Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 20 Nov 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Samantha Morgan-Price

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Samantha Morgan-Price

  • Postcode verified

    SE3 9PX

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+32Mostly positivemore positive than 40% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiserobusteffectivewell-plannedhappyclearkeenimproving
Criticismnot alwaysinsufficientconcernslow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings292w+69
  • What needs to improve186w−12

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
470
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 27, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
18%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 61%What needs to improve 39%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr B Parker Executive Headteacher Thomas Tallis School Kidbrooke Park Road London SE3 9PX

p.1

alternative provision

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and students, during my visit on 5 and 6 November 2012 to look at the school’s use of alternative provision.

p.1

alternative provision

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

alternative provision

This letter briefly summarises our discussion at the end of the visit.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 A well-planned curriculum enables students who attend alternative provision to access appropriate courses in English and mathematics from which they can gain relevant qualifications. Extra-curricular provision is also well provided for.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 The local authority has robust quality assurance procedures that monitor the services of most providers well, although the registration status of providers is not always given sufficient attention. The ‘G-Choice’ portfolio provides the school with established providers who have undergone effective safeguarding checks.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Providers’ accommodation seen during the survey visit is highly suitable for students especially the outdoor facilities for those students with complex needs.  The majority of students, especially those attending construction placements, are very happy with their placements and feel they have gained valuable skills which they would not have achieved at school, for example working to project deadlines and partnership skills. Many students in Year 10 are keen to pursue a career in their chosen placements.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Effective communication between providers and the school is working well to monitor students who are the most vulnerable to being permanently excluded.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 ensuring that guidance is given to providers to enable them to be fully informed of students’ personal and academic history, so that appropriate support is identified. Clear guidance should also be given to providers to assist them in completing progress reports so that they contain useful information on the progress students have made in their personal, social and employment skills development

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 developing a more robust review of students’ achievement, including the clear identification of appropriate qualifications and progression pathways for all students. Some qualifications achieved by students on full-time placements are of a very low level. Also, there are insufficient opportunities for some students to progress further than level 1 in their chosen placement

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 ensuring that senior leaders scrutinise carefully the monitoring of providers’ quality and the evaluation of the progress that providers make in improving their provision. In addition, sufficient checks need to be implemented to confirm that alternative provision placements are registered with the Department for Education if required.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

My concerns about the registration status of one of the providers you are using have been reported to the Department for Education.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion