Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 14 Jan 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Clive Moss

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Clive Moss

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+56Positivemore positive than 55% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveenthusiasmpositivekeenclearly
Criticismbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
608
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566932 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: hcarnall@cfbt.com

p.1

Mrs Philippa Boulding Headteacher Aberford Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School School Lane Aberford Leeds West Yorkshire LS25 3BU

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 11 December 2012, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in October 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with the headteacher, other senior leaders, the Governing Body, and a representative of the local authority. The school improvement and action plans were evaluated and other documents provided by the school were scrutinised. Also, I undertook a tour of the school with the headteacher, visiting classrooms briefly.

p.1

Context

There have been no major changes to the context of the school since the section 5 inspection.

p.1

Main findings

Senior leaders and the governing body are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school has focussed unequivocally on the areas requiring improvement. It is evident that priorities are now clearer and there is a greater degree of impetus for improvement and rigour in the activities to bring it about. The headteacher, senior leaders and the governing body have taken a coherent and collective approach and each demonstrates drive, determination and ambition. Necessary actions are being taken to bring about improvements in the quality of teaching. Senior leaders show enthusiasm for their responsibilities and are keen to implement the planned activities and increasingly taking the initiative. The schools plans and documentation highlight the degree to which it has focused on the inspection outcomes.

p.2

Main findings

Following the visit to the school, HMI recommended that further action is taken to:  incorporate quantitative targets into the school’s Learning Improvement Plan, particularly for pupils’ achievement  identify more clearly the ways in which progress with the Learning Improvement Plan will be evaluated, rather than just monitored  attend one of the Ofsted ‘Getting to good’ seminars, as soon as these are available.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection. It is recommended that HMI maintains contact with the school, with a view to visiting it again before the next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

There is an appropriate range of external support available to the school from the local authority and a partner school. The school is using the available external support well. The external support has, for example, already had a positive impact on the confidence and skills of senior leaders to carry out their roles and it recommended that the full package of support for the senior leaders is provided as planned.

p.2

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children's Services for Leeds and as below.

p.2

Her Majesty's Inspector

The letter should be copied to the following:

p.2

Her Majesty's Inspector

● Appropriate authority - Chair of the Governing Body/Interim Executive Board ● Local authority ● the academy chain where relevant ● Diocese - for voluntary aided and voluntary controlled schools ● The Education Funding Agency (EFA) if the school has a sixth form ● The person or body responsible for appointing foundation governors if the school has a foundation ● The lead inspector.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion