Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

    Page 1 of 2
    Page 1 of the report

    Deep dive

    What this report says

    In plain English

    Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

    Tone of the report

    How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

    −38Criticalmore positive than 9% of reports of this type

    Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

    Praisesaferobusteffective
    Criticismconcernsineffective

    How the report reads, start to finish

    Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

    Findings positive critical

    Strengths

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    No standout praise found.

    Concerns

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    Next steps

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    What the report dwells on

    Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

    Anatomy of the report

    How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

    Pages
    2
    Words of findings
    507
    shorter than usual (typical 1049)
    Reading level
    Hard
    Flesch 44, typical 45
    Average sentence
    20 words
    Next steps
    3
    typical 5
    Hedged sentences
    0%
    “some”, “not always”, “most”…

    Where the words go

    Findings 100%

    Full report text

    Summary of complaint

    On 24 March 2011, we received a complaint that raised concerns about complaints made by parents and carers being handled incorrectly and ineffective risk assessment procedures at the nursery. We needed to investigate these concerns to see whether the setting was meeting the Early Years Foundation Stage welfare requirement relating to ‘safeguarding and promoting children’s welfare’. In particular, these include requirements which state that providers must investigate all written complaints relating to the requirements and notify complainant of the outcome of the investigation writing 28 days of having received the complaint. These also include the requirement that providers must keep a record of accidents and inform parents and carers of any accidents or injuries sustained by the child whilst in the care of the providers. In addition, we needed to investigate wither the setting was meeting the Early Years Foundation Stage welfare requirement

    p.1

    Summary of complaint

    relating to ‘suitable people’. In particular, this includes the requirement which states staffing arrangements must be organised to meeting the needs of the children. In addition, we needed to investigate wither the setting was meeting the Early Years Foundation stage welfare requirement ‘suitable premises’. In particular, this includes the requirement to ensure outdoor and indoor spaces, furniture, equipment and toys are safe and suitable for their purpose.

    p.1

    Summary of complaint

    We do not investigate to prove or disprove a complaint but we look into the information we receive to see if the childcare provider is meeting all legal requirements. We carried out an unannounced visit to the premises on 18 May 2011. On the day of the visit we found that children were being properly supervised at a range of appropriate activities and there was no evidence their needs were not being met. Risk assessments were detailed and in line with requirements to ensure premises and equipment were safe for children’s use and there was no evidence of hazards to children at the nursery. We made a second, announced visit to the setting on 9 June 2011 to look at records. At this visit, we found that accident records were robust and in line with requirements. However, we found that a written complaint had not been responded to within 28 days of the complaint being made. The provider has already taken effective action to meet requirements through:

    p.1

    Summary of complaint

    - reviewing the complaints procedure so that it requires a written response be made to a written complaint within 28 days. (The Early Years Foundation Stage - safeguarding and promoting children's welfare)

    p.2

    Summary of complaint

    -demonstrating that this reviewed complaints procedure is in use at the nursery

    p.2

    Summary of complaint

    We are satisfied by the action taken by the provider and no further action is required. The provider remains registered with Ofsted.

    p.2

    Publication of complaints

    We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.

    p.2

    Publication of complaints

    We publish details of complaints for five years commencing on the date we complete our investigation.

    p.2

    Publication of complaints

    For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet (Reference no. 080120)

    p.2

    Discuss this inspection

    Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

    Join the discussion