Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Dorothy Bathgate
- Postcode verified
DE55 2JB
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 489
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
PROTECT-INSPECTION
Jan Seymour Headteacher Glebe Junior School Hamlet Lane South Normanton Alfreton DE55 2JB
p.1
Education act 2005 to Glebe Junior School
Following my visit to your school on 17 December 2012, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Education act 2005 to Glebe Junior School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in October 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with the headteacher, representatives of the governing body and the link adviser from the local authority. The school improvement plans were evaluated.
p.1
Context
There have been no significant contextual changes since the recent inspection which judged the school to require improvement.
p.1
Main findings
The school improvement plan has been suitably revised and a short term action plan devised. There is a strong emphasis on addressing the areas for improvement Serco Inspections Cedar House 21 William Street Edgbaston Birmingham B15 1LH T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0121 683 3263 Direct email :lewis.mackie1@serco.com
p.1
PROTECT-INSPECTION
identified in the recent inspection. Senior leaders have taken immediate action to strengthen lesson planning where required, develop opportunities for staff to share good practice, implement a whole-school approach to writing, and develop the roles of senior and middle leaders. All teachers have been observed since the recent inspection. Where lessons have required improvement, clear areas for development have been agreed and followed up promptly by senior leaders.
p.2
PROTECT-INSPECTION
The governing body meets regularly to discuss the progress of pupils and the actions that need to be taken in order for the school to become good. They are increasingly involved in evaluating the work of the school.
p.2
PROTECT-INSPECTION
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommends visiting the school again for two consecutive days to carry out a range of monitoring activities, including lesson observations.
p.2
PROTECT-INSPECTION
Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The local authority is providing good support to the school. Since the inspection, this support and guidance has been well tailored to meet the school’s most urgent needs. The link adviser has coordinated a range of support, including the support of a local authority consultant to work with the Year 3 leader, as well as the literacy and numeracy leaders. The link adviser is holding regular review meetings to challenge school leaders and to check that actions being taken are having the desired effect.
p.2
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Derbyshire and as below.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion