Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Stephen Long
- Postcode verified
RH3 7LA
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 640
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 23 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs Angela Ewing Headteacher North Downs Primary School Wheelers Lane Betchworth Surrey RH3 7LA
p.1
Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 12 December 2012 I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the outcome and inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Primary School
This monitoring inspection visit was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During this inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher, a group of governors including the Chair of the Governing Body, the school improvement advisor from the local authority commissioned school improvement partner, subject leaders for mathematics and English and a group of pupils. Brief visits were made to classrooms, and the school’s improvement plan was evaluated.
p.1
Context
There have been no significant changes in the school since the previous inspection.
p.1
Main findings
The headteacher and senior leaders are tackling the areas requiring improvement with conviction. The school development plan centres firmly on raising pupils’ attainment in writing and mathematics, and on improving teaching, as it did at the time of the section 5 inspection. While overall goals are clear, the actions intended Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 3115319 Direct F 0117 3150430 Direct email :matthew.parker@tribalgroup.com to improve teaching and the work of subject leaders are not all detailed enough to ensure they are understood by everyone, and that the impact on pupils can be checked. It is also unclear how pupils’ progress over time will be better monitored, including by governors, to ensure they reach challenging targets by Year 6.
p.1
Main findings
Staff development is well focused on enhancing teaching, based on regular monitoring led by the headteacher. There is a growing realisation among staff that teaching can only be judged as good when pupils make good progress over time. Teachers are becoming more aware of the need to ensure pupils’ work builds on what they already know, and challenges all pupils with well-paced activities. Much effort is rightly going into ensuring pupils’ progress is tracked accurately to identify those needing extra support. Teachers are starting to provide better opportunities for writing and to engage pupils in setting their own targets. Support from external consultants and the senior team is boosting subject leaders’ skills in monitoring and leading their areas. Governors are sharpening their focus on achievement. Useful training for them on data analysis is underway from school staff and local authority personnel, and is helping them ask more probing questions about pupils’ progress.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommend that further steps are taken to sharpen the development plan so it shows:
p.2
Main findings
more detail about the actions to improve teaching and the impact of subject leaders, how these will benefit pupils and how this will be checked how staff and governors will check the progress of different year groups toward long term goals so these are hit and teachers are held to account for their impact.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The headteacher and school improvement advisor have coordinated a range of useful support for the school. This includes work with English and mathematics consultants and is helping raise the quality of teaching, as well as the school’s capacity to improve itself. There are suitable plans for further input, including for governors, and for monitoring the impact of what is provided.
p.2
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Surrey and as below.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion