Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 20 Nov 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

John Mitcheson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Mitcheson

  • Postcode verified

    PE26 1DG

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+43Positivemore positive than 46% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivesafe

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings345w+43
  • What needs to improve42w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
381
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 36, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 89%What needs to improve 11%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr W Birks Headteacher Abbey College Abbey Road Ramsey Cambridgeshire PE26 1DG

p.1

alternative provision

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and students, during my visits on 8 and 18 October 2012 to look at the school’s use of alternative provision.

p.1

alternative provision

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

alternative provision

This letter briefly summarises our discussion at the end of the visit.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 The college is inclusive. It provides a range of effective strategies to retain students in learning on the college site. Consequently, only a very small proportion of students require alternative arrangements to be made for them to continue their learning off-site.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 For those students who the school thinks will benefit, arrangements are made to enable students to study a range of suitable vocational courses and experience the world of work with local employers.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Collaborative working with other schools in the Huntingdon area and the local authority support services enable the college to locate suitable providers that meet students’ academic, social and behavioural needs.  An in-school support worker, employed by the local authority provides a vital link between the college and local providers by visiting students at their off-site placements, reviewing arrangements and sharing their findings with school staff. This enables students to settle quickly in their placements, keep safe and continue with their education. Students’ attendance and welfare are monitored closely. The school’s own education welfare officer makes regular checks of students’ attendance and local providers make immediate contact with parents and carers, and the school if a student does not arrive.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 The small proportion of students on part and full-time programmes at local, off-site centres for learning appreciate the care and support provided for them by both college staff and those at the centres they attend.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 ensuring that all students who attend alternative provision are studying for an English and mathematics qualification at the appropriate level, and closely monitoring their progress so that they are fully prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion