Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by St Cuthbert’s Care in Newcastle upon Tyne
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
27 Nov 2012
- Inspectors verified
Dennis Bradley
- URN verified
SC033467
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- review the home's written restraint records to ensure they comply fully with national minimum standards (NMS 3.16 and 3.17) p.4
- ensure that the results of all statutory reviews are retained on the young person's file (NMS 25.8) p.4
- ensure that, during every visit, the person carrying out the visits under Regulation 33 speaks in private with the parents or relatives of young people living at the home. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Wellbeing & mental health2
“It is registered to care for young people with emotional and behavioural difficulties.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 902
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 42, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC033467 Inspection date 27/11/2012 Inspector Dennis Bradley Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 13/08/2012 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Brief description of the service
The children's home is provided by a charitable organisation and cares for up to eight young people aged 10 to 17 years old. It is registered to care for young people with emotional and behavioural difficulties.
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making satisfactory progress .
p.3
Progress
The home was judged to be good at the last full inspection. Since then young people continue to make good progress from their starting points when they first moved into the home. For example, they are all successfully attending education or training placements, which will help them to reach their potential and achieve economic well- being. A young person said that staff help them understand what they want to achieve in the future. The young people also benefit from participating in a wide range of activities including voluntary work within the local community. This enables them to pursue their individual interests and helps them gain confidence in their abilities and builds their self-esteem. Young people are also learning and developing their independence skills to help them make a smooth transition to adulthood.
p.3
Progress
Young people have good opportunities to participate in decisions about their day-to- day lives and future. For example, young people are actively involved in reviewing the care and support they receive. There are also regular group meetings where they are encouraged and supported to have their say about how the home is run and to identify any improvements that could be made. Young people know they are listened to and this helps them feel valued and included. Young people have positive relationships with staff and generally get on well together. Group living helps them develop their social skills. Evening meals are taken together and are social occasions where staff and young people have the opportunity to talk about day-to-day events, and spend quality time with each other.
p.3
Progress
The manager has been in post for less than a month but they have already made changes to improve the service. For example, team meetings now include time for staff to focus on specific aspects of the national minimum standards. This helps staff develop a better understanding of the standards and how to promote good outcomes for young people.
p.4
Progress
Four recommendations were made at the last inspection. However, only one of these has been addressed satisfactorily. Staff now record the whereabouts of young people that return from being missing in the missing person log. This helps staff determine whether the young person is running away to a specific location or to specific people, and what action can be taken to prevent them going missing again. The frequency young people go missing has significantly reduced since the last inspection.
p.4
Progress
Action has been taken to try to address the other three recommendations, but this has not been satisfactory. Records of incidents where staff have used physical restraint on young people still do not always contain the all required information. For example, they do not always say whether the young person concerned was given the opportunity to be examined by a registered nurse or medical practitioner. Not recording such essential information makes it more difficult for the registered person to effectively monitor such incidents to ensure appropriate action has been taken. The provider has an external quality monitoring programme that involves monthly visits to the home. However, these visits do not always include consultation with parents or relatives of the young people living at the home. This means that parents and relatives are not regularly involved in contributing to monitoring the operation of
p.4
Progress
the home. A recommendation relating to the records of statutory reviews of young people living at the home has also not been addressed. Not all of the records of reviews are available in the home. This means, for example, that the individuals who are specifically accountable for carrying out tasks agreed at the review are not always clearly identified.
p.4
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):
p.4
Recommendations
review the home's written restraint records to ensure they comply fully with national minimum standards (NMS 3.16 and 3.17) ensure that the results of all statutory reviews are retained on the young person's file (NMS 25.8) ensure that, during every visit, the person carrying out the visits under Regulation 33 speaks in private with the parents or relatives of young people living at the home. (NMS 21.7)
p.4
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.6
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion