Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 13 Dec 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Philip Mann

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Philip Mann

  • Postcode verified

    WD6 3EW

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−7Mixedmore positive than 21% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrengthseffectiveeffectivelyclearimprovingsecure
Criticismweaknessesinconsistenciesyet togaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
560
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mrs K Johnston-Grant Headteacher St Nicholas Elstree Church of England VA Primary School St Nicholas Close Elstree Borehamwood WD6 3EW

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 26 November 2012, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills, to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in September 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with the headteacher, senior leaders with responsibility for English and mathematics, members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority. The inspector looked at pupils work in English and mathematics and evaluated the action plan.

p.1

Context

There have been no changes to the staffing since the previous inspection. Two governing body vacancies have been filled but one vacancy still remains. Serco Inspections Cedar House 21 William Street Edgbaston Birmingham B15 1LH T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0121 683 3263 Direct email :lewis.mackie1@serco.com

p.1

Main findings

The action plan provides a clear structure for school improvement. Actions have been prioritised to address the areas for improvement identified at the last inspection, with specific timescales set against realistic targets. These actions need to be fully embedded in classroom practice to ensure that all pupils achieve well in their writing and mathematics. Discussions with school leaders and those with specific responsibility for leading the teaching of English and mathematics believe that there is a sharper focus on improving the quality of teaching and the achievement of pupils in all classes. However, their regular monitoring of lessons and pupils’ books shows that inconsistencies in the quality of teachers’ marking still remain.

p.2

Main findings

Governors demonstrate a growing level of understanding about the school’s strengths and weaknesses through focused visits and meetings with subject leaders. The action plan has been discussed at governing body meetings but a detailed review of the school’s progress on the issues from the last inspection is yet to take place. However, governors have undertaken training to fill gaps in their knowledge such as safeguarding and finance.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommend that further action is taken to:

p.2

Main findings

 provide further training to teachers about how good feedback and marking can be used effectively to accelerate pupil achievement in writing and mathematics  work with the local authority to provide governors with the necessary skills and expertise to monitor the school’s work and ask informed questions of leaders about school performance.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The local authority has put in place a specific programme of support. It includes regular reviews by local authority improvement officers to ensure that the school quickly tackles the key issues from the inspection to secure the necessary improvements in pupils’ outcomes.

p.2

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Hertfordshire and the Diocese. Yours sincerely

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion