Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Lydbury North CofE (A) Primary School

Inspected 14 Nov 2012 · published 29 Nov 2012 · URN 123547

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    14 Nov 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Mary Hinds

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    SY7 8AU

  • Name on report verified

    Lydbury North CofE (A) Primary School

  • URN verified

    123547

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2008.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+28Mostly positivemore positive than 6% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingexceptionallyimprovedenjoyexcellenthighly effectiveclearfeel safe
Criticismnot alwaysinadequateweaknessestoo fewrequires improvementlimitedweaknessserious

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1255w+42
  • Leadership787w+7
  • What needs to improve166w+62

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,134
shorter than usual (typical 2966)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 50, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
1
typical 2
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 42%Leadership 27%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 25%

Full report text

Lydbury North CofE (A) Primary School Lydbury North, Shropshire, SY7 8AU

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a good school.  Attainment has risen since the last inspection. Pupils achieve well in all key stages, and in all subjects, including the Early Years Foundation Stage.  Teaching is good. Teachers provide many activities which are practical, motivating and relevant to pupils. As a result, pupils enjoy their learning and try their best.  Pupils’ behaviour is good. They are thoughtful, respectful and have a clear understanding of right and wrong. Their attitudes contribute strongly to their learning  Pupils feel safe in school. Parents and carers also feel that the school keeps their children safe and secure.  Leaders have worked relentlessly to secure a unified team of staff and a joint governing body. They have ensured that throughout a period of significant changes, the quality of teaching and pupils’ achievement remain at the heart of the school’s improvement work.

p.1

It is not yet an outstanding school because

 There is not enough outstanding teaching that encourages pupils to work on their own or complete longer pieces of writing. Pupils do not always make rapid progress, especially more able pupils in writing and mathematics.  Pupils do not have opportunities to respond to teachers’ marking in their books.  Governors do not always use all the information available to know how well the school is performing in relation to all schools nationally.  The plans for improving the school do not have measurable targets to enable leaders to assess the success of their actions.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 The inspector visited seven lessons taught by three teachers and one teaching assistant. She listened to pupils read and observed an assembly.  The inspector held discussions with pupils, teachers, the headteacher, representatives of the governing body, and a local authority officer.  The inspector scrutinised a range of documents, including policies about keeping pupils safe. She also examined the work in pupils’ books.  The views of 11 parents were analysed through the Parent View website.  The inspector also considered the views expressed in five questionnaires returned by school staff.

p.2

Inspection team

Mary Hinds, Lead inspector Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 The school is much smaller than most primary schools.  Almost all pupils are of White British heritage.  Pupils are taught in two mixed-age classes. A small number of Nursery and Reception children are taught alongside Year 1 and some Year 2 pupils. Key Stage 2 pupils are taught in the other class.  There are very few pupils who are supported by the pupil premium, which provides additional funding for pupils who are known to be eligible for free school meals, looked after children and those with parents in the armed forces.  The proportion of pupils supported at school action is well below average. The proportion of pupils supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is above average.  The school’s most recent results cannot be compared with the current government floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress, because

p.3

Information about this school

there were not enough pupils to make such a comparison meaningful.  The current headteacher took over the leadership of the school in 2011. In January 2012, the school became part of a ‘hard federation’ with another small primary school. This means that the headship of the federation is shared between two headteachers. There is a joint governing body for both schools. All staff are contracted to work in both settings. The school business manager oversees both sites. The Key Stage 2 teacher joined the school in September 2012.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the quality of teaching and increase rates of progress so that more is outstanding by:  ensuring that pupils are given time to write for sustained periods of time in literacy and in other subjects so that all pupils, especially more able pupils, make even faster progress  providing clear guidance for pupils on how to improve their work, with time for them to respond to the teachers’ marking  giving pupils more opportunities to learn for themselves through planning, investigating and applying their skills in all lessons, and especially in problem-solving situations, so that progress is more rapid, particularly for those who find mathematics easy.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Ensure that all leaders, including governors, have a clear view of how to drive the school forward by:  identifying in improvement planning measurable targets that can be evaluated based on pupils’ progress  making greater use of national data so that leaders are able to assess how well the school is performing in relation to others.

p.3

The achievement of pupils is good

 Attainment on entry varies significantly because of the exceptionally small numbers of children who join the school. It is broadly in line with national expectations. Whatever their starting points, children make good progress in all the areas of learning in the Early Years Foundation Stage because adults provide stimulating activities that capture their imagination and interests. This engages children fully in their learning.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Standards by the end of Year 6 have risen. In 2012, attainment was above average in reading and writing. It was average in mathematics as a result of fewer pupils achieving the higher levels. This was also the case in Key Stage 1. More able pupils could also do better in Key Stage 1 in their writing. Last year, most pupils made better than expected progress in all three subjects given their different starting points.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Attainment in reading is the strongest. Many older pupils read avidly for pleasure and to help them learn. Younger pupils have a good knowledge of letters and sounds, because these skills are taught systematically and well.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Pupils’ writing is improving because they have opportunities to write about real-life situations. However, there are still too few opportunities for pupils in all year groups to write at length and in other subjects.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Pupils are increasingly presented with problems to solve in different subjects. Key Stage 2 pupils enjoyed the challenge of deciding which mathematical operations to use to work out how much it would cost Henry VIII to pay his servants. Nevertheless, pupils’ books showed that they are not routinely given the opportunity to plan and extend their investigative and independent skills in problem-solving situations.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs achieve well because the work set for them is matched closely to their individual ability levels. Teaching assistants have regular and up-to-date training. They contribute positively to the pupils’ learning by providing tailored support and guidance. The result of these specific activities to boost their progress is regularly monitored and adjusted to sustained good progress.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 The few pupils who are supported by the pupil premium achieve as well as other groups. These pupils benefit from focused help to make sure that their progress is good. These range from one-to-one support, funding for educational visits, and they can take up free places at the school’s before- and after-school activities.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Teachers have high expectations of what pupils can achieve. They have good subject knowledge and plan effectively. They have an excellent understanding of pupils’ ability levels because they make good use of assessment information. They use this to set challenging tasks for pupils of all abilities. Pupils respond well to such activities; they are keen to do their very best.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Teachers use probing questions to assess pupils’ understanding within lessons and they quickly adapt their teaching if pupils are struggling. They intervene and break the task down into smaller steps. This raises pupils’ confidence and inspires them to succeed still further.  Work is now being set within practical, meaningful and relevant situations. In a Key Stage 1 class, pupils celebrated their friends’ birthdays by sharing out party treats. They worked co- operatively and systematically together to ensure that each person had equal amounts. The pupils quickly grasped division facts.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Opportunities for pupils to work on their own are more limited, especially in writing and in mathematics. Pupils are not always able to work on their own initiative, to plan and investigate their own learning, including what resources they will need to complete the task, or to work at length on a piece of writing.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Teachers mark work frequently and accurately. Although pupils’ misconceptions are identified, marking does not always provide them with clear guidance on how to improve their work. Pupils are not given time to respond to the marking.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Teaching assistants are well deployed to support individuals or small groups of pupils. This ensures that disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs, and those pupils eligible for the pupil premium are not left behind. Most reach at least the levels expected for their age by the time they leave school.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils’ positive attitudes to learning and their good behaviour contribute to their improved progress. They are punctual, and their attendance is above average.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils work well with their friends and enjoy helping each other. They confirm that behaviour is good, a view supported by parents and carers who contributed to Parent View.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils listen carefully to teachers and the other adults, and follow their instructions well. They say that they particularly enjoy lessons where they are able to work practically and do things for themselves. Indeed, when they are given the opportunity, pupils show initiative and work well independently, although these opportunities are limited in some lessons.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils understand that bullying can take many forms. They are confident that adults will sort out any problems they may have. Incidents of bullying are low. When they occur, they are tackled sensitively and immediately by the school.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Most pupils are mature enough to behave sensibly even when adults are not around. They willingly take on responsibility and help with a wide range of jobs around the school.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils say they feel safe at school. They have a good understanding of how to keep safe: they are involved in judging risk and know about how to use the internet safety.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is promoted well, through assemblies, visits and through the Forest Schools lessons. Their weekly visit to the local woodland enables pupils to learn about the natural environment, developing their self-confidence and ability to work in teams. For example, during the inspection, pupils reflected on the wonder of the golden leaves as they fell silently down from the trees.

p.5

The leadership and management are good

 Both headteachers provide strong leadership. Through the federation of the two schools, they have created a forward-looking governing body, and staff who share their drive and ambition. This has resulted in significant improvements since the last inspection, particularly in better rates of progress and improved teaching in this school.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Leaders make checks on teaching and the quality of learning, and tackle weaknesses in order to develop teachers’ skills. They set targets for teachers to improve their performance that are linked to pupils’ achievement. This informs staff development and training.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Staff work closely with their colleagues in their partner school, sharing expertise, training and staff development. The quality of teaching continues to improve through increased opportunities for staff to model, coach and mentor each other, using the best role models across both schools.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The school‘s self-evaluation is accurate and identifies areas of relative weakness. However, planned actions to address areas for improvement do not have specific and measurable targets based on pupils’ progress. Leaders, including governors, are not always able to evaluate precisely how successful they are in improving achievement and the quality of teaching.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The school effectively promotes equality of opportunity for its pupils. Tracking pupils’ progress and checks on the accuracy of assessments have been strengthened from the joint working between the schools. Identified gaps in attainment such as in writing improved achievement for pupils in Year 6 in 2012.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The activities planned provide a wide range of relevant experiences for pupils. However, there are too few opportunities for pupils to write for long periods of time in English and other subjects. Pupils are not always given the chance to organise and investigate their own learning.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Partnerships with other schools are good. Recently, older pupils completed a science project with the local high school.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Good links have been established with parents and carers. They are pleased with the school and its management. Communications with parents and carers are good, events are regularly organised for them to attend, and teachers are available to discuss any concerns.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The local authority recognises the many strengths of Lydbury North. The federation has improved this school’s capacity to continue to improve further through shared leadership and joint working. As a result, the local authority support is ‘light touch’, but it has provided vital support for the governing body. The local authority keeps in close contact as the federation continues to grow and flourish.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The governance of the school:  The governing body is made up of members specifically selected on the basis of their experience and skills base. They have all had recent training for their individual roles and have also restructured their committees so that their work is focused on school improvement. They are keen to hold leaders to account still further and to be fully involved in checking how well the school is doing. There are link governors who monitor the implementation of the school development plan. However, they have not drawn up a precise plan of action for school improvement so that the school’s work can be measured accurately. They also do not have a full overview of how well the school is performing in relation to all schools nationally. Governors ensure that safeguarding arrangements meet statutory requirements. They manage finances efficiently across the two schools, ensuring that the pupil premium money benefits

p.6

The leadership and management are good

the pupils for whom it is intended. They have a solid understanding of the quality of teaching and that appraisal arrangements link pay to teachers’ performance.

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.8

School details

Unique reference number 123547 Local authority Shropshire Inspection number 406173

p.9

School details

Type of school Primary School category Voluntary Aided School Age range of pupils 3–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 28 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Colin Williams Headteacher Penelope Knight and Rosanne Pugh Date of previous school inspection 6–7 October 2010 Telephone number 01588 680277 Fax number 01588 680277 Email address admin.lydburynorth@shropshirelg.net guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.10

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.10

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.10

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion