Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Rossmore School
Summary
Jennifer Platt (lead), Lenford White
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
28 Nov 2012
- Inspectors verified
Jennifer Platt, Lenford White
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Satisfactory
- Postcode verified
CH66 1HF
- Name on report verified
Rossmore School
- URN verified
111112
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2007.
- OverallGood
- Leadership and managementGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.7
- Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs make good progress and some make outstanding progress. p.4
- Children in the Early Years Foundation Stage make good progress because of the focus on enjoyment and practical activities. p.1
- and has a clear view of what is needed to make the school outstanding. p.1
- For example, the focus on including pupils in assessing their own learning was seen to be very effective in lessons during the inspection. p.5
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. p.7
- In Key Stage 1, pupils’ writing is not always neat and includes errors in punctuation. p.1
- Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. p.7
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 2,179
- shorter than usual (typical 2966)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 16%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Rossmore School Red Lion Lane, Little Sutton, Ellesmere Port, Cheshire, CH66 1HF
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a good school. Pupils make good progress and leave school with standards that are above average in reading, writing and mathematics. Pupils supported with extra funding, known as the pupil premium, disabled pupils and those with special educational needs make good and sometimes outstanding progress. This is because teachers spot quickly when they need extra help and provide this most effectively. Teaching is typically good. Teachers have good knowledge of the subjects they teach. Lessons are interesting and include activities like drama and writing about recent visits. Children in the Early Years Foundation Stage make good progress because of the focus on enjoyment and practical activities. Pupils say they feel safe and confidently approach staff with any worries. Their behaviour is typically good and most are eager to learn. Attendance is above average. The leadership team works closely together
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
and has a clear view of what is needed to make the school outstanding. Improved systems to check on pupils’ progress provide a precise overview of how well pupils are doing. Effective leadership has ensured standards and the quality of teaching have improved since the previous inspection. The school is well placed to continue to get better.
p.1
It is not yet an outstanding school because
The more-able pupils do not always have enough opportunities to work independently at hard enough work. Occasionally, pupils have to listen for too long and start to lose interest in the lesson. In Key Stage 1, pupils’ writing is not always neat and includes errors in punctuation. The governing body needs to check more closely that extra funding to support pupils under the pupil premium initiative is being allocated specifically to the intended pupils and is having a positive impact on their education. Pupils are not well informed about what life is like in a multicultural society.
p.1
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed teaching in all classes. They visited six lessons. Meetings were held with staff, a group of pupils, members of the governing body and a phone call discussion was held with a representative of the local authority. Pupils from different classes read to the inspectors. Inspectors looked at pupils’ books with a focus on writing in Years 2 and 6. Inspectors scrutinised a range of documents, including the school’s plan for future improvements, information about pupils’ progress and safeguarding. The views of nine parents were analysed through the on-line questionnaire (Parent View) website. Other parents shared their opinions about the school at the start of the school day. Inspectors analysed 11 returns by staff to the inspection questionnaire.
p.2
Inspection team
Jennifer Platt, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Lenford White Additional Inspector
p.2
Information about this school
The school is smaller than the average sized primary school. Almost all pupils are of White British heritage. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for the pupil premium (additional government funding provided for children in local authority care, those from service families and those known to be eligible for free school meals) is above average. The proportion of pupils supported at school action is below average. The proportion supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is below average. The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress in English and mathematics.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve progress and the quality of teaching to outstanding by: - ensuring that teachers consistently meet the needs of pupils more precisely throughout lessons, especially those of the more able - checking work is always hard enough and pupils have enough opportunities to work independently - keeping the pace of lessons brisk and adjusting lessons when pupils get restless - having higher expectations of handwriting and punctuation in Key Stage 1.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the impact of the governing body by checking that pupil premium funding is spent on the needs of the pupils for whom it is intended and that it has a positive effect on their achievement.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Extend opportunities for pupils to learn about other faiths and cultures.
p.3
The achievement of pupils is good
Children start school with knowledge and skills that are generally below those typical for their age although this varies because of the small numbers involved. They make good progress especially in their reading and writing skills and in their ability to work with others. The children are well prepared for learning as they move to Year 1. Success in teaching pupils their letters and sounds is evident in the above average results of the national assessment in Year 1. Pupils in Years 1 to 6 make good progress. Attainment at the end of Year 2 has generally been above average over the last three years. Attainment is higher in reading and mathematics. Pupils make good use of their skills to tackle new words when reading and apply their number skills to solve simple problems. Although pupils’ attainment in writing is above average, it is not quite as high as the other subjects because pupils do not always present their work well ensuring it is
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
neat and accurate. At the end of Year 6, attainment has been more variable although it has now risen to above average. The results of national reading tests in 2012 were disappointing for the school as fewer pupils than predicted exceeded the level expected for their age. Swift action, including an improved library and more attention to reading in small groups, resolved this weakness. Currently, attainment is above average with a half of the pupils on track to gain the higher level and pupils showing more enthusiasm for reading. Writing improves in Key Stage 2 and most pupils write neatly with accurate use of grammar and punctuation. The school is continuing its focus on raising pupils’ confidence to solve problems in mathematics. Attainment in this subject is above average. Although more-able pupils make good progress overall, there are occasions in lessons when they could be given more opportunities to work independently at even harder work to make sure their
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
progress is consistently good. The school provides good support for those pupils known to be eligible for the pupil premium. Staff focus on their social as well as academic needs, for example in bringing pupils to school in the mini-bus, so that they take full advantage of what the school offers. As a result, they make good progress. Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs make good progress and some make outstanding progress. Every class has a teaching assistant who is trained and involved in planning with teachers. As a result, they play a key role in supporting pupils in class as well as leading small groups.
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
Teaching is good with only a few inconsistencies between classes. All lessons are organised efficiently and teachers explain very clearly what pupils are to learn. Teachers have good subject knowledge and check that skills learnt in one lesson are developed in the next so that pupils make good progress. Most lessons are enjoyable and often include a variety of activities that make learning more interesting. This is certainly the case in the Early Years Foundation Stage where teachers focus on learning through practical experiences. The children enjoyed acting out the role of Goldilocks, discovering which bed was the biggest and writing a letter to the bears apologising for the mess made by Goldilocks. This combination of activities under one theme sustained the children’s pleasure in learning. In Years 1 to 6, teachers also add interest to lessons by effective use of technology. They use a visualiser that enables teachers to display pupils’ work on screen to great effect. It allows pupils
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
to share good quality work as well as spot how it can be improved. The practice of involving pupils in checking their work is apparent in most lessons. As a result, pupils in Year 6 declare confidently when they have a problem and the teacher encourages others to offer advice before stepping in to check all are ready to move on. This enables pupils to become independent learners. However, this is not the case in some lessons when teachers provide too much guidance rather than allowing pupils to come up with their own ideas. Most lessons go at a brisk pace but at times teachers talk for too long or include just that extra bit of advice which leads to pupils, especially the more-able, losing interest. The pace of lessons picks up as pupils move to their tasks that are usually matched more closely to their needs. However, this is not always the case and more-able pupils say that work is sometimes too easy.
p.5
The quality of teaching is good
Support staff play a crucial part in lessons and are deployed most effectively to where they are needed. This enables pupils of all ability to be fully involved in lessons and reflects the school’s good promotion of equality of opportunity. Teachers manage pupils’ behaviour effectively and only occasionally do pupils’ actions disturb others. Overall, the good teaching prepares pupils both socially and academically for the next stage of their education.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Children in the Early Years Foundation Stage enjoy school and make friends quickly. They understand it is important to share and most behave well. In Key Stages 1 and 2, behaviour is typically good. Pupils are eager to be involved and there is always a positive response to questions. Minor disturbances occur when pupils lose interest but support staff are quick to move in and refocus their attention. A discussion with pupils revealed good understanding of all types of bullying. They do not see bullying as a major problem although they identified some name-calling which they felt was unkind. Pupils in this group did not fully appreciate that some comments were of a racist nature and they were not well informed about life in a multicultural society. Pupils are polite and friendly. They are courteous to visitors and proud of their school. Great pleasure is drawn from collaboration and partner discussions. Pupils enjoy helping each other.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Pupils feel safe. They are aware of the dangers of using the internet and explain how to block any dangers and avoid sharing information. They know they can approach staff with any worries and they will sort them out. Parents are positive about behaviour and the support their children receive.
p.5
The leadership and management is good
The headteacher has changed the way that the school is led since the last inspection. All staff are now members of a leadership team rather than having individual leaders of subjects. For a small school this is effective in ensuring that no member of staff has too many responsibilities and that all feel involved. As a result, leadership is very much a team approach and all are clear about how well the school is doing as well as what needs to be improved. The checking on pupils’ progress has improved and more attention is given to those who may start to underachieve. As a result, disabled pupils and those with special educational needs often make more progress than other pupils. There are regular meetings between teachers and the headteacher to discuss pupils’ progress, and staff are now more responsible for the achievement of pupils in their class. The headteacher checks on the quality of teaching. Other members of staff check on what is
p.5
The leadership and management is good
happening in lessons by examining pupils’ work and observing specific aspects, such as the guided reading sessions. Staff are keen to share their experiences and adjust their teaching in the light of feedback they receive. As a result, teaching is consistently good with only minor variations between classes. Training for all staff is linked to the school’s priorities. For example, the focus on including pupils in assessing their own learning was seen to be very effective in lessons during the inspection. The evaluation of teachers’ performance and the award of salary increases are closely linked to the quality of teaching and pupils’ progress. The curriculum includes memorable experiences and pupils enjoy special topic weeks. Displays show this produces high quality work. It is a great achievement for a small school to have a band and a choir. Visits are the highlight for many, with Year 2 going on residential and Year 6
p.5
The leadership and management is good
planning their future stay in London. The curriculum promotes pupils’ personal development effectively except for limited opportunity to learn about other cultures. Links with the local authority are effective. Support is made available as it is needed. For example, advice was offered to raise pupils’ skills in problem solving. The governance of the school: Governors have resolved the issues identified in the previous inspection and now ensure targets set are very challenging. They are linked to a specific class and a management team and so have an accurate picture of performance and the quality of teaching. Members of the governing body review data about pupils’ progress and are clear about actions taken to raise attainment. They seek support from the local authority when setting performance targets for the headteacher and are sure that targets for other members of staff are sufficiently ambitious. Governors take advantage of training especially on health and safety. They ensure
p.6
The leadership and management is good
safeguarding meets requirements. They keep a close eye on overall spending and ask questions to ensure money is spent wisely. However, governors need to check more closely that the extra resources to support pupils under the pupil premium initiative are having a positive outcome. Nevertheless, the governors are effective in their role and their impact can be seen in the improvements in the school.
p.6
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.7
School details
Unique reference number 111112 Local authority Cheshire West and Chester Inspection number 401170
p.8
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 124 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Anthony Williams Headteacher Susan Davis-McCoy Date of previous school inspection 26 May 2010 Telephone number 0151 338 2425 Fax number 0151 348 1342 Email address head@rossmore.cheshire.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.9
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.9
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.9
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion