Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 13 Dec 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Gehane Gordelier

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Gehane Gordelier

  • Postcode verified

    SO53 1EJ

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−22Mixedmore positive than 14% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyrigorousoutstandingeffectiverapid progressmake good progresswell plannedconfidently
Criticismweaknessesnot alwaysweaknessyet toweakfailsfalling behindrequires improvement

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1655w−21
  • Leadership641w−21

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
2,292
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
17%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%Leadership 26%About the inspection 5%

Full report text

Mrs Veronica Shaw Acting Headteacher Merdon Junior School Merdon Avenue Chandler's Ford Eastleigh SO53 1EJ

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Merdon Junior School

Following my visit to your school on 21 and 22 November 2012, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings.

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Merdon Junior School

The inspection was the second monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures following the inspection that took place in January 2012. The full list of the areas for improvement, which were identified during that inspection, is set out in the annex to this letter. The monitoring inspection report is attached and the main judgements are set out below.

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Merdon Junior School

Progress since being subject to special measures – satisfactory

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Merdon Junior School

Progress since previous monitoring inspection – satisfactory

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Merdon Junior School

One newly qualified teacher may be appointed, on the condition that mentoring support is provided by the acting headteacher’s school: Scantabout Primary.

p.1

Special measures: monitoring inspection of Merdon Junior School

This letter and monitoring inspection report will be posted on the Ofsted website. I am copying this letter and the monitoring inspection report to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Hampshire.

p.1

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Tribal 1–4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 3115319 Direct F 0117 3150430 Direct email : matthew.parker@tribalgroup.com

p.1

place in January 2012

 Raise attainment in writing so that it matches that in reading and ensure pupils meet the levels expected for their age by: - using assessment information to plan lessons that are well matched to all pupils’ abilities, particularly the most able - regularly reminding pupils of their individual targets, as well as those for the whole lesson - developing teachers’ marking so pupils understand exactly what to do to improve their work and know the next steps in their learning - providing greater opportunities for pupils to practise the skills they have learned in literacy lessons when writing in other subjects.

p.2

place in January 2012

 Ensure pupils make at least the expected progress in English and mathematics by: - raising teachers’ expectations of what all pupils should be able to achieve - maintaining sufficient pace and challenge in lessons - checking pupils’ progress regularly throughout the year so that underachieving pupils are identified quickly - intervening promptly in order to target support more effectively, especially for those pupils who are falling behind.

p.2

place in January 2012

 Improve leaders’ systematic monitoring and evaluation of the actions the school takes to remedy areas of weakness by: - ensuring improvement plans include rigorous measures of progress, tight deadlines and precise measures of success so that leaders can judge the progress the school is making - using assessment information effectively to set challenging targets for pupils’ progress, eradicate underachievement and enable pupils to make good progress and achieve well.

p.2

Evidence

The inspector observed the school’s work, scrutinised documents and checked the school’s single central record. Meetings were held with senior leaders, teachers, support staff, a group of pupils, a group of parents and carers, the Chair of the Governing Body and the District Manager from the local authority. The inspector observed eight lessons alongside either the headteacher or the deputy headteacher. One assembly was also seen.

p.3

Context

The former headteacher retired at the end of summer 2012. The local authority appointed an acting headteacher to work at Merdon Juniors from September 2012 until April 2013. The acting headteacher is the headteacher of a local primary school which was judged as outstanding by Ofsted in June 2009. The acting headteacher works at Merdon Juniors four days a week; the deputy headteacher at Merdon Juniors provides cover in her absence. There have been significant changes to the membership of the governing body. Four governors have left and three new governors have been appointed. The position of teacher governor has become vacant. In September 2012, the governing body elected a new Chair of the Governing Body and vice-chair.

p.3

Context

A new District Manager from the local authority has been allocated to the school; however, this is currently on a temporary basis.

p.3

Achievement of pupils at the school

The school did not meet its targets for the proportion of pupils who made at least expected progress in English and mathematics by the end of Year 6 in 2012. However, standards rose and were higher than they have been since 2010. Pupils made better progress in mathematics than in English. The pupils who made the least amount of progress were those who started Year 3 having reached the higher Level 3 at the end of Key Stage 1.

p.3

Achievement of pupils at the school

The school now collects and analyses information about pupils’ standards in English and mathematics in greater detail. This helps leaders, managers and teachers to set targets for pupils that are appropriate and are aimed at raising levels of attainment. Parents and carers and pupils welcome the use of targets as they help pupils to know what to aim for. Standards in mathematics and writing are now rising throughout the school. Gaps in attainment between different groups of pupils are reducing. This is particularly the case in mathematics because pupils are starting to use their mathematical skills more confidently. The best progress currently being made in writing is in Year 6; the slowest rate of progress is in Year 3. Pupils eligible for the Pupil Premium (additional government funding) are progressing as well as their peers across the school. However, due to underachievement in previous years they are behind other pupils in Year 6 in reading, writing and mathematics. Disabled

p.3

Achievement of pupils at the school

pupils and those with special educational needs are making the same amount of progress as their peers. A few parents and carers who have children with additional needs told the inspector that they were pleased with the support they receive from the school; however, some parents and carers told the inspector that they were not, and that they pay for additional tuition for their children outside of school to help their children to progress well.

p.4

Achievement of pupils at the school

Although standards of reading are generally high across the school, there is not always sufficient support for pupils of lower ability during class-based lessons to help with their reading. There is also not always enough challenge for the more-able pupils to develop their skills in reading, particularly lower down the school.

p.4

Achievement of pupils at the school

Progress since the last monitoring inspection on the areas for improvement:

p.4

Achievement of pupils at the school

 Raise attainment in writing so that it matches that in reading and ensure pupils meet the levels expected for their age – satisfactory

p.4

Achievement of pupils at the school

 Ensure pupils make at least the expected progress in English and mathematics – satisfactory

p.4

The quality of teaching

The school and local authority’s evaluations about the quality of teaching present a more positive picture than the teaching observed during this inspection. The quality of teaching in Year 6 is however consistently good. In the rest of the school, much of the teaching requires improvement, and some weaknesses remain. This highlights the fact that important features of good teaching in English and mathematics are still not well embedded in teachers’ daily practice.

p.4

The quality of teaching

Teachers make better use of information about pupils’ levels of attainment to raise their expectations of what pupils can achieve. With the exception of guided reading, for which expectations are at times too low, most lessons are well planned. This is because planning now takes better account of pupils’ needs and differing abilities. Teachers plan activities to challenge their more-able pupils. However, these activities do not always extend learning and levels of challenge are not introduced early enough during lessons. More teachers now remind pupils to refer to their targets during lessons and this helps pupils to take greater responsibility for their learning. Most teachers ask questions that help pupils to think and give good reasons for their answers.

p.4

The quality of teaching

Teachers actively seek opportunities for pupils to write in other subjects. They use visual aids to engage and motivate pupils, as well as some practical resources to support their learning. Teaching assistants support a wider range of pupils. They appreciate the clear guidance from teachers that helps them to be more effective, especially with those pupils who need extra support.

p.5

The quality of teaching

Despite the improvements made to teachers’ planning, some common weaknesses in teaching remain. Teachers do not always have on display the explanation of what pupils are expected to learn during lessons, including new technical vocabulary. This slows the rate of progress made by those pupils who benefit from having this information as a visual reminder. Too few teachers check pupils’ understanding and progress during lessons. This reduces their ability to identify those pupils who are either in need of additional support or who are ready for more challenge. All too often, this results in a slower pace of learning than is necessary. Mathematics lessons are usually not taught within a meaningful context. This results in pupils not understanding the value or purpose of what they are learning. Pupils told the inspector that some of their teachers still spend too much time talking, and this reduces the time they have left to get on and finish their work. They also

p.5

The quality of teaching

commented on how unhelpful they find the interruptions during mathematics and English lessons when pupils return from music lessons. They noted that additional time to their own learning is lost when teachers then spend time repeating information that has already been shared with the class. Teachers told the inspector that while this situation is much better than it was, it is still not fully resolved.

p.5

The quality of teaching

The quality of teachers’ marking in English and mathematics has significantly improved. Pupils now understand what they have to do to improve their work. They are also taking more responsibility for assessing and improving their own work. However, marking in other subjects, except for in science where it is usually done well, is very variable and at times weak.

p.5

The quality of teaching

Most teachers now make better use of homework to help pupils to practise their basic skills of reading, writing and mathematics at home. However, parents and carers are not fully aware of the school's homework policy or the different strategies used to teach some subjects, such as aspects of mathematics. Parents and carers have mixed views about the use of homework. Although a few parents and carers report that their children receive homework regularly and that teachers mark this work well, this is not the case for all classes.

p.5

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Pupils feel safe in school. They enjoy coming to school as demonstrated by their high levels of attendance. Pupils understand the different forms that bullying can take and the need to respect and value each other's differences. Good assemblies encourage pupils to become peacemakers and to learn how to resolve conflict. When behaviour is less than good, it is generally because teaching fails to engage pupils’ interests, or pupils become frustrated because they do not understand what they have to do.

p.5

The quality of leadership and management of the school

The acting headteacher and deputy headteacher have gained the confidence of staff and have stabilised the situation at the school. Staff feel valued and well supported during this difficult time of change, especially as a new headteacher has yet to be appointed. The acting headteacher and deputy headteacher make good use of information about pupils’ progress to challenge underperformance and identify those pupils in need of additional support. This is already leading to a reduction in the proportion of pupils who underachieve. However, they have yet to compare the progress made by different classes within the same year group and the achievement of pupils of different ability. The mathematics and science leaders are developing their roles well.

p.6

The quality of leadership and management of the school

There is now regular and more rigorous monitoring of the quality of teaching and learning. The deputy headteacher is particularly astute at identifying strengths and weaknesses in teaching. However, the school's records of lessons observed do not record the value added to pupils’ learning and do not focus enough on the progress made by different groups of pupils. Nevertheless, staff appreciate the timely and quality feedback they receive about their practice and say this is helping them to improve.

p.6

The quality of leadership and management of the school

School self-evaluation is not sufficiently thorough. As a result, important weaknesses are not identified, and judgements about the school’s performance are at times over generous. Improvement plans for the whole school as well as for subjects lack detail. This limits the ability of leaders, managers and governors to measure progress precisely. Some timescales are too open and there is not enough information about key aspects of the school’s work that need to get better quickly. This includes the actions to be taken to improve teaching and information about what is required in individual education plans. This, together with some key leadership and management roles still being underdeveloped, is compromising the school's ability to build the capacity to sustain improvement. Senior leaders recognise that the senior leadership team, and particularly the leadership and management of English and special educational needs, needs to be reorganised to

p.6

The quality of leadership and management of the school

ensure the school is best placed to make rapid progress.

p.6

The quality of leadership and management of the school

Many governors are new to the role and will need to get up to speed very quickly to help the school to continue to progress. The governing body has yet to ensure it meets all its statutory duties, for example in terms of monitoring and evaluating the impact of the school’s equality of opportunity policy. Progress since the last monitoring inspection on the areas for improvement:

p.6

The quality of leadership and management of the school

 Improve leaders’ systematic monitoring and evaluation of the actions the school takes to remedy areas of weakness – satisfactory

p.7

External support

The quality and impact of the external support provided to the school have been satisfactory overall. This has helped to improve relationships between staff and the school’s leaders. Pockets of good support include that provided by the Primary Phase Inspectors. This has helped the school to develop and improve the way it tracks the progress made by pupils. Guidance for staff from Primary Phase Inspectors has helped them to improve the quality of planning in English and mathematics, and has also supported the leadership of English, mathematics and science. The local authority’s helpful reviews clearly identify what needs to improve within the leadership of special educational needs, English and mathematics. However, there has not been enough focus on the learning and progress of different groups of pupils.

p.7

External support

The targets in the original statement of action have proved overambitious. As it stands, this document is no longer as helpful as it should be to help the school in planning for improvement.

p.7

External support

The delay in advertising for a new headteacher has proved unsettling for parents and carers and staff. Nevertheless, the local authority has done well to secure the services of a highly experienced acting headteacher. The Primary Phase Inspector and District Manager also provide effective support.

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion