Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Mark Sims
- Postcode verified
HR2 0PT
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 554
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 35, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Sian McGrath Headteacher Michaelchurch Escley Primary School Michaelchurch Escley Hereford HR2 0PT
p.1
Education act 2005 to Michaelchurch Escley Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 10 December 2012, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Education act 2005 to Michaelchurch Escley Primary School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in September 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with the headteacher, a senior leader, members of the Governing Body including the Chair, a small group of pupils, two parents and a representative of the local authority. The school improvement plan was evaluated as was the behaviour improvement plan and other documents including data and tracking information on pupil achievement.
p.1
Context
There have been no changes since the school was inspected in September 2012
p.1
Main findings
Serco Inspections Cedar House 21 William Street Edgbaston Birmingham B15 1LH T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0121 683 3289 Direct email :elizabeth.rashvand@serco.com Since her appointment in September the headteacher has accurately identified priorities for improvement. She has successfully engaged the whole school community, including pupils and parents, in focusing on raising standards and improving pupils’ attitudes to learning. Teachers are held to account through regular lesson observations and pupil progress meetings. Teachers take greater responsibility for pupil data. The school tracking system ensures that pupils at risk of not making enough progress are quickly identified. Recent assessments are in place as a starting point to monitor pupil progress.
p.1
Main findings
A daily phonics lesson has been introduced to accelerate pupils’ progress in reading. Pupils report that there have been improvements to behaviour and attitudes to learning as a result of more engaging lessons. Parents recognise an increased ‘impetus and momentum’ since the new headteacher started. The amalgamated governing body is experienced and knowledgeable. It fully supports the need to raise pupil achievement and is challenging leaders effectively through questioning and visits to the school including observation of lessons.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommend that further action is taken to:
p.2
Main findings
Ensure the behaviour for learning action plan has clear milestones and dates and indicates who is responsible for monitoring and evaluating its impact Monitor the effectiveness of how well teaching assistants are deployed and what is the impact of intervention and support for pupils Provide further learning opportunities for those pupils who have been identified as not making sufficient progress to narrow the gap in attainment through more effective support.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The local authority is providing effective support for the school. It has been actively involved in monitoring teaching, supporting newly qualified staff and the governing body and performance management. It has also provided additional consultancy for literacy and early years.
p.2
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Herefordshire.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion