Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Esland South Limited in Bexley
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
10 Sept 2012
- Inspectors verified
Caroline Wilson
- URN verified
SC387684
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The monitoring of the home to assess whether it is efficiently managed and effective in meeting its Statement of Purpose has significantly improved. p.3
- Staff effectively intervene to reduce bullying behaviours to ensure that positive relationships are developed and maintained between young people. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection. p.3
- have made poor choices or where risks taken are unacceptable, staff have assisted them to understand and manage their own behaviour differently. p.4
- This home was judged as inadequate at its full inspection. p.3
- Young people now live in a home where any form of bullying is totally unacceptable. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance3
“The management of the home has significantly improved.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 832
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 38, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC387684 Inspection date 10/09/2012 Inspector Caroline Wilson Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 22/06/2012 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Brief description of the service
The home is a residential home for six children and young people with emotional and behavioural difficulties. The home is operated by a private company and can offer planned, emergency and respite placements.
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress .
p.3
Progress
This home was judged as inadequate at its full inspection. Good progress has been made since this time. At this interim inspection, the home has evidenced improvement in the quality of care and outcomes for young people. It has addressed all the five statutory requirements that were previously set. These were to ensure the proper supervision of young people, to ensure that there is full and satisfactory information with regards to staff before they start working there, to ensure that the manager has the necessary skills to manage the home, to ensure that procedures are implemented with regards to bullying and, when young people are missing, to protect them from gang-related violence and sexual exploitation.
p.3
Progress
The monitoring of the home to assess whether it is efficiently managed and effective in meeting its Statement of Purpose has significantly improved. These now accurately identify areas of improvement so that the quality of care can be improved for the benefit of young people.
p.3
Progress
Young people now live in a home where any form of bullying is totally unacceptable. Young people are confident in telling staff if they have any concerns in this respect. Staff effectively intervene to reduce bullying behaviours to ensure that positive relationships are developed and maintained between young people.
p.3
Progress
The management of the home has significantly improved. The previous manager has resumed her role as Registered Manager and she is supported in her task by senior staff. This has provided young people and staffing with consistency of care and has helped to improve the childcare practice. For instance, staff meetings now regularly take place. Staff now have a greater understanding of policies and procedures and how these should be implemented in to their day-to-day practice. Behavioural plans assist staff to intervene constructively so that young people have the right kind of support to develop positive behaviour. As a consequence, key working sessions are held regularly and address a range of issues in order that young people know how to keep themselves safe within the home and in the community. Discussions have been held with young people with regards to alcohol abuse, risks relating to sexual exploitation, gang involvement and behaviour management. Where young people
p.4
Progress
have made poor choices or where risks taken are unacceptable, staff have assisted them to understand and manage their own behaviour differently. Young people engage in activities that act as a diversion from being involved in negative behaviours and which promote their self-confidence and self-esteem. Gardening helps young people learn how to positively nurture, be responsible, gives them a sense of achievement and is a form of exercise to keep them healthy. Any concerns with regards to young people's risk-taking behaviours are followed up, where relevant, with other agencies. This includes safeguarding agencies and counselling and support services to safeguard young people's welfare and to help them grow into well rounded and mature adults.
p.4
Progress
Staff understand the procedures that should be followed in the event of any allegation or disclosure of abuse. Any concerns are promptly referred to safeguarding agencies and safety measures put in place in order to protect young people following an allegation. Young people have trusting relationships with staff. There is a culture of openness and trust between young people and staff, which enables young people to feel safe to alert staff if they have any worries or concerns.
p.4
Progress
Recruitments systems have improved and now ensure that only staff who are carefully vetted can work with young people. Full and satisfactory information is now available, including proof of qualifications. This allows the home to make informed decisions with regards to the integrity of staff and effectively assess whether they have the right attributes to work with young people.
p.4
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.5
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection (March 2011).
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion