Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Bernard Campbell
- Postcode verified
WN8 9TG
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 519
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566932 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: hcarnall@cfbt.com
p.1
Wendy Adamson Park Primary School Monmouth Road Doncaster South Yorkshire DN2 4JP
p.1
Introduction
Following my visit to your school on Monday 15 October 2012, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings.
p.1
Introduction
The visit was a monitoring inspection carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 to evaluate aspects of safety and of the leadership and management of safeguarding.
p.1
Evidence
The inspector observed the procedures for pupil leaving Foundation 1 at the end of the day, spoke to parents and carers, scrutinised documents, toured the site with school leaders and met with the headteacher, the deputy headteacher, the Foundation Stage manager and the temporary site manager. He also spoke a representative from the local authority by telephone.
p.1
Context
On 18 September 2012, an incident took place when a child in the Early Years Foundation Stage left the school unsupervised. This event was reported in the local and national media. The incident has been investigated by the School Improvement Service in Doncaster’s Children and Young People’s Service. Ofsted considered that it was appropriate to make a visit to the school to evaluate relevant aspects of safety and the leadership and management of safeguarding.
p.1
Safety and the leadership and management of safeguarding
The investigation of the incident when the child left the school unsupervised was carried out promptly by the headteacher. The local authority carried out its own investigation three weeks later, following the press reports and enquiries from Ofsted. Following the incident, January 2012
p.1
Safety and the leadership and management of safeguarding
Page2 the headteacher and Foundation Stage manager implemented a new procedure immediately. The inspector observed this taking place safely. Parents and carers said they were happy with the new system and thought it was safer. The headteacher and the Chair of Governors have written letters of apology to the parents. The school’s response to the incident, and the measures it has put in place, are effective in dealing with the causes of this incident.
p.2
Safety and the leadership and management of safeguarding
The local authority investigation correctly identified that the fence between the Foundation one exit area and the next door car park is too low. In addition, the exit gate fasteners are within the reach of children. The school is replacing the fence and changing the gate. The monitoring inspection also identified a poorly maintained environmental area close to the Early Years Foundation Stage play area.
p.2
External support
Once made aware of the safety issues by Ofsted, the School Improvement Service carried out an immediate and appropriate investigation of the incident. The investigation report provides a clear account of the findings and recommendations. At the time of the monitoring visit, the headteacher and governing body were awaiting a copy of the investigation report.
p.2
Main Judgements
The school responded effectively to the safeguarding incident. On the day of the monitoring visit the procedures for collecting children were operating safely and to the satisfaction of parents and carers.
p.2
Main Judgements
Leaders have not been effective in assessing and dealing with the risk presented by the potential access by young children to the overgrown environmental area. Ofsted has made clear to leaders that they should ensure that steps are taken now to prevent access to that area.
p.2
Main Judgements
I am copying this letter to the chair of governors and Doncaster Children’s Services. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion