Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
St Patrick's Catholic Primary School
Summary
David Law (lead), Robert Birtwell
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
26 Sept 2012
- Inspectors verified
David Law, Robert Birtwell
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Satisfactory
- Postcode verified
LA3 2ER
- Name on report verified
St Patrick's Catholic Primary School
- URN verified
119583
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2006.
- OverallInadequate
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This is a school that has serious weaknesses. p.1
- It is not good enough to help pupils make up gaps in their learning, particularly in reading and writing. p.1
- The inspection monitoring report of October 2011 said that progress was too slow to help close gaps in pupils’ skills and understanding. p.4
- Many pupils now in Years 1 and 2 lack confidence as readers and often struggle to use their knowledge of letters and sounds well enough. p.4
- This leaves gaps in learning and teaching is not strong enough to help them catch up quickly. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve teaching so it is consistently good or better by: - making better use of time in lessons so learning moves at a quicker pace - making sure that work is at the right level for pupils’ of different abilities - providing teachers with more training in how to develop pupils’ reading and writing skills. p.3
- Improve leadership and management by: - strengthening skills in judging the impact each teacher has on pupils’ learning and using this information to set targets for teachers’ further training and support - ensuring senior leaders provide more support for subject leaders to develop their leadership skills. p.3
- There is some good teaching but too little to ensure pupils make enough progress over time. p.4
- This inconsistency in teaching quality means that the rate of pupils’ learning is too variable and they underachieve. p.4
- The local authority’s and headteacher’s records of teaching quality show that it has been weaker in the past and is improving. p.4
- In all classrooms, relations between pupils and teachers are positive and behaviour is managed well. p.4
- In the better lessons, particularly in Year 2 and Year 6, teachers are skilful at asking the right questions to test pupils’ understanding. p.4
- Most pupils listen quietly and make an effort in their learning. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 2,265
- shorter than usual (typical 3317)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 54, typical 46
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 17%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
St Patrick's Catholic Primary School Littledale Avenue, Heysham, Morecambe, LA3 2ER
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Inadequate 4 Achievement of pupils Inadequate 4 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Requires improvement 3 Leadership and management Requires improvement 3
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a school that has serious weaknesses. Pupils’ make too little progress and standards of attainment in reading and writing are low, particularly for boys. After several years of falling results at the end of Year 2 and Year 6, improvements in 2012 are fragile. Recent gains in pupils’ progress are not being sustained in all classes. Although teaching is improving it is too variable in quality. It is not good enough to help pupils make up gaps in their learning, particularly in reading and writing. Work is not always planned at the right level. Leaders and managers are not precise enough when they judge the effect of teaching on pupils’ learning. Further training and support is needed to help subject leaders develop their roles in checking and improving teaching so that pupils’ progress improves. Attendance remains poor despite the school’s concerted effort to improve it. This is why behaviour and safety are not good even
p.1
The school has the following strengths
Pupils are safe, well cared for and get on well together. Leaders and governors are acting with urgency and the pace of improvement has stepped up recently with support from the local authority. Governors provide effective support and challenge to the headteacher. Teachers are keen to improve and take on further training. Children settle well into the Reception class because induction arrangements are good. Teachers’ marking of pupils’ books helps them to improve. Teaching assistants provide valuable support for learning. All staff understand what needs to be done to improve teaching and recent steps taken are beginning to have an effect.
p.1
Information about this inspection
Inspectors held meetings with staff, members of the governing body and a representative from Lancashire local authority. Inspectors took into account seven responses from parents to the online questionnaire, Parent View, as well as one letter from a parent and an e-mail from another. They met some parents informally at the start of the school day. Inspectors observed teaching in each class and made a judgement about the teaching in 15 lessons. In addition, they saw an assembly, observed groups taught by teaching assistants and observed breaks and lunchtimes. The headteacher conducted two joint observations with an inspector. Inspectors heard three groups of pupils read and met with two groups of pupils to gather their views about the school. They also looked at the responses from the school’s own survey of pupils’ views. Inspectors looked at a number of documents including the improvement plan, the school’s
p.2
Information about this inspection
analysis of its information about pupils’ progress.
p.2
Inspection team
David Law, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Robert Birtwell Additional Inspector
p.2
Full report
In accordance with the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than it might in all the circumstances reasonably be expected to perform.
p.3
Information about this school
St Patrick’s Catholic Primary is an average sized primary school. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for the pupil premium (additional government funding) is above the national average. The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs through school action is above average. The proportion of pupils supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is above average. Around half of the pupils are of Irish Traveller or Romany Gypsy heritage. The proportion of pupils from these groups has increased over the last three years. Most other pupils are White British. There are frequent changes to the school population as many pupils join or leave the school at different times of the year. For three years up to and including 2011, the school did not meet the government’s floor standards (these are the minimum standards and rate of progress expected of primary pupils).
p.3
Information about this school
However, unvalidated results for 2012 indicate that these standards have been met.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve teaching so it is consistently good or better by: - making better use of time in lessons so learning moves at a quicker pace - making sure that work is at the right level for pupils’ of different abilities - providing teachers with more training in how to develop pupils’ reading and writing skills.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve pupils’ progress in reading and writing, particularly for boys by: - targeting support for families of pupils with low attendance - using a step by step approach to developing key skills in handwriting, spelling and punctuation - increasing pupils’ ability to use and apply their reading skills in other subjects - teaching older pupils the skill of reading between the lines and to read with greater understanding - building pupils’ stamina as writers so they are more confident in writing at length.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve leadership and management by: - strengthening skills in judging the impact each teacher has on pupils’ learning and using this information to set targets for teachers’ further training and support - ensuring senior leaders provide more support for subject leaders to develop their leadership skills.
p.3
The achievement of pupils is inadequate
Since the previous inspection, pupils’ attainment at the end of Years 2 and 6 has fallen year-on- year. Although recent improvements in 2012 have brought attainment to average levels, such gains are not secure. The school’s recent information on pupils’ achievement shows that progress is quicker in some areas of learning but this is not the case in all classes. Too many pupils do not make enough progress, for example boys in reading and writing and some pupils with special educational needs. Children start in Reception with skills, knowledge and understanding below those typical for their age. They settle well into routines and play happily together. This positive start to learning helps most to make steady progress but is not built on as pupils move through the school. By the end of Year 2, attainment for most pupils is low and progress across Key Stage 1 is too slow even though pupils do better in Year 2. Until the improvement in 2012, standards in
p.4
The achievement of pupils is inadequate
reading had been falling for three years. Many pupils now in Years 1 and 2 lack confidence as readers and often struggle to use their knowledge of letters and sounds well enough. Pupils’ progress is also patchy across Key Stage 2, being fastest in Year 6. For example, Year 6 pupils applied themselves well in a writing lesson but still struggled with handwriting, punctuation and grammar. Pupils show little stamina as writers and find it difficult to draft longer pieces of work. Too many older pupils do not read fluently or with expression. Their understanding of the meaning of texts is limited. This limits their ability to read widely across subjects of the curriculum. Many boys are reluctant to read. Achievement in mathematics is stronger than in English. However, some pupils find it difficult to understand key ideas such as place value or to recall key number facts. For example, in one Key Stage 2 lesson, many pupils became confused about the value of digits when using
p.4
The achievement of pupils is inadequate
decimals and others could not remember multiplication facts. Poor attendance for a significant number of pupils impedes progress. This leaves gaps in learning and teaching is not strong enough to help them catch up quickly. The inspection monitoring report of October 2011 said that progress was too slow to help close gaps in pupils’ skills and understanding. This is still the case in English although gains in mathematics are more secure. The achievement of some pupils with special educational needs is better in Key Stage 1 than it is in Key Stage 2. Similarly, Traveller and Gypsy Roma pupils do better in some classes than in others. Those known to be eligible for the pupil premium tend to reach higher standards of attainment than others but only in some classes.
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
There is some good teaching but too little to ensure pupils make enough progress over time. This inconsistency in teaching quality means that the rate of pupils’ learning is too variable and they underachieve. The local authority’s and headteacher’s records of teaching quality show that it has been weaker in the past and is improving. In all classrooms, relations between pupils and teachers are positive and behaviour is managed well. In the better lessons, particularly in Year 2 and Year 6, teachers are skilful at asking the right questions to test pupils’ understanding. Most pupils listen quietly and make an effort in their learning. However, in too many lessons time is not used well and teachers spend too long talking to pupils who remain passively listening. This slows the rate at which pupils gain skills and understanding and some become restless and inattentive. Recent training has helped teachers to improve lesson planning and there is now a common
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
approach. Nonetheless, the work is not always at the right level for individuals and groups of pupils. So, some pupils find work too hard and some find it too easy. Teaching assistants often make a good contribution to pupils’ learning, for example by listening to pupils read. The school has revised the system for marking pupils’ books and all teachers are acting on this. There are some examples of good marking. Pupils say they find the marking comments helpful but admit they do not always read them. When pupils are heard reading they show they have been taught about letters and the sounds that they make (phonics) but too often they are unsure how to apply this knowledge to books they are less familiar with and do not understand what it is they are reading about. Pupils are taught how to write for different purposes but their presentation is poor, where teachers expect too little. Not enough has been done to train teachers in how best to develop
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
pupils’ reading and writing skills, particularly those of boys.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils requires improvement
Attendance is well below the national average and too many pupils have a lot of time off school. The school thoroughly checks out reasons for absence and is working hard with parents and families to encourage good attendance. Despite some recent improvement, this low attendance affects pupils’ progress and means that behaviour and safety requires improvement. The school is orderly and most pupils conduct themselves well. They are usually considerate of others. The inspection started on a very rainy day and pupils’ behaviour was good when they had to stay indoors during a wet playtime. Pupils from different backgrounds get on well together and show interest in different cultures and traditions. Pupils feel safe and have a reasonable awareness of how to keep safe. Parents say they feel confident in the level of care at the school. Pupils report that bullying is rare but there is some name calling. When such incidents happen pupils are confident adults will help them.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils requires improvement
When given the chance, pupils are keen to take on responsibility and enjoy doing jobs in the classroom, often co-operating well when they do. For example, the Reception children are good at tidying away. In lessons, pupils usually work well with each other but when teachers talk for too long they become distracted.
p.5
The leadership and management requires improvement
Leaders and governors are working to improve teaching through setting higher expectations of staff. The appointment of new governors has given governance impetus and the pace of improvement has quickened in the last school year. Underachievement remains, however, as a result of weaker teaching in the past and some that still requires improvement. Further training has improved lesson planning and marking. Despite this, work is not always at the right level to help pupils make the rapid improvement needed. Methods to check on the quality of teaching and learning are now established with lessons observed regularly. Monitoring is done to an agreed plan, a key feature of which is the scrutiny of pupils’ books. Evaluations of what such checks show are not sharp enough and do not focus sufficiently on the impact each teacher has on pupils’ learning, neither is such information used to set targets for teachers’ further training and support
p.5
The leadership and management requires improvement
All senior leaders understand what needs to be done. Plans for improvement are clear and everyone wants to see achievement and teaching improve. Leaders see the urgency of what needs to be done; advances have been made but not rapidly enough to get rid of the weaknesses in pupils’ achievement. There have been some improvements in achievement recently, halting the sharp fall in standards since the last inspection. Examples include improvement in mathematics and better results at the end of Years 6 and 2 this year. Together with recent improvements in teaching, this shows the school is able to continue improving. Senior leaders have not done enough to promote stronger leadership from other staff. Despite their commitment to their leadership role subject leaders have had too little impact so far on improving pupils’ attainment. There are regular meetings to review pupils’ progress but too little opportunity for teachers to compare the work in pupils’ books across different classes.
p.5
The leadership and management requires improvement
The headteacher, in consultation with governors, has made better use of teachers’ individual skills by allocating them to certain classes. However, teachers in job-share arrangements have too little dedicated time to work together during the school day to plan for continuity in pupils’ learning. At the last full inspection the school was asked to strengthen links with parents and this has been successfully achieved. The homework scheme is supporting parents to help their children learn. There is good guidance for parents whose children have complex learning needs and one parent was full of praise for this. The school fosters good relations between all groups of pupils and tackles discrimination but, although this promotes equal opportunity to learn, underachievement is present across all groups. However, the pupil premium has been used wisely to provide additional support for those who need it and is closing the gap between this group and all pupils.
p.6
The leadership and management requires improvement
The local authority has provided intensive support but the school is not too dependent on this. The level of support has been reduced as improvement is seen. The curriculum provides valuable opportunities for pupils to visit places of interest and pupils say how much they enjoy this. The school’s commitment to its faith, which can be seen in assembly and during prayer, supports pupils’ spiritual, moral and social development well. The governance of the school: - Governors aspire to improve learning for all groups of pupils and act in support of the headteacher while also providing challenge. They have a good knowledge of the Gypsy Roma and Traveller cultures in the community. The governing body meets its statutory duties and is well informed about safeguarding requirements. Governors have a secure grasp of what needs to improve and have acted promptly to bring about improvements.
p.6
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupil’s needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupil’s needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.7
School details
Unique reference number 119583 Local authority Lancashire Inspection number 401854
p.8
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Type of school Primary School category Voluntary aided Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 176 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Theresa Moore Headteacher Carol Hind Date of previous school inspection 5 May 2010 Telephone number 01524 851766 Fax number 01524 855091 Email address head@st-patricks-pri.lancs.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.9
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille,
p.9
School details
please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.9
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion