Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 12 Dec 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Patricia Metham

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Patricia Metham

  • Postcode verified

    BN1 1LB

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+41Positivemore positive than 45% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositiveeffectivelyeffectiveaccurate
Criticismyet to

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadership positive critical
  • Findings252w0
  • Leadership500w+41

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
744
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 35, typical 45
Average sentence
24 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 34%Leadership 66%

Full report text

Mrs J. Jones Headteacher St Mary’s Catholic Primary School Church Road Brighton BN1 1LB

p.1

Catholic Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 26 November, 2012, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the outcome and inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Catholic Primary School

This monitoring inspection visit was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection, meetings were held with: you and members of your senior leadership team; the Chair of Governors and the local authority representative on the governing body; the diocesan representative supporting your school, together with two representatives from the local authority; and a group of pupils from Year 3 and Year 4. Minutes of governors’ meetings, the school improvement plan and the action plan for the raising of achievement were evaluated, which included up-to-date analysis of pupils’ standards and progress.

p.1

Context

Few changes have been made since the last section 5 inspection. A new teacher has taken over the Year 3 class and the local authority representative supporting the school’s overall progress has changed. Her predecessor is now providing specific guidance and support for the headteacher. Tribal 1–4 Portland Square BRISTOL BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5307 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Direct email : emma.thomson@ tribalgroup.com

p.1

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Significant changes were made to the school’s leadership and management at the start of the school year; a new deputy headteacher and assessment co-ordinator have been appointed. The school’s still-evolving development plan supports priorities identified by the recently restructured governing body and by the local authority, and that were highlighted at the recent inspection.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Your positive relationship with the diocese underpins the school’s values, and your support for recent changes creates confidence. With vigorous and persuasive leadership from the acting deputy headteacher – described by pupils as ‘awesome’ – a system has been established that ensures all aspects of teaching and learning are closely monitored, more challenging targets set and governors actively involved as well-informed ‘critical friends’. The Chair of Governors, for example, is part of the language team, focusing on English, modern foreign languages, reading, writing, spelling, handwriting, speaking and listening. Members of the senior leadership team demonstrate that changes to what is taught and how it is taught are practical and productive; they model good teaching and manage pupils’ effectively without being heavy-handed. The impact on pupils’ standards and progress has yet to be seen but staff morale has been re-invigorated.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Senior leaders and governors have begun to take effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommend that further action is taken to ensure that:  close and regularly updated analysis of pupils’ progress is used in the planning of lessons, so that the needs of all are met  feedback to teachers is detailed and practical and sets priorities for further training or support, and that action points are always followed up to check that improvements are being sustained  leaders and managers at all levels set challenging targets for teachers and pupils and themselves model good practice.

p.2

External support

The local authority provides regular and constructive monitoring and well-targeted support – for example, guidance on teaching and learning in English, and training for governors. Support from the diocese benefits from the extensive headship experience brought by the new diocesan representative. The diocese and local authority work well together in challenging and supporting the school.

p.2

External support

Following the monitoring inspection visit the following judgement was made: taken with the plan for raising attainment, the school’s improvement plan is fit for purpose. To strengthen the implementation of action points in the two plans, the likely pattern of further intervention will be:  lesson observations and feedback to teachers  contribution to staff training, with a particular focus on matching expectations and activities to pupils’ differing abilities and ways of learning  work with governors to ensure that they set challenging targets for teachers, based on accurate analysis of information about progress made by all pupils, including pupils eligible for additional government funding through the Pupil Premium.

p.2

External support

I am copying this note of visit to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Brighton and Hove, and the Diocese.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion