Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Sacred Heart Roman Catholic Primary School, Church
Summary
Clare Henderson (lead), Sheila O'Keeffe
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
10 Oct 2012
- Inspectors verified
Clare Henderson, Sheila O'Keeffe
- Leadership and management AI-checked
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Satisfactory
- Postcode verified
BB5 4HG
- Name on report verified
Sacred Heart Roman Catholic Primary School
- URN verified
119658
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2007.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- They are supportive of the school and no concerns were raised concerning their children’s well-being or safety. p.5
- Pupils who display challenging behaviour are well managed by caring and supportive adults and other pupils are very tolerant and understanding of the needs of their classmates. p.5
- Behaviour is judged as good rather than outstanding because, when teaching requires improvements, occasionally pupils are not fully engaged in their learning and their behaviour slips. p.5
- They are proud of their school and enjoy being p.5
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- There has been a recent improvement in pupils’ achievement. p.1
- However, systems and plans ito ensure that the quality of all teaching is at least good have not had sufficent time to make sure achievement is consistently good across the school. p.1
- Subject leaders have not been fully involved in checking pupils’ achievement in all subjects of the curriculum. p.1
- Teaching still requires improvement in some classes: not all teachers plan work which is sufficently challenging for all pupils and, in particular, the more able. p.1
- Opportunities are missed to help pupils to learn independently or to extend their literacy and numeracy skills across the curriculum. p.1
- Children’s skills, when they begin school, are well below those normally found. p.4
- Good quality teaching, provision and strong links with parents both before and when children begin school ensure they make good progress in the Early Years Foundation Stage. p.4
- This is particularly impressive in children’s communication and personal and social skills. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 1,965
- shorter than usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Sacred Heart Roman Catholic Primary School Bradshaw Row, Church, Accrington , BB5 4HG
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Requires improvement 3
p.1
This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because
There has been a recent improvement in pupils’ achievement. However, systems and plans ito ensure that the quality of all teaching is at least good have not had sufficent time to make sure achievement is consistently good across the school. Subject leaders have not been fully involved in checking pupils’ achievement in all subjects of the curriculum. Teaching still requires improvement in some classes: not all teachers plan work which is sufficently challenging for all pupils and, in particular, the more able. Opportunities are missed to help pupils to learn independently or to extend their literacy and numeracy skills across the curriculum.
p.1
The school has the following strengths
Children’s achievement in the Early Years Foundation Stage is good. The attainment of pupils in Key Stage 1 has steadily improved in reading and was above average in 2012. The curriculum provides effectively for pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. Pupils with special educational needs achieve well. Behaviour is good. There is a culture of mutual respect and calm across the school because the clear and inclusive values are understood and applied by all. Governors have fully checked that the pupil premium funding has been appropriately used to improve pupils’ learning.
p.1
Information about this inspection
The inspectors observed 16 lessons, two of which were joint observations with the headteacher, listened to individual pupils reading in Years 1, 2, 4 and 6 and scrutinised pupils’ work in books. They held meetings with pupils, staff, members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority. They observed the school’s work and looked at documents relating to safeguarding, pupils’ progress and attainment and the way in which the school evaluates its own performance. The inspectors took account of the three responses from the on-line questionnaire (Parent View) and the school’s own parental survey.
p.2
Inspection team
Clare Henderson, Lead inspector Additional inspector Sheila O'Keeffe Additional inspector
p.2
Information about this school
This is an average-sized primary school. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for the pupil premium funding is above average. The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs and are supported through school action is above average. The percentage of pupils supported by school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is above average. The percentage of pupils from minority ethnic groups and those learning to speak English as an additional language is above average. The proportion of pupils who join or leave the school at different times through the year is higher than that seen nationally. The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress. The governing body manages a breakfast club which was observed during the inspection.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of teaching to raise achievement to at least good in English and mathematics in all classes by providing: work which is fully matched to pupils’ learning needs and fully challenging for the more able pupils pupils with clear steps setting out how they can improve their work time for pupils to review and extend their learning independently opportunities for pupils to extend their literacy and numeracy skills across all subjects of the curriculum. Improve the effectiveness of the leadership and management, of governance and at all levels within the school, in improving the quality of teaching and monitoring the school‘s effectiveness by: ensuring plans for school improvement consistently show precise timescales, clearly identify outcomes which are measurable, and fully involve governors in reviewing their impact on pupils’ achievement involving all subject leaders in reviewing pupils’ achievement in all subjects of the curriculum.
p.3
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
Children’s skills, when they begin school, are well below those normally found. Good quality teaching, provision and strong links with parents both before and when children begin school ensure they make good progress in the Early Years Foundation Stage. This is particularly impressive in children’s communication and personal and social skills. The teaching of phonics (learning about letters and the sounds they make) systematically addresses the different ability needs of the children in the Early Years Foundation Stage and in the Key Stage 1 classes. Consequently, reading attainment is rapidly improving and was above average by the end of Year 2 in 2012. Pupils make sound progress from their starting points in Key Stage 1, and good progress in reading. However, their attainment, though above average in reading, is below average by the end of Year 2 in writing and mathematics. Pupils’ achievement through Years 3 to 6 in English and mathematics has improved since the
p.4
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
last inspection. Consequently, their attainment by the time they leave Year 6 has improved from well below to below average in English and mathematics. Pupils’ achievement throughout the school is slower than it could be because work set does not consistently challenge pupils in their learning and, in particular, to achieve the higher levels. Although learning in Years 1 to 6 requires improvement overall, in a majority of lessons observed good learning was evident. Learning is good when teaching is well planned to capture pupils’ imagination and challenge their thinking. For instance, in a Year 2 English lesson, pupils’ learning was accelerated at a good pace as the teacher used timely interventions to extend the pupils’ thinking and move them on in their learning as they produced plans to help them to write a story. Pupils eligible for the pupil premium funding, those from minority ethnic minority groups, or
p.4
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
those who join during the school year, generally make as much progress as others. Those with special educational needs achieve better than the national average and make at least good progress over time. This is because of the high quality support made available and the well considered grouping of pupils for additional support.
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
The quality of teaching is not consistently good across the school. Consequently, pupils’ achievement requires improvement. Among the strong features of lessons are pupils’ positive attitudes to learning, their good behaviour in most lessons and the good relationships evident between adults, pupils and parents throughout the school. In the best lessons, adults plan activities which are challenging, model high expectations of work and pupils know clearly what is expected of them and how they can succeed in their learning. Furthermore, in the best lessons, pupils have opportunities to work independently and extend their learning. Detailed marking and regular homework are used effectively to direct pupils’ next steps and to accelerate their learning. Time is provided for them to review their own learning and follow up on teachers’ comments. Working with partners in lessons encourages pupils to share their ideas, which are
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
subsequently embedded in learning. This was evident in a Year 6 mathematics lesson as pupils worked together to solve calculations involving fractions. Searching and challenging questions from the teacher extended pupils’ thinking and understanding effectively. When the pace of learning slows in lessons which require improvement, pupils do not learn as rapidly as they could. This is because teachers have not used information about pupils’ prior knowledge and understanding well enough to plan lessons which match pupils’ needs and are sufficiently challenging. The teaching of reading is systematic and well planned in the Early Years Foundation Stage and in Key Stage 1. However, the teaching of writing and mathematics throughout the school is inconsistent. This is because at times teachers are over reliant on worksheets and provide limited opportunities for pupils to extend their learning independently.
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
The teaching for pupils who are eligible for the pupil premium funding is managed well. Parents say, and the inspectors agree, that care for those with special educational needs is good because all adults, and particularly teaching assistants, ensure pupils receive appropriate support specific to their needs. As a result, all pupils have equal opportunities and potential discrimination is tackled well.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Observations during the inspection and school records show that behaviour is typically good around the school and over time. Pupils enjoy school and say that bad behaviour rarely spoils lessons. In the lessons which were good, pupils were fully engaged and well behaved. There are clear expectations of behaviour and systems for reward and sanctions and most pupils adhere to expectations and follow schools rules effectively. Behaviour is judged as good rather than outstanding because, when teaching requires improvements, occasionally pupils are not fully engaged in their learning and their behaviour slips. Systems for recording and for following up behavioural incidents are secure. Pupils who display challenging behaviour are well managed by caring and supportive adults and other pupils are very tolerant and understanding of the needs of their classmates. Pupils show positive attitudes to learning. They are proud of their school and enjoy being
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
school councillors or when they help to raise funds for projects such as designing and building new playground facilities. The mutual respect between pupils and adults contributes well to the school’s positive ethos and calm atmosphere. Pupils are happy and have good opportunities to participate in thoughtful school assemblies where they sing, reflect and pray together. This promotes their good behaviour and safety and strong spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. Pupils feel safe and show a good understanding of the risks associated with, for example, the use of new technology. Pupils are adamant that behaviour is consistently good and that there is little bullying. Parents believe that behaviour is generally good and do not express concerns that their children’s learning is disrupted by poor behaviour. They are supportive of the school and no concerns were raised concerning their children’s well-being or safety.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
The school and parents have worked extremely diligently together to promote the importance of punctuality and to improve attendance, which is now around the national average. In the Early Years Foundation Stage, care and welfare are good and this contributes to children settling well into school routines. A daily breakfast club, attended by a good proportion of pupils, makes a strong contribution to pupils’ personal development.
p.5
The leadership and management requires improvement
Through strong collaboration with the local authority, leaders and governors have worked rigorously to improve the quality of teaching and raise pupils’ achievement through adopting a sharper focus on monitoring teaching and learning. As a result, the quality of teaching has improved and a large majority of teaching is now good. However, current plans for school improvement do not consistently show precise timescales, clearly identify outcomes which are measurable or fully involve governors in reviewing their impact on pupils’ achievement and ensuring all teaching is at least good. There are effective procedures for managing the work of that staff. The headteacher has worked closely with governors and other leaders within the school to enable them to develop their leadership roles. The school has introduced more opportunities for the professional development of all staff. The headteacher and all adults provide a strong focus on care and support for pupils and their
p.5
The leadership and management requires improvement
families and in particular for those with special educational needs, new to the school or learning English as an additional language. Pupils benefit from a broad and balanced curriculum. It is well designed to provide them with a range of cultural and religious experiences and opportunities to participate in a range of enrichment activities which extend their musical and sporting skills well. However, subject leaders are not sufficiently involved in checking that pupils achieve as well as they could in all subjects of the curriculum. The school has strong links with the local community, which ensures a thorough understanding of its differing needs, aspirations, values and diversity. Regular and informative communications with parents ensures that they are fully informed about and actively involved in their children’s education. All statutory requirements relating to safeguarding are met. The governance of the school:
p.6
The leadership and management requires improvement
members of the governing body receive accurate information. They are supportive and challenging in their evaluation of the school’s effectiveness they ensure that arrangements for the performance management of the work that staff do are appropriate. However, they are not fully involved in monitoring the impact of school improvement plans on pupils’ achievement governors have fully checked that the pupil premium funding is appropriately used to improve eligible pupils’ learning.
p.6
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.7
School details
Unique reference number 119658 Local authority Lancashire Inspection number 401859
p.8
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Type of school Primary School category Voluntary aided Age range of pupils 3-11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 187 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Debbie Kenyon Headteacher Jacqueline Williams Date of previous school inspection 4 March 2010 Telephone number 01254 233382 Fax number 01254 390944 Email address head@sacredheart-church.lancs.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.9
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille,
p.9
School details
please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.9
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion