to enable staff, particularly the newly qualified teachers, to work with colleagues in other schools.
p.2
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Cumbria and as below.
p.2
Her Majesty’s Inspector
The letter should be copied to the following: Appropriate authority - Chair of the Governing Body/Interim Executive Board Local authority the academy chain where relevant Diocese – for voluntary aided and voluntary controlled schools The Education Funding Agency (EFA) if the school has a sixth form The person or body responsible for appointing foundation governors if the school has a foundation The lead inspector.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion