Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Belmont Community School
Summary
John Paddick (lead), Christine Cottam, Gordon Potter, Jim Bennetts
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
15 Nov 2012
- Inspectors verified
Christine Cottam, Gordon Potter, Jim Bennetts, John Paddick
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Satisfactory
- Postcode verified
DH1 2QP
- Name on report verified
Belmont Community School
- URN verified
114308
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2007.
- OverallGood
- Leadership and managementGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.7
- Students with visual or hearing impairment make excellent progress in response to the high quality of specialist help they receive. p.4
- It clearly demonstrates that the school has excellent capacity for further development. p.5
- They have a clear and accurate view of the school’s strong features and provide effective challenge and support. p.5
- They have excellent subject knowledge and organise classroom activities well. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. p.7
- Exclusions for poor conduct are below average and falling. p.5
- Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. p.7
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 1,763
- shorter than usual (typical 2966)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 50, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Belmont Community School Buckinghamshire Road, Belmont, Durham, DH1 2QP
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a good school. The school is improving rapidly and all groups of students now make at least good progress and achieve well. GCSE results have risen quickly since the last inspection and compare very favourably with national figures. The school makes sure that students who are behind in their reading when they enter Year 7 make up lost ground really well. Students with visual or hearing impairment make outstanding progress. Students benefit from good teaching. Their teachers plan interesting and varied lessons that enable them to progress well. Students enjoy school. They are keen to do well and have good attitudes to learning. Their attendance is above average and their behaviour is good. A wide range of examination and vocational courses in Years 10 and 11 means that students have a very good choice of options. Good leadership and management at all levels, including governors, ensure that the school
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
continues to improve and provide good quality education for its students.
p.1
It is not yet an outstanding school because
There is not enough outstanding teaching to lift students’ achievement from good to outstanding. In some lessons, teachers do not cater fully for all students’ abilities. This means that a few find the tasks quite easy while small numbers sometimes struggle with them.
p.1
Information about this inspection
In this inspection, inspectors observed 30 lessons, including three joint observations with senior staff. They held meetings with the headteacher, representatives of the governing body, senior managers, middle managers, groups of students and a representative of the local authority. They looked at many documents, including governing body minutes, school self-evaluation, development planning, records of students’ progress and safeguarding procedures. They took account of 22 responses to the on-line questionnaire (Parent View) and responses to the staff questionnaire.
p.2
Inspection team
John Paddick, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Christine Cottam Additional Inspector Gordon Potter Additional Inspector Jim Bennetts Additional Inspector
p.2
Information about this school
Belmont Community School is smaller than average for a secondary school. Almost all students are White British. Proportions of students supported through school action, school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs are broadly average. There is specialist provision for students with visual or hearing impairment. The school enables students in Years 10 and 11 to attend BTEC vocational courses at Durham Federation, East Durham College and St Leonard’s Catholic School. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for pupil premium is just above average. The school meets the current government floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for students’ attainment and progress. The school has several awards, including Artsmark Gold, Investor in Children and a UNICEF award as a Rights Respecting School.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the overall quality of teaching from good to outstanding by: reducing the small amount of teaching that requires improvement improving the planning of some lessons so they cater well for students of all abilities using the existing outstanding practice as models for teachers to learn from making sure marking in all subjects includes enough detail to help students improve their work.
p.3
The achievement of pupils is good
GCSE results have improved rapidly since the previous inspection and are now securely above average in all respects. Students in all year groups make good progress and achieve well. They join Year 7 with broadly average attainment and go on to gain above average GCSE results in Year 11. The school enters some students for GCSE in Year 10. This gives them valuable examination experience and enables them to improve their grades when they are examined again in Year 11. In 2012, the proportion of pupils gaining five GCSE results in the range A* to C, including English and mathematics, was well above the national average for 2011. These results show that students have progressed very favourably compared to national expectations. Students do well in the vocational BTEC qualifications that they study in school and with external providers. The school has used its pupil premium funding well and is closing the gap between the GCSE
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
performance of all students and those known to be eligible for free school meals. Lesson observations during the inspection showed that students were usually making good or better progress. Evidence from their books shows that they make good progress over time. They take a pride in their work which is extensive and generally well presented. Their reading and writing skills fully support them in making good progress in other subjects. Students with visual or hearing impairment make excellent progress in response to the high quality of specialist help they receive. Frequently, they gain exceptional GCSE results. The school’s excellent tracking system enables managers at all levels to keep a careful watch on the progress levels of all students. When any student or group of students is not making at least good progress, they fully investigate the reasons and put extra help into place to enable them to
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
Teaching has improved substantially since the previous inspection in response to a concerted effort to accelerate learning in the classroom. The school’s own observations indicate that the large majority of teaching is at least good, a small amount requires improvement and some is outstanding. This closely matches the range of quality observed during the inspection. Evidence from the joint lesson observations indicates that the school’s observations are rigorous and accurate. Teachers demonstrate fully the qualities outlined in the national Teaching Standards. They have excellent subject knowledge and organise classroom activities well. They quickly build good relationships with students and generally promote a very good classroom atmosphere. This enables students to listen carefully, concentrate and, when required, work productively in groups and pairs. Lessons usually proceed at a brisk pace so students learn quickly and make good
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
progress. Where teaching is of the highest quality, students make impressive gains in skills, knowledge and confidence. This is because teachers plan with great care so learning is logically sequenced, rapid and crosses new boundaries. In the small number of lessons that require improvement, the teacher often plans for the whole class to do the same work. This results in some students finding the work quite easy and others unable to complete it in the time available. In a few lessons, the pace of learning slows when the teacher takes too long with explanations and questioning to check understanding. The marking of students’ work has improved since the previous inspection. It is good overall but varies from outstanding to requiring improvement. For example, marking in art, English and humanities is often carefully carried out and indicates exactly what pupils need to do to improve their work. However, some marking in science is insufficiently detailed and does not encourage
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
students to write as well as they do in English lessons.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Attitudes in lessons are usually very positive and it is clear that most students are eager to learn and do their best. Evidence strongly suggests that students’ behaviour observed during the inspection is typical of the day-to-day operation of the school. Students say that they enjoy school. They say that they feel very safe and that behaviour has improved markedly over the last two years. They understand homophobic, racist and cyber- bullying and say that incidents are rare. The school’s records support this very positive view. Very frequently, students’ conduct is impeccable and lessons proceed with a superb working atmosphere. However, occasionally in a small number of lessons, a few students become inattentive or restless when they are not really interested in what is going on. When students’ behaviour or attitudes fall below the school’s high expectations, members of staff are effective in improving them. Exclusions for poor conduct are below average and falling.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Students are justifiably proud of their contribution to the school. For example, they act as prefects, have helped to draw up school rules and expectations, and operate an effective anti- bullying group. Students with visual or hearing impairment take a full and active part in the life of the school. The school has an excellent system for monitoring students’ welfare and progress. If they fall behind in their learning or encounter difficulties of a personal nature members of staff soon intervene and help to put matters right. Students’ attendance is above average and improving because the school checks it carefully and takes action if it starts to slip.
p.5
The leadership and management are good
The school is very well led by the headteacher and senior team. This has resulted in substantial improvements in teaching, student attitudes and behaviour, and GCSE results since 2010. It clearly demonstrates that the school has excellent capacity for further development. Senior and middle managers work well together and promote a real sense of purpose among staff and students. Self-evaluation is accurate. Managers and members of the governing body have a clear idea of the school’s strong features and where there is still room for improvement. Management of teaching is good and promotes improving classroom practice but it is not consistently making the best use of the outstanding teaching to serve as models for other teachers to follow. Performance management arrangements are effective and any unsatisfactory teaching is tackled quickly. However, although records of lesson observations are accurate in
p.5
The leadership and management are good
terms of teaching quality they do not contain enough detail about the progress that different groups of students have made. Equality of opportunity has a high profile. Managers do their best to ensure that all groups of students do equally well. The success of these measures is reflected in the substantially improving GCSE results for students supported by pupil premium, which is spent on a wide range of very effective measures to raise attainment. It is also reflected in the high quality provision for students with visual or hearing impairment, and the reading programme which enables students who are behind in Year 7 to catch up. Safeguarding meets all requirements. Managers have designed a good curriculum which provides students with secure pathways towards a wide range of GCSE and vocational BTEC qualifications. It promotes their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development well through the provision of many extra-curricular
p.5
The leadership and management are good
activities, for example, visitors from Russia, China and Hong Kong, and visits to France, Spain, Germany and Iceland. The local authority has recognised that the school has improved quickly and now only provides light touch support by giving a second opinion on overall performance. The school communicates with parents well. Most feel that they are well informed about activities and their children’s progress. The website is informative and helpful. The governance of the school: Governors are very effective. They have a clear and accurate view of the school’s strong features and provide effective challenge and support. They also have a clear and accurate picture of the quality of teaching and ensure that teachers’ salary progression and promotions are merited. They ensure performance management arrangements are rigorous and productive.
p.5
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.7
School details
Unique reference number 114308 Local authority Durham Inspection number 401423
p.8
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Type of school Secondary School category Community Age range of pupils 11–16 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 685 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Raymond Pye Headteacher Judith Wilkinson Date of previous school inspection 10 February 2010 Telephone number 0191 3865715 Fax number 0191 3840583 Email address school@belmontschool.org.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.9
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.9
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.9
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion