Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Duty of Care Limited in Durham

Inspected 25 Oct 2012 · published 13 Dec 2012 · URN SC392549

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Dennis Bradley

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    25 Oct 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Dennis Bradley

  • URN verified

    SC392549

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 33% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisegood progresseffectivelycaringimprovedenjoysafeclearindependent
Criticisminadequatefailednot metdeclined

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings826w−6
  • What needs to improve62w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
884
shorter than usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 50
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
2
typical 4
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 83%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 10%

Full report text

Unique reference number SC392549 Inspection date 25/10/2012 Inspector Dennis Bradley Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home

p.1

Date of last inspection 26/06/2012 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Brief description of the service

This children's home is registered to provide care and accommodation for three children with emotional and behavioural problems. The home is owned and operated by a private provider.

p.3

The inspection judgements and what they mean

Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.

p.3

Progress

Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress .

p.3

Progress

The home was judged to be good at the last full inspection. Since then the staff have worked effectively to further improve the service. There were three recommendations made at the last inspection. Action has been taken to address two of these. All staff now receive formal supervision once a month, as specified in the home’s Statement of Purpose. This helps staff to have a good understanding of young people’s needs and how to support them and keep them safe. Staff are developing young people’s placement plans to ensure they identify clear, measureable outcomes. This will help to identify and evaluate the progress being made in meeting each young person’s individual needs. A third recommendation relating to the recruitment and vetting of new staff is not applicable. No new staff have been recruited since the last inspection. This recommendation will be followed up at the next inspection of the home.

p.3

Progress

The management team continually monitors and reviews the quality of care provided by the service. There is also an external quality monitoring programme that involves monthly visits to the home. However, the report format used by the visitor does not specifically cover how young people are supported to achieve their educational potential and pursue their individual interests and hobbies. Consequently, visits do not routinely focus on this important area of young people’s care and development.

p.3

Progress

The management team is good at using the outcomes of the internal and external monitoring of the service to assess how it can improve. One development is that all staff now have a relevant qualification in caring for young people and some are enrolled on training leading to further relevant qualifications. The home’s staff induction booklet has also been developed to include, for example, written exercises for staff to complete so they can demonstrate their understanding of each topic. Also, the personal development plans for staff now include a section asking them to comment on how their practice has benefited from the training they received. These measures help ensure that young people receive care and support from staff who have a good understanding of how to meet their needs.

p.4

Progress

There have also been improvements in the way young people and others, such as parents and social workers, are consulted about the service provided by the home. For example, young people meet with their keyworker each month to review their progress and the care and support they receive. They complete a consultation document which identifies any issues or matters that need to be addressed. This is one of the ways in which young people are actively involved in decisions about their care and the running of the home. Staff have also recently devised a survey for relevant professionals to complete when a young person moves out of the home. This asks for their views about how the support provided by the home has contributed to outcomes for the young person and how it could be improved. Staff said feedback they receive will be used to support improvements to the service and the quality of care provided.

p.4

Progress

Staff have also been reviewing and amending some of the home’s policies and procedures to make sure they are up to date. The young person’s guide to the home has also been revised to include additional information and make it more child friendly. However, the current format does not include some important information, such as how young people can contact their independent reviewing officer or the Children’s Rights Director. This could make it more difficult for a young person to access appropriate support if they wish to complain or make a representation about the care offered to them by the home.

p.4

Recommendations

To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):

p.4

Recommendations

 ensure visits carried out under Regulation 33 scrutinise how the home is supporting children to enjoy and achieve (Statutory Guidance, volume 5, paragraph 3.12)  ensure the young people’s guide to the home includes all the information specified in NMS 13.5. (NMS 13.5)

p.4

About this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.

p.6

About this inspection

The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection (March 2011).

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion