Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Rowley Hall Primary School
Summary
David Shears (lead), Kate Robertson, Shahnaz Maqsood
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
14 Dec 2012
- Inspectors verified
David Shears, Kate Robertson, Shahnaz Maqsood
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Satisfactory
- Postcode verified
B65 9HU
- Name on report verified
Rowley Hall Primary School
- URN verified
103955
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2006.
- OverallGood
- Leadership and managementGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.7
- At Key Stage 2 the pace of learning accelerates again and pupils make consistently good progress in all year groups. p.4
- Pupils behave well, enjoy learning and feel safe. p.1
- A clear and effective focus on improving writing skills has led to pupils making better progress in English. p.1
- This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. p.7
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. p.7
- Leaders track the progress made by all pupils carefully, so that any at risk of falling behind in their work are quickly spotted and given extra help and guidance to make up lost ground. p.5
- In the small number of lessons where teaching is less effective, mostly in Key Stage 1, there are some common weaknesses. p.5
- The new subject leaders have not yet developed their skills in checking teaching and learning, and lesson observations do not always focus enough on pupils’ progress. p.1
- Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. p.7
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 2,063
- shorter than usual (typical 2966)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Rowley Hall Primary School Windsor Road, Rowley Regis, B65 9HU
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a good school. Pupils make good progress and achieve well in English and mathematics. This is because teaching is typically good, and ensures that work is suitable for each pupil. The school carefully tracks the progress made by all groups of pupils and gives extra support to those who need it. Good relationships result in a positive atmosphere that permeates the school. Pupils behave well, enjoy learning and feel safe. Attendance has improved from broadly average in the last inspection to above average now. The quality of care is a strength of the school, particularly in supporting pupils who need the most help and guidance. Good leadership and management are supporting rising standards. A clear and effective focus on improving writing skills has led to pupils making better progress in English.
p.1
It is not yet an outstanding school because
The detailed information gathered on children’s progress in Reception is not used well enough in planning lessons for Year 1 pupils. In a small number of lessons, particularly in Years 1 and 2, teachers do not check enough to make sure pupils are making good progress, or give them enough time to practise their newly learnt skills. The school improvement plan has too many areas for improvement to be fully effective. The new subject leaders have not yet developed their skills in checking teaching and learning, and lesson observations do not always focus enough on pupils’ progress.
p.1
Information about this inspection
Inspectors visited 24 lessons taught by 17 different teachers, and held meetings with governors, staff, groups of pupils and a representative of the local authority. They observed the school’s work and looked at planning documents, monitoring records, assessment data and pupils’ work. There were 21 responses to Parent View (the online questionnaire) during the inspection. These results were taken into account by inspectors in reaching judgements about the school.
p.2
Inspection team
David Shears, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Shahnaz Maqsood Additional Inspector Kate Robertson Additional Inspector
p.2
Information about this school
Rowley Hall Primary is larger than the average-sized primary school. The proportions of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs supported through school action, and at school action plus or through a statement of special educational needs, are above average. The proportions of pupils from minority ethnic groups and those who speak English as an additional language are both below national averages. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for the pupil premium is above the national average. The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress. Breakfast and after-school clubs are provided for pupils by the school. A new headteacher has been appointed from January 2013.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Make teaching consistently good or better, particularly in Key Stage 1, by making sure that: teachers make better use of checks carried out on pupils from the Early Years Foundation Stage so that pupils in Year 1 make good progress throughout the year lesson planning takes full account of the different abilities of all groups of pupils teachers check during lessons the progress of all pupils and give further support or challenge as needed pupils have enough time in lessons to practise the new skills they have learnt.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Strengthen the effectiveness of leadership and management by: focusing school development planning sharply on the main priorities for improving the school focusing lesson observations on the quality of learning for different groups of pupils giving subject leaders more training and opportunities to develop their skills in checking the quality of teaching and learning in their subject areas.
p.3
The achievement of pupils is good
Children begin school with skills and knowledge that are well below age-related expectations. Positive relationships are built with parents and carers and this helps children to settle quickly into the Nursery. Children make good progress in all areas of learning in both the Nursery and the Reception classes.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
Children are encouraged to think independently while still having opportunities for teacher-led learning. For example, in one lesson children were trying to guess what might be in a present and practising using their early phonics (the sounds that letters make) skills to write labels.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
In Key Stage 1 progress is not as consistently rapid. This is because teachers do not always use what they know about pupils’ previous achievements to plan work at exactly the right level for all groups of pupils. For example, in one mathematics lesson about estimating the activities set were appropriately demanding for most pupils, but did not stretch the more-able pupils.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
At Key Stage 2 the pace of learning accelerates again and pupils make consistently good progress in all year groups. Pupils of all abilities are challenged well. In one lesson seen, all pupils had demanding individual targets to help them improve their writing skills. All pupils were able to learn independently and good interventions by the teacher and the teaching assistant kept them on track and on their toes. In Year 6, attainment is broadly average and rising.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
The progress of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs is good overall. They receive good support and guidance in the Early Years Foundation Stage and in Key Stage 2. For example, in one lesson these pupils were given good support in learning how to use speech marks in their writing. However, they mostly make slower progress in Key Stage 1 in line with other pupils. Pupils from ethnic minority groups make similar progress.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
Pupils with complex needs that require specific support make good progress throughout the school because their needs are met well. Pupils who speak English as an additional language and those supported by pupil premium funding also make good progress in all year groups. These pupils benefit from a range of help and guidance, including one-to-one support from adults. As a result they have made accelerated progress so their attainment gets closer to that of other groups.
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
The quality of teaching in the large majority of classes is good and there are positive elements in all lessons. Good relationships between staff and pupils result in pupils who are keen to learn.
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
Pupils are told what they are going to be learning in lessons, and all teachers plan interesting practical activities to engage them. For example, they make good use is made of interactive whiteboards to make lessons exciting and maintain pupils’ attention.
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
Teachers use their good subject knowledge extensively to challenge the thinking skills of all pupils through clearly focused questions. Lessons build effectively on pupils’ previous learning.
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
Disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs, particularly those who have the greatest needs, often make good progress. This is because the school makes good use of its close links with external specialists such as therapists to help staff in providing individual support.
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
Pupils know their targets, and teachers often refer to them in lessons. Many pupils are able to accurately judge for themselves whether they have understood the work. Marking and feedback in English and mathematics often tell pupils what they need to do to improve their work, although this is not yet consistent in every class.
p.5
The quality of teaching is good
In the small number of lessons where teaching is less effective, mostly in Key Stage 1, there are some common weaknesses. Sometimes the teachers’ instructions go on for too long, so pupils do not have enough time to practise what they have been learning. During activities teachers do not always check to make sure that all pupils are making good progress. Consequently some pupils occasionally struggle with the work or finish early with nothing else to do, limiting the progress they make.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Pupils behave well in lessons because they are eager to learn. They behave well in the playground and noticeably get on well together. Pupils say behaviour in the school is good, and all staff and the majority of parents and carers agree.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Pupils talk enthusiastically about the school. One said ‘we have fun learning’ and another that school ‘is amazing’. They develop good working relationships with each other and support each other well in their learning. They are equally able to learn independently. Pupils usually behave well even when teaching is not as strong, although there are occasions when younger pupils lose their concentration when work does not meet their needs.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Pupils have a good understanding of what constitutes bullying. They say that this only happens occasionally, and are clear in stating that any incidents are fully explored and addressed and so all pupils feel safe. They say how well they are cared for by staff throughout the whole day, whether in school or out on the playground.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
The school has put much work into promoting attendance. As a result this has improved considerably over the last year, and is now higher than the national average. Pupils are given good incentives to encourage them to attend regularly, and both pupils and parents receive regular information about attendance rates and the target attendance that the school is intending to reach.
p.5
The leadership and management are good
The senior leaders have a good understanding of the school’s strengths and what it needs to do to improve. The areas for development are included in the school improvement plan, although there are too many for it do be fully effective as a sharp tool for driving improvement.
p.5
The leadership and management are good
Leaders have had a good impact on the quality of learning in particular areas. For example, they recognised that the quality of writing was a cause for concern. As a result of a focus across the school on improving the teaching of writing, the progress that pupils made in developing their writing skills has significantly improved last year.
p.5
The leadership and management are good
Leaders track the progress made by all pupils carefully, so that any at risk of falling behind in their work are quickly spotted and given extra help and guidance to make up lost ground. They also check the quality of teaching regularly to identify strengths and areas for further development, although these checks sometimes focus too much on what teachers are doing rather than the impact of their actions on pupils’ learning.
p.5
The leadership and management are good
The results of the checks on pupils’ ongoing progress and the quality of teaching give the school a clear picture of the effectiveness of each teacher. Along with individual targets for performance, they are used appropriately when considering staff promotion and pay rises.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
The school cares for pupils particularly well. All feel welcomed and accepted, and know that they can ask for support and guidance when needed. This good care is also evident in the breakfast and after-school clubs. The school promotes pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development well in the way subjects are taught, and through a wide variety of clubs and activities.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
The school, including the governing body, fosters good relationships with parents and carers, giving them helpful support such as the successful ‘inspire’ workshops where they have an opportunity to work alongside their children. Most parents and carers are pleased with the school and would recommend it to others.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
There are a number of new subject leaders. The school has made sure that the previous leaders are giving good support to enable them to learn their role. However, this is still in its early stages and the new leaders recognise the need to develop their skills in checking the quality of learning in the subjects they are responsible for.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
The local authority provides a good level of support and challenge to the school, by giving an independent view on the school’s self-evaluation and checking its analysis of standards.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
The governance of the school: The governing body has a clear understanding of the school’s strengths and weaknesses, and how well the school is performing compared to other similar schools. It provides good support and as well as asking challenging questions. Governors are involved in their own monitoring although this is not always linked carefully enough to the school’s main areas of development, limiting its effectiveness. Their monitoring of the school budget is strong. In particular, governors are very clear about how the extra money to support particular pupils such as those eligible for the pupil premium is used, and the impact that this has had on their learning. They have received effective training about checking how teachers’ pay relates to their performance and the quality of teaching. The governing body ensures that safeguarding policies and procedures meet current national requirements. While the governing body has many
p.6
The leadership and management are good
strengths, it does not have its own improvement plan.
p.6
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.7
School details
Unique reference number 103955 Local authority Sandwell Inspection number 400675
p.8
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Type of school Primary School category Foundation Age range of pupils 3–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 499 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Ann Doman Headteacher Lynda Townsend Date of previous school inspection 18 March 2010 Telephone number 0121 559 1400 Fax number 0121 559 8030 Email address headteacher@rowleyhall.sandwell.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.9
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.9
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.9
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion