Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 10 Dec 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Michael Smith

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Michael Smith

  • Postcode verified

    WS2 0JN

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+38Positivemore positive than 43% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisesuccessfuleffectiveclear
Criticismlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
756
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mr Rod Dickson Executive Headteacher The Bentley Federation King Charles Primary School Wilkes Avenue Walsall WS2 0JN

p.1

Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 20 November 2012, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Primary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in September 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with the Principal of the Federation, the acting head of school, the Chair and a representative of the Governing Body, a representative from the local authority and a group of pupils. The school action plans were evaluated.

p.1

Context

There have been no significant changes to staff or governors since the inspection, with the exception of the appointment of a teaching assistant to oversee reading support in Years 3, 4 and 5.

p.1

Main findings

The school has taken appropriate steps to improve the quality of teaching and to raise achievement. The system for tracking pupils’ progress is used to identify how Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 3115319 Direct F 0117 3150430 Direct email :matthew.parker@tribalgroup.com well pupils are achieving and pick up on any variations between different groups of pupils, for example those eligible for additional government funding.

p.1

Main findings

Staff have been set challenging targets relating to the progress pupils are expected to make in reading, writing and mathematics. These targets are in turn linked to the way in which the school checks how well teachers perform. The action plan covers the appropriate areas for improvement but criteria to see how well the school is succeeding do not include enough detail to enable governors to keep a check on progress. Neither does the action plan identify how improvements to the quality of teaching will be evaluated.

p.2

Main findings

There is now an overview of the monitoring which will take place and how it will be undertaken. This includes members of the governing body working alongside staff. English is led by the acting head of school and the Principal oversees mathematics across both schools. There are limited opportunities for other staff to take on a leadership role.

p.2

Main findings

Governors are aware of the need to give greater challenge to the school. They do not have the necessary expertise to analyse information to see if the school is successful in raising achievement. At present the instruments of governance for the federation have not been agreed with the Governing Body and the local authority.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders and governors have begun to take effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Following the visit to the school, HMI recommend that further action is taken to:

p.2

Main findings

 Strengthen the success criteria within the school’s action plans so they give clear outcomes which can be evaluated. Identify specific points in time when progress against each activity will be checked.

p.2

Main findings

 Extend opportunities to monitor of the quality of teaching to more staff.

p.2

Main findings

 Finalise the instruments of governance for the federation as a matter of urgency.

p.2

Main findings

The HMI will make a further visit to support school leaders in evaluating teaching through joint lesson observations. Also, after the review of the governing body planned by the local authority, holding a meeting to explain how governors can interpret data and better challenge senior leaders on the progress of pupils and hold the school to account for its use of pupil premium money.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The local authority has introduced a partnership review group to determine the effectiveness of the federation. It plans to undertake an evaluation of the Governing Body and to act upon the outcome to provide further support. The local authority has provided support to the school to improve the accuracy of assessments so that information to track the progress of pupils is more exact. The local authority have also ensured that the performance management of the Principal is completed. The school has identified suitable consultants to help them bring about the necessary improvements.

p.2

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Walsall.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion