Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home, Residential special school run by Kedleston (Wings Education) Limited in Westmorland and Furness
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
31 Oct 2012
- Inspectors verified
Julia Toller
- URN verified
SC048552
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection. p.3
- Although the manager has submitted reports in line with Regulation 34, they are not yet sufficiently evaluative to demonstrate the strengths and weaknesses of the home and to plan action to improve the service for young people. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- encourage children to take appropriate risks as a normal part of growing up. p.4
- Children are helped to understand how to keep themselves safe including outside the home and when using the internet or social media (NMS 4.4) p.4
- ensure that Regulation 34 reports are completed at six monthly intervals, sent to Ofsted within 28 days of its completion and that they identify any trends and issues of concern arising from monitoring of matters set out in Schedule 6 (Volume 5, statutory guidance, paragraph 3.14) p.4
- ensure that the home implements a proportionate approach to any risk assessment, in particular that risks are assessed on an individual basis with regard to independence and access to social media. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 940
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC048552 Inspection date 31/10/2012 Inspector Julia Toller Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Residential special school (>295 days/year)
p.1
Date of last inspection 10/05/2012 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Brief description of the service
This is a privately owned residential special school, which is also registered as a children’s home. It provides a service to 59 young people, between the ages of 11 and 17 years, who experience emotional or behavioural difficulties.
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress .
p.3
Progress
At the previous full inspection this service was judged as adequate. Since then the service has made good progress. With the exception of one recommendation about access to social media, all requirements and recommendations raised at the last inspection have been met.
p.3
Progress
The manager has now been successful in their application to Ofsted for the position of Registered Manager at the school. He is starting to have a positive impact on the service. Young people spoke about the manager in a positive way saying, ‘you can tell he cares’, and, ‘this is the first year we have had a proper summer holiday it was great’. The Statement of Purpose now clearly outlines the independence system that the home operates called ‘independent walking’. Young people were clear about what this means for them and their individual circumstances. They move freely around the various houses and the grounds. This was an area of improvement that young people identified, saying that the manager now approaches them to suggest they are ready for more independence. Whilst risk assessments are clear about how young people are safeguarded during 'free time', the practice of young people ‘applying’ for independence was discussed at length and this is an area for further
p.3
Progress
consideration and consultation with young people.
p.4
Progress
Although the manager has submitted reports in line with Regulation 34, they are not yet sufficiently evaluative to demonstrate the strengths and weaknesses of the home and to plan action to improve the service for young people. The recommendation about young people’s access to social media is not yet fully met. Although the home has developed a policy regarding this matter, it is restrictive to individual’s needs and abilities as they grow up. It is acknowledged that some young people living at the home have high risk behaviours or backgrounds that may require such restrictions. However, risk assessments do not show whether individual risks in accessing social media are considered alongside their positive behaviours, age and understanding. Therefore the current policy does not adequately prepare young people for adult life.
p.4
Progress
Some significant progress has been made since the previous inspection. Notably the revision of consultation processes with young people. All young people, including those who use residential provision, are able to ‘have their say’ about their school. There are a variety of additional meetings that provide young people with a choice of forums where their voice can be heard. Young people speak highly of the school, they say that they, ‘feel safe living here’, ‘staff are great’, and, ‘things are getting better’. More importantly young people say they know how to access the systems and are listened to; they do not always get the answer they want but are always given an explanation.
p.4
Progress
Young people reflect on their progress regularly with staff, which helps to keep them focused and look to the future with increased positivity. They say they can learn from their mistakes in a supportive environment, helping them to thrive emotionally and socially. They describe their incentive schemes, including travelling to mountain bike courses across the country. They have also used their incentive rewards as part payment for trips such as skiing and go on day trips out to theme parks and the cinema. This shows that young people understand positive behaviour and enjoy the rewards they have earned. Young people say that their recent summer holiday was a great improvement and success, this was something that they had not previously experienced and they hope will happen again!
p.4
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):
p.4
Recommendations
encourage children to take appropriate risks as a normal part of growing up. Children are helped to understand how to keep themselves safe including outside the home and when using the internet or social media (NMS 4.4) ensure that Regulation 34 reports are completed at six monthly intervals, sent to Ofsted within 28 days of its completion and that they identify any trends and issues of concern arising from monitoring of matters set out in Schedule 6 (Volume 5, statutory guidance, paragraph 3.14) ensure that the home implements a proportionate approach to any risk assessment, in particular that risks are assessed on an individual basis with regard to independence and access to social media. (NMS 4.5)
p.4
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.6
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection (March 2011).
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion