Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
The Mount Junior Infant & Nursery School
Summary
Peter Jones (lead), Susan Twaits
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
5 Dec 2012
- Inspectors verified
Peter Jones, Susan Twaits
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Satisfactory
- Postcode verified
WF2 8QW
- Name on report verified
Wakefield The Mount Junior and Infant School
- URN verified
108215
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2010.
- OverallGood
- Leadership and managementGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.7
- They say it is dealt with promptly and effectively and that they feel safe in p.5
- The growing numbers of pupils with English as an additional language often make rapid progress. p.1
- Whilst the standards these pupils reach may not be as high as those attained by their classmates, they often make good, and sometimes outstanding, progress over a short time. p.4
- The majority of pupils are cooperative and eager to learn and are proud of their school. p.5
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. p.7
- Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. p.7
- Teachers do not always share effective ways of working. p.1
- Teaching is not outstanding because lesson introductions are sometime too long, there are aspects of the teaching of writing that require some improvement and a lack of sharing the most effective methods of teaching between all staff. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 2,398
- about usual (typical 2966)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 17%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Wakefield The Mount Junior and Infant School The Mount, off Thornes Road, Wakefield , West Yorkshire, WF2 8QW
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a good school. Pupils make good progress from their starting points in the Reception class and by the time they leave Year 6 they reach average standards of attainment. The school’s leadership checks the work of the school very carefully and then takes effective action. As a result, achievement and teaching are continually improving. The overall quality of teaching is good. Pupils enjoy the lively and exciting lessons provided by the majority of teachers. The school has responded well to the challenges raised by pupils leaving and joining the school at different times. Those pupils known to be eligible for pupil premium funding and those with disabilities and special educational needs make good progress. The growing numbers of pupils with English as an additional language often make rapid progress. Pupils usually behave well in lessons and try to do their best. Pupils say they feel safe.
p.1
It is not yet an outstanding school because
Pupils’ standards in writing are not as high as those in reading and mathematics, and the quality of pupils' presentation of their work is too variable. In a few lessons, introductions are too long restricting pupils’ opportunities to practise their skills, especially in writing. Pupils' work is regularly marked but pupils do not always respond to the comments that teachers write in their books. Teachers do not always share effective ways of working. For example, although some teachers make sure that the work set is at the correct level for pupils, this is not always the case. The sanctions used to improve behaviour include writing activities that can give pupils a negative view of writing.
p.1
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed teaching in every class, visiting 12 lessons. They listened to pupils in Year 2 and Year 6 read. They held discussions with pupils and staff, met two governors and the school improvement adviser employed by the local authority. In addition, the inspection team evaluated the quality of pupils’ work in their books and folders. Inspectors took account of 11 responses to the online questionnaire (Parent View) in planning the inspection and forming judgements. The inspection team looked at a range of school documentation. This included those related to safeguarding, the plans for the school’s improvement, records related to pupils’ behaviour, attendance, attainment and progress and the school’s self-evaluation of the quality of its work.
p.2
Inspection team
Peter Jones, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Susan Twaits Additional Inspector
p.2
Information about this school
This is a smaller than average size primary school. It includes an Early Years Foundation Stage unit comprising one Reception class. A large proportion of pupils are of White British heritage. Around a tenth of pupils are from a range of minority ethnic backgrounds. The proportion of pupils for whom English is an additional language is lower than the national average. A very high percentage of pupils are known to be eligible for the pupil premium funding, which supports those pupils known to be eligible for entitled to free school meals, in the care of the local authority or from service families. The proportion of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs, including those supported at school action is average. The proportion of pupils at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is also average. The number of pupils joining and leaving the school throughout the school year is higher than
p.3
Information about this school
average. Of these pupils, many join from other countries and some have limited previous experience of education. There is an after-school club that is not managed by the school’s governing body. The school meets the government’s current floor standards which set minimum expectations for pupils’ progress and attainment.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Raise standards further, particularly in writing, by: - improving pupils’ spelling, particularly for those pupils in Years 1 and 2 - giving pupils ample opportunities to produce longer pieces of writing - expecting pupils to increase the amount of work they do in lessons and making certain that they take more care about the way that work is presented - making sure that sanctions to deal with unacceptable behaviour do not give pupils a negative view of writing.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of teaching so that it is consistently good or outstanding by: - making sure that good practice is shared by all staff especially the checking that work is always set at exactly the right level for each pupil - making sure that introductions to lessons are not too long and allow pupils more time to practise their skills - making certain that pupils’ work is always marked in a way that they can understand and providing opportunities for pupils to respond to written comments.
p.3
The achievement of pupils is good
Pupils’ achievement has improved in recent years and is now good. Most pupils have very positive attitudes to their learning and are keen to do well. They enjoy the many stimulating and exciting lessons the school offers. Children’s skills are often below expectations when they join the Reception class. They are particularly low for many in language, personal and social and emotional development and some important aspects of number. All children make a brisk start thanks to the effective teaching they receive. They make good progress overall, particularly in speaking and listening and personal development. Progress is good in language and number given the children’s starting points, but for many their skills remain below expectations when they begin Year 1. Overall results in the letters and sounds test taken by pupils in Year 1 in 2012 were lower than the national average. The school launched a new school-wide programme in September this year
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
that has already made a dramatic difference to pupils’ understanding of the sounds that letters make. Progress in Key Stage 1 is good. At the end of Year 2, attainment is rising and many pupils now reach average standards in reading and mathematics. Results of national tests compared well with those reached by similar pupils across the country. Some of those pupils with lower language and number skills do not reach expected levels but their progress is good from their starting points. Good progress is maintained in Key Stage 2 and by the time pupils leave Year 6 their attainment is securely in line with national expectations. Results of national tests in 2012 show an overall improvement in attainment and progress. This is partly the result of new systems to check on the progress of pupils. Pupils now have targets that are realistic but high enough to increase their progress. Inspectors looked at the work and progress of pupils currently in school
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
and this showed that they are on target to improve on last year’s achievement. Although achievement in writing is good, attainment is not as high as in other subjects. The school has recently introduced new teaching approaches to tackle this area but it is too early to judge if they are making a difference. In Years 1 and 2, pupils are insecure in their spelling and across the school pupils do not always complete enough writing that shows sufficient care over presentation and handwriting. Many pupils join and leave the school at different times in the year and need additional support in their learning. A growing number arrive with little or no English or experience of formal education. Whilst the standards these pupils reach may not be as high as those attained by their classmates, they often make good, and sometimes outstanding, progress over a short time. This is because of the intensive teaching and support they receive.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
There is little difference in the progress made by pupils eligible for extra support through the pupil premium and others in the school and they reach similar standards to other pupils. The small number of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs and other pupils whose circumstances may make them vulnerable also do well thanks to the effective, personal teaching and support they are given.
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
The quality of teaching has improved since the last inspection. Lessons are well paced and teachers make clear to pupils what they are going to learn. There is a good range of activities to keep pupils interested, and resources such as electronic whiteboards and computers add sparkle to learning. Teaching is not outstanding because lesson introductions are sometime too long, there are aspects of the teaching of writing that require some improvement and a lack of sharing the most effective methods of teaching between all staff. Staff in the Early Years Foundation Stage provide a stimulating, spacious and welcoming classroom area. Children gain confidence quickly and learn to listen, take turns and work cooperatively and individually. There is a good balance between activities supported by adults and those that children choose for themselves. Speaking and listening skills and children’s personal development improve rapidly thanks to the many well thought out opportunities and
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
activities that children enjoy. Well-focused and expertly applied questioning techniques make pupils think hard. In a small number of lessons, teachers talk for too long to the whole class rather than allowing pupils to get on with their work. As a result, pupils do not always have enough time to practise their writing skills. The work pupils are asked to do is generally set at the right level because staff use information about pupils’ progress to plan interesting and challenging tasks. In these lessons, pupils usually progress swiftly as a result. In a small number of lessons, pupils are given work that is either too easy or too difficult when this happens their progress slows. Pupils’ work is regularly marked. They are praised for their efforts and given advice about how to improve their work. This helps their progress. Sometimes, the words used in marking are too difficult for some pupils. Also, although the advice given is good, pupils are not always expected,
p.5
The quality of teaching is good
or given time, to act upon it by correcting or editing their work. This is especially the case in lessons about writing. The sessions where the links between letters and sounds are taught are lively. They combine enjoyment and challenge and have benefitted all pupils, but especially those with little or no English. However, they have not yet had sufficient impact on pupils’ spelling, especially in Years 1 and 2.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Behaviour is much improved and is usually good. The majority of pupils are cooperative and eager to learn and are proud of their school. Occasionally, pupils get over excited when they are on the playground. The appointment of learning and behaviour mentors has provided much needed extra support to pupils with behavioural difficulties. The better communication and relationships between home and school that have been established have helped to improve the behaviour and attendance of some pupils. Some parts of the current behaviour policies are effective and are valued by most pupils but some sanctions are no longer necessary. Some of these involve writing or other activities that are a part of lessons and this is sending the wrong message to pupils about the value and importance of their learning. Pupils say bullying has decreased greatly but also say it does happen sometimes and usually involves name calling. They say it is dealt with promptly and effectively and that they feel safe in
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
school. Behaviour in lessons is good and sometimes outstanding. Pupils occasionally become restless and start to chat to their classmates when they are required to listen to the teacher for too long. Attendance hovers around the national average but is beginning to rise. The school has a small core of persistent absentees, but has put a range of programmes in place that are making a difference. These include rewarding good attendance and the learning mentor vigorously following up absences.
p.5
The leadership and management are good
Since the last inspection, the focused and hardworking headteacher, supported by her willing colleagues and governors, has successfully identified the issues central to improving pupils’ achievement, behaviour and the quality of teaching. Key staff have been delegated and embraced the responsibility to contribute to making the school more successful. Success is evident in the improvement in important areas, such as pupils’ knowledge of letters and sounds, behaviour, attendance and in the Early Years Foundation Stage. The school has a clear view of priorities and practical and well-crafted plans have been put into place. The school has improved since the last inspection and shows good capacity to continue to improve in the future. The school’s leaders check how well school is doing much more carefully and systematically than at the time of the last inspection. They hold staff responsible for the progress of the pupils in
p.5
The leadership and management are good
their care. This has been an important factor in raising achievement and improving teaching. The school’s new systems for tracking pupils’ progress are helping teachers to set realistic and challenging targets for pupils and to identify those who need extra help. The funds received for those pupils eligible for the pupil premium are being used very effectively to give them individual teaching and to address any attendance or behavioural issues. As a result, most of these pupils are achieving in line with their classmates. This demonstrates the school’s determination to ensuring equality of opportunity and tackling discrimination. The school closely checks teaching and provides support and training where it is needed. Although the sharing of good practice is not fully established, there is little variation in teaching between classes. Leaders have put systems in place to meet the requirements of the new
p.6
The leadership and management are good
regulations for checking on the performance of staff and ensuring that they have the training they need to bring about improvements. Teachers who meet challenging targets linked to progress are considered for additional pay. The local authority provides effective support for the teaching of English and mathematics and has contributed to the improvements made since the last inspection. The curriculum provides good opportunities for all pupils to improve most of their basic skills through a topic based approach that pupils find very enjoyable and engaging. However, pupils do not always have enough opportunities to produce long pieces of writing. A varied programme of visits and visitors for all pupils makes learning enjoyable. There is a good range of sporting, cultural and artistic clubs and activities for pupils at lunchtimes and after school. There are good local links and partnerships within the community and overseas and with other
p.6
The leadership and management are good
schools that help ensure pupils gain knowledge and experience of other faiths and cultures, an issue at the last inspection. Parents say that communication is good and appreciate the monthly newsletter they receive from the school. They have good opportunities to take part in school life. Many were attending a very successful and lively Christmas Fair held in school during the inspection. The governance of the school: - The recently reconstituted governing body is led well. Members use their considerable expertise unselfishly to support the school. Governors have ensured that there are effective safeguarding systems in place. They are well aware of their responsibilities to check that teachers are performing well enough to justify increases in pay. They receive regular information about how the pupil premium is spent and check that this has an impact on their achievement of these pupils. The governors are well informed about the school’s performance
p.6
The leadership and management are good
and ask difficult questions when necessary.
p.6
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.7
School details
Unique reference number 108215 Local authority Wakefield Inspection number 405156
p.8
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 193 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair John Stone Headteacher Sarah Talbot Date of previous school inspection 6 October 2010 Telephone number 01924 303750 Fax number 01924 303751 Email address headteacher@mount.wakefield.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.9
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.9
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.9
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion