Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Adrian Lyons
- Postcode verified
RM12 4QS
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 613
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 21%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Ian Trafford Headteacher Benhurst Primary School Benhurst Avenue Elm Park Hornchurch Essex RM12 4QS
p.1
Education act 2005 to Benhurst Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 18 December 2012, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Education act 2005 to Benhurst Primary School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in October 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with the headteacher and other senior leaders, the Chair of the Governing Body and representatives of the local authority. The school’s action plan was evaluated.
p.1
Context
There have been no significant changes since the last inspection.
p.1
Main findings
The school’s action plan is rightly focused on improving the quality of teaching. It has clear success criteria and milestones, although some timescales lack urgency. Senior leaders were able to report positive progress already in some areas. Some whole staff training to improve teaching and learning has taken place. During a Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5319 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Direct email : matthew.parker@ tribalgroup.com period of focused monitoring, the school has identified improvements in marking. Senior leaders have received additional training in lesson observation leading to a better understanding of how to assess teaching. Teachers are planning together and arrangements exist to share best practice through observation of one another and teaching some lessons together. The school has identified the need to improve the
p.1
Main findings
achievement of some White British boys and the quality of teaching in classes containing pupils from more than one year group. It has not yet drawn on the expertise of other schools to promote improvement in these areas.
p.2
Main findings
Governors, while highly supportive, are not yet fully involved in evaluating the work of the school and it is not clear how they propose to develop their effectiveness. The governing body has no separate action plan, its impact has not been reviewed, and monitoring by governors is not written into the school’s development plans.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders and governors have begun to take effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommend that further action is taken to:
p.2
Main findings
increase the sense of urgency regarding timescales in the action plan arrange an external review of governance in order to assess how this aspect of leadership may be improved, (the school should contact the National College via governance.review@nationalcollege.gsi.gov.uk to request a review of governance) locate and learn from primary schools with expertise in managing mixed-aged classes and/or promoting the achievement of White British boys in co-operation with the local authority, seek additional partnership arrangements in order to benefit from fresh approaches to raising achievement.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
Prior to the recent inspection the local authority had notified leaders that the school was to be included in its programme of support and challenge for schools likely to receive a ‘requires improvement’ judgement from Ofsted. The local authority has established a termly monitoring board to review the school’s progress regularly. Local authority staff visit the school to provide staff training to improve teaching.
p.2
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Havering.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion