Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 28 Dec 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Marianne Young

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Marianne Young

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+67Positivemore positive than 65% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseclearlyimprovingimprovedeffectiveclear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
678
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566932 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: hcarnall@cfbt.com

p.1

Ms Evelyn Abram Headteacher Sharrow Nursery, Infant and Junior School Sitwell Road Sheffield South Yorkshire S7 1BE

p.1

Education act 2005 to Sharrow Nursery, Infant and Junior School

Following my visit to your school on 7 December 2012, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Education act 2005 to Sharrow Nursery, Infant and Junior School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in October 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with the headteacher, deputy headteachers, three members of the governing body and a representative from the local authority. The school improvement plan was evaluated and a range of other documentations were reviewed.

p.1

Context

Since the October inspection, five people have been appointed to the governing body. A member of staff has been appointed as Special Needs Coordinator.

p.1

Main findings

The new headteacher has written an action plan linked closely to the issues identified in the October inspection. It also includes an additional priority around the teaching of mathematics. This was identified as a result of senior leaders conducting whole school monitoring checks after the inspection. The plan states clearly how pupil progress will be measured and who is responsible for each priority area. There are some time-related milestones within the plan, but these timed checks are not happening frequently enough and some actions, for example how improvements in the quality of teaching will improve the progress for all groups of pupils, are rather vague.

p.2

Main findings

All teachers now have individual targets that relate directly to improving pupils’ progress. Senior leaders check teaching regularly, they look at pupils’ books and provide clear feedback to individual teachers. Open dialogue and discussion is being embedded throughout the school with staff meetings clearly focused on showing how the quality of teaching must be improved.

p.2

Main findings

Members of the governing body meet regularly to discuss pupils’ progress and to receive information from senior leaders. Governors ask detailed questions and are aware of the need to make improvements quickly. New governors are being encouraged to shadow a number of meetings so that they are familiar with the school and the quality of education provided.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders and governors have begun to take effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommend that further action is taken to:

p.2

Main findings

 improve the action plan to include more frequent numerical targets in order to check the impact of the actions already in place and their effect on the progress of all pupils

p.2

Main findings

 embed, reflect and consider the impact of the external support and internal initiatives taken this term and what are the next steps towards improvement.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The headteacher has quickly developed links with various education agencies to provide support, to strengthen leadership and to improve the quality of teaching. Staff from Sharrow School have visited other schools within the local authority and have enrolled on leadership courses. They welcome this work and how they are able to improve their practice as a result. The Chair of the Governing Body has made contact with the national college of governance with a view of improving the quality of governance within the school. It is too early to comment on the impact of this work. Local authority officers maintain a close eye on the school through regular meetings with leaders and to check that actions taken are having the desired effect. I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children's Services for Sheffield.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion